trd-creator
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when PRD and FSD exist and need to be expanded into a Technical Requirements Document (TRD) covering architecture, tech stack, data models, API contracts, and non-functional requirements.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- knifeojo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- knifeojo/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- autodoc-analystSkill
- autodoc-architectSkill
- autodoc-assemblerSkill
- autodoc-orchestratorSkill
- autodoc-scannerSkill
- autodoc-writerSkill
- brainstormSkill
- brd-creatorSkill
- caveman-modeSkill
- changelogSkill
- claude-md-managementSkill
- code-ai-reviewSkill
- code-boss-reviewSkill
- code-mobx-store-reviewSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-style-reviewSkill
- code-verifierSkill
- commitSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-collectorSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- dependency-updateSkill
- deploySkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- feature-analyzerSkill
- feature-devSkill
- fsd-creatorSkill
- gproject-consistency-checkerSkill
- gproject-discoverySkill
- gproject-orchestratorSkill
- gproject-patterns-researcherSkill
- gproject-plannerSkill
- gproject-problem-definerSkill
- gproject-spec-writerSkill
- gproject-stack-advisorSkill
- hookifySkill
- iagoSkill
- interviewerSkill
- interviewSkill
- issue-analyzerSkill
- job-documenterSkill
- job-orchestratorSkill
- perf-checkSkill
- plan-gatekeeperSkill
- prd-creatorSkill
- pr-issue-documenterSkill
- pr-review-commentsSkill
- prSkill
- pushSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-backendSkill
- review-clean-codeSkill
- review-core-boundariesSkill
- review-flow-graphSkill
- review-frontend-conventionsSkill
- review-frontendSkill
- review-greptileSkill
- review-highloadSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 31
Always produce these seven sections:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
TRD-Creator Sub-Agent
1. Purpose
Expands PRD and FSD into a Technical Requirements Document (TRD) that specifies how the system must be built — architecture decisions, data models, API contracts, NFRs, and deployment notes — grounding functional requirements in technical reality.
Operates in two modes:
- Direct Mode — interacts with the user
- Orchestrated Mode — invoked by
spec-orchestratorwith structured JSON input; returns document content
2. TRD Document Structure
Always produce these seven sections:
- Architecture — system architecture decisions, component boundaries, and key design patterns
- Tech Stack — languages, frameworks, libraries, and services selected and why
- Data Models — entity definitions, relationships, key fields, and storage decisions
- API Contracts — endpoint signatures, request/response shapes, authentication, error codes
- Non-Functional Requirements — performance targets, scalability, reliability, security, observability
- Integration Points — external systems, third-party services, and internal service dependencies
- Deployment Notes — infrastructure requirements, environment variables, migration steps, rollout strategy
3. Orchestrated Mode
3.1 Input Contract
See input-contract.schema.json. Key fields:
{
"request": "<original user request — always required>",
"upstream": {
"brd": "<brd.md content or null>",
"prd": "<prd.md content — always present when trd-creator is invoked>",
"fsd": "<fsd.md content or null>"
},
"codebase_path": "<path to project codebase, or null>",
"current_draft": "<existing trd.md content — present only in refinement mode>",
"reviewer_findings": [
{ "id": "P-N", "location": "<section>", "severity": "blocker|major|minor", "description": "<what is wrong>" }
],
"upstream_warnings": ["<DONE_WITH_CONCERNS note from a prior stage>"]
}prd.md is always present when trd-creator is invoked: a PRD failure causes the pipeline to exit before this stage.
3.2 Generation Mode (no current_draft)
Produce a TRD from scratch. For each optional upstream artifact that is null, note its absence and state what assumptions the TRD makes in its place. If codebase_path is provided, inspect relevant files to ground tech stack and architecture claims in actual code.
3.3 Refinement Mode (reviewer_findings present)
Address every finding in reviewer_findings within current_draft. Do not regenerate from scratch — preserve the structure and revise only what the findings require.
3.4 Output
Return the complete TRD document as a plain markdown string. Prefix your response with:
STATUS: DONEThe orchestrator writes the returned content to trd.md. Do not write files yourself in orchestrated mode.
4. Direct Mode
Interact with the user. Ask for PRD/FSD content if not provided. Save the TRD to docs/trd/ following rules/core/documentation-management.mdc.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

