interviewer
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when requirements are ambiguous and precise clarification is needed before proceeding with a complex task.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hussainweb/skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 18, 2026
- priyanshu-arya/LinkedIn_Automationtheir own version, first seen Sep 17, 2026
- kevinaimonster/skill-hubtheir own version, first seen Mar 18, 2026
- emersonmccuin-pixel/claude-code-starter-kittheir own version, first seen Feb 20, 2026
- consistentJake/Claude-Code-As-Teachertheir own version, first seen Jan 19, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- consistentJake/Claude-Code-As-Teacher★ 84same name
- kevinaimonster/skill-hub★ 4same name
- emersonmccuin-pixel/claude-code-starter-kit★ 2same name
- hussainweb/skills★ 2same name
- priyanshu-arya/LinkedIn_Automation★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- autodoc-analystSkill
- autodoc-architectSkill
- autodoc-assemblerSkill
- autodoc-orchestratorSkill
- autodoc-scannerSkill
- autodoc-writerSkill
- brainstormSkill
- brd-creatorSkill
- caveman-modeSkill
- changelogSkill
- claude-md-managementSkill
- code-ai-reviewSkill
- code-boss-reviewSkill
- code-mobx-store-reviewSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-style-reviewSkill
- code-verifierSkill
- commitSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-collectorSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- dependency-updateSkill
- deploySkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- feature-analyzerSkill
- feature-devSkill
- fsd-creatorSkill
- gproject-consistency-checkerSkill
- gproject-discoverySkill
- gproject-orchestratorSkill
- gproject-patterns-researcherSkill
- gproject-plannerSkill
- gproject-problem-definerSkill
- gproject-spec-writerSkill
- gproject-stack-advisorSkill
- hookifySkill
- iagoSkill
- interviewSkill
- issue-analyzerSkill
- job-documenterSkill
- job-orchestratorSkill
- perf-checkSkill
- plan-gatekeeperSkill
- prd-creatorSkill
- pr-issue-documenterSkill
- pr-review-commentsSkill
- prSkill
- pushSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-backendSkill
- review-clean-codeSkill
- review-core-boundariesSkill
- review-flow-graphSkill
- review-frontend-conventionsSkill
- review-frontendSkill
- review-greptileSkill
- review-highloadSkill
- review-logicSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely.
- Distinctive: line 54
When requirements are vague or ambiguous
- Distinctive: line 63
Ask questions one at a time
- Distinctive: line 67
Ask: "What are we working on?" (if topic not in arguments)
- Very specific: line 68
Run context-collector as sub-agent to gather codebase context
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<SUBAGENT-STOP>
If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely.
This skill is for orchestrators and interactive session-level routing only.
Proceed directly with your assigned task.
</SUBAGENT-STOP>Interviewer
Purpose
Gathers precise context through focused, critical questions before a complex skill executes. Prevents wasted work from wrong assumptions. Asks one question at a time, provides options where possible, and skips questions the context already answers.
Input schema:
topic: string — what is being worked on
goal: string — which skill will use these answers
context?: { — optional, provided by calling skill
codebase_summary?: string
recent_changes?: string
relevant_files?: string[]
existing_analysis?: string
}Output schema:
answers: [{question, answer, confidence: "certain"|"assumption"|"unknown"}]
derived_context: string — all gathered info as one coherent block
ready_to_proceed: boolean
blockers?: string[] — unresolved critical unknownsWhen to Use
- Called by
job-orchestrator,brainstorm,feature-devat start of Phase 0 - Directly by user:
/interviewer <topic>— runs context-collector first if no context provided - When requirements are vague or ambiguous
Workflow
If called by another skill (context provided)
- Parse input context
- Determine what's still unknown or ambiguous for the stated goal
- Decide number of questions needed (typically 2-6)
- Skip questions already answered by context
- Ask questions one at a time
- Produce output schema
If called directly by user (no context)
- Ask: "What are we working on?" (if topic not in arguments)
- Run
context-collectoras sub-agent to gather codebase context - Proceed as above with collected context
Question Rules
- One question at a time — never ask multiple at once
- Provide options when possible:
What is the primary trigger for this feature? A) User request / new requirement B) Tech debt or refactor C) Bug or incident in production D) Other (describe) - Skip if already known — if context answers a question, don't ask it
- Be critical — focus on questions that would change the approach
- Max 8 questions — stop when enough context is gathered
- Confirm before proceeding — summarize gathered context and ask if correct
Question Bank by Goal Type
For implementation goals
- What is the expected input/output?
- What are the edge cases that must be handled?
- Are there existing similar patterns in the codebase to follow?
- What is the performance/scale requirement?
- What should NOT be changed (constraints)?
For review goals
- What specific concerns should the review focus on?
- Are there known existing issues to watch for?
- What is the acceptance criteria?
For architecture/design goals
- What are the hard constraints (performance, compat, timeline)?
- What does success look like in 6 months?
- What are you most worried about?
- Who else is affected by this decision?
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

