agentleFS
MrCipherSmithMrCipherSmith/goodai-base/skills/interviewer/SKILL.md

interviewer

Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Use when requirements are ambiguous and precise clarification is needed before proceeding with a complex task.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely.

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    When requirements are vague or ambiguous

    line 54
  3. Distinctive:

    Ask questions one at a time

    line 63
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask: "What are we working on?" (if topic not in arguments)

    line 67
  5. Very specific:

    Run context-collector as sub-agent to gather codebase context

    line 68

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<SUBAGENT-STOP> If you were dispatched as a subagent to execute a specific task, skip this skill entirely. This skill is for orchestrators and interactive session-level routing only. Proceed directly with your assigned task. </SUBAGENT-STOP>

Interviewer

Purpose

Gathers precise context through focused, critical questions before a complex skill executes. Prevents wasted work from wrong assumptions. Asks one question at a time, provides options where possible, and skips questions the context already answers.

Input schema:

topic: string           — what is being worked on
goal: string            — which skill will use these answers
context?: {             — optional, provided by calling skill
  codebase_summary?: string
  recent_changes?: string
  relevant_files?: string[]
  existing_analysis?: string
}

Output schema:

answers: [{question, answer, confidence: "certain"|"assumption"|"unknown"}]
derived_context: string   — all gathered info as one coherent block
ready_to_proceed: boolean
blockers?: string[]       — unresolved critical unknowns

When to Use

  • Called by job-orchestrator, brainstorm, feature-dev at start of Phase 0
  • Directly by user: /interviewer <topic> — runs context-collector first if no context provided
  • When requirements are vague or ambiguous

Workflow

If called by another skill (context provided)

  1. Parse input context
  2. Determine what's still unknown or ambiguous for the stated goal
  3. Decide number of questions needed (typically 2-6)
  4. Skip questions already answered by context
  5. Ask questions one at a time
  6. Produce output schema

If called directly by user (no context)

  1. Ask: "What are we working on?" (if topic not in arguments)
  2. Run context-collector as sub-agent to gather codebase context
  3. Proceed as above with collected context

Question Rules

  • One question at a time — never ask multiple at once
  • Provide options when possible:
    What is the primary trigger for this feature?
    A) User request / new requirement
    B) Tech debt or refactor
    C) Bug or incident in production
    D) Other (describe)
  • Skip if already known — if context answers a question, don't ask it
  • Be critical — focus on questions that would change the approach
  • Max 8 questions — stop when enough context is gathered
  • Confirm before proceeding — summarize gathered context and ask if correct

Question Bank by Goal Type

For implementation goals

  • What is the expected input/output?
  • What are the edge cases that must be handled?
  • Are there existing similar patterns in the codebase to follow?
  • What is the performance/scale requirement?
  • What should NOT be changed (constraints)?

For review goals

  • What specific concerns should the review focus on?
  • Are there known existing issues to watch for?
  • What is the acceptance criteria?

For architecture/design goals

  • What are the hard constraints (performance, compat, timeline)?
  • What does success look like in 6 months?
  • What are you most worried about?
  • Who else is affected by this decision?

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.