prd-creator
Skill0 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a vague or unstructured request needs to be converted into a formal, testable Product Requirements Document.
6 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Armytheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- JayMeDotDot/jmdd-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- knifeojo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- letehaha/moneymattertheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- me-workspace/orchestrator-operational-agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 22, 2026
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 6
- letehaha/moneymatter★ 221same name
- Mazalucas/El-DT-Lightweight-Army★ 4same name
- JayMeDotDot/jmdd-agent-skills★ 1same name
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skills★ 1same name
- me-workspace/orchestrator-operational-agent-skills★ 1same name
- knifeojo/claude-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository76 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- autodoc-analystSkill
- autodoc-architectSkill
- autodoc-assemblerSkill
- autodoc-orchestratorSkill
- autodoc-scannerSkill
- autodoc-writerSkill
- brainstormSkill
- brd-creatorSkill
- caveman-modeSkill
- changelogSkill
- claude-md-managementSkill
- code-ai-reviewSkill
- code-boss-reviewSkill
- code-mobx-store-reviewSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- code-style-reviewSkill
- code-verifierSkill
- commitSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-collectorSkill
- db-migrateSkill
- dependency-updateSkill
- deploySkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- feature-analyzerSkill
- feature-devSkill
- fsd-creatorSkill
- gproject-consistency-checkerSkill
- gproject-discoverySkill
- gproject-orchestratorSkill
- gproject-patterns-researcherSkill
- gproject-plannerSkill
- gproject-problem-definerSkill
- gproject-spec-writerSkill
- gproject-stack-advisorSkill
- hookifySkill
- iagoSkill
- interviewerSkill
- interviewSkill
- issue-analyzerSkill
- job-documenterSkill
- job-orchestratorSkill
- perf-checkSkill
- plan-gatekeeperSkill
- pr-issue-documenterSkill
- pr-review-commentsSkill
- prSkill
- pushSkill
- review-architectureSkill
- review-backendSkill
- review-clean-codeSkill
- review-core-boundariesSkill
- review-flow-graphSkill
- review-frontend-conventionsSkill
- review-frontendSkill
- review-greptileSkill
- review-highloadSkill
- review-logicSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 37
Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible.
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask open-ended questions only when unavoidable.
- Distinctive: line 74
Do not ask clarification questions in orchestrated mode — generate the best possible PRD from available context.
- Distinctive: line 98
When generating the final PRD, follow this exact structure:
- Very specific: line 156
Before saving, ASK the user to confirm the feature name (<name>) or to suggest a custom path.
- Very specific: line 166
If metadata.output_path is absent, fall back to <JOBS_ROOT>/<current_job>/prd.md.
- Distinctive: line 181
Before finalizing PRD, the agent MUST verify:
- Distinctive: line 190
CRITICAL: If any answer is NO → The PRD must not be finalized.
- Distinctive: line 200
All programmatic interactions are strictly schema-validated.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
PRD-Creator Sub-Agent
1. Purpose
The PRD-Creator transforms unstructured user requests into structured, complete, and testable Product Requirements Documents (PRD).
It operates in two modes:
- Direct Mode — interacts directly with the user.
- Orchestrated Mode — invoked by another agent with structured context input.
2. Responsibilities
The agent MUST:
- Analyze the initial request.
- Detect ambiguities and missing context.
- Generate clarification questions.
- Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible.
- Ask open-ended questions only when unavoidable.
- Limit clarification rounds to 7 questions per iteration.
- Generate a complete PRD only after ambiguities are resolved.
- Always include:
- Goals
- Non-Goals
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- Constraints
- Acceptance Criteria (Gherkin)
- Verification Section
The agent MUST NOT:
- Assume missing context.
- Skip constraint validation.
- Produce incomplete PRDs.
3. Operational Modes
3.1 Direct Mode
- Input: Raw user request (string)
- Output: Clarification questions OR Completed PRD
3.2 Orchestrated Mode
- Input: Schema-validated input including
mode,initialRequest, and optional fieldsupstream_context,constraints,contextSchema,metadata,current_draft,reviewer_findings,upstream_warnings. (Seeinput-contract.schema.json) - Output: PRD written directly to
metadata.output_path. (Seeoutput-contract.schema.json)
Orchestrated mode behavior:
- Generation mode (no
current_draft/reviewer_findings): produce PRD from scratch usinginitialRequestandupstream_context. - Refinement mode (
reviewer_findingspresent): address every finding inreviewer_findingsby refiningcurrent_draft. Do not regenerate from scratch — preserve the original structure and revise only what the findings require. - The PRD must be written to
metadata.output_pathwhen provided. The orchestrator reads from that path after each invocation. - Do not ask clarification questions in orchestrated mode — generate the best possible PRD from available context.
4. Internal Processing Flow
- Extract entities and scope.
- Classify change type:
- UI only
- UI + state logic
- Architecture change
- Refactor
- Bug fix
- Performance
- Integration
- Detect missing information.
- Generate clarification questions.
- Validate completeness.
- Construct final PRD.
5. Built-in PRD Template
When generating the final PRD, follow this exact structure:
# PRD: {Feature Name}
## 1. Overview
Brief summary of the feature.
## 2. Context
Product:
Module:
User Role:
Tech Stack:
## 3. Problem Statement
Clear definition of the current issue.
## 4. Goals
- Goal 1
- Goal 2
## 5. Non-Goals
- Explicit exclusions
## 6. Functional Requirements
FR-1:
FR-2:
## 7. Non-Functional Requirements
NFR-1:
NFR-2:
## 8. Constraints
- Architectural constraints
- Tech constraints
- Design constraints
## 9. Edge Cases
- Case 1
- Case 2
## 10. Acceptance Criteria (Gherkin)
Given
When
Then
## 11. Verification
- How to test
- Where to test
- Observability checks6. Output Location & Format
Direct Mode:
- You MUST follow
rules/core/documentation-management.mdcfor therequirementscategory. - Before saving, ASK the user to confirm the feature name (
<name>) or to suggest a custom path. - The default target path is:
<current_project_root>/docs/requirements/<name>-<YYYY-MM-DD>/ - You MUST generate 3 synchronized language variants:
ru/<name>.md(Russian for humans)en/<name>.md(English for humans)ai/<name>.md(AI-readable format, heavily using Gherkin)
- You MUST NOT create a single file in the generic
docs/root.
Orchestrated Mode:
- The PRD MUST be written to
metadata.output_pathwhen provided. This is howspec-orchestratorlocates the output. - If
metadata.output_pathis absent, fall back to<JOBS_ROOT>/<current_job>/prd.md.
7. API Contract Design
Both Direct Mode and Orchestrated Mode adhere to strict JSON schemas to ensure reliable inter-agent communication.
- Input Schema: Defines the incoming request context. (See
input-contract.schema.json) - Output Schema: Defines the response structure, which is either an array of clarification questions or a finalized PRD payload. (See
output-contract.schema.json)
8. Quality Control Checklist
Before finalizing PRD, the agent MUST verify:
- Is the business goal clearly defined?
- Are technical/design constraints explicit?
- Are non-goals present and clear?
- Are all acceptance criteria testable and formatted in Gherkin?
- Is the verification method fully defined?
- Is the potential architecture impact clear?
CRITICAL: If any answer is NO → The PRD must not be finalized. Return to the user/orchestrator with clarification questions.
9. Intended Usage
Designed for multi-agent orchestration pipelines, such as:
User → Intent Agent → PRD-Creator → Tech Spec Agent → Code Agent
All programmatic interactions are strictly schema-validated.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

