agentleFS
MegapromptingMegaprompting/torque-loop/skills/push/SKILL.md

push

Skill10 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Push the boundary after a safe version already exists. Use to find the boldest adjacent move that could multiply the result without turning it into fantasy. Returns the safe default, the boundary-pushing path, why it might work, why it might be stupid, the cheapest experiment that distinguishes them, the version to try, and the first irreversible move. Controlled aggression, never recklessness.

49 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use get-pr-reviews, push-everything and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • saffron-healthSkill

    get-pr-reviews

    Get nicely formatted output of the last review comments on a PR. Used internally by other skills.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • saffron-healthSkill

    push-everything

    Stage ALL changes in the repository (not just session changes), commit, and push. Use when you need to commit all pending changes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • NVIDIASkill

    generate-spec

    Produce a feature specification covering API changes, backward compatibility, cross-language impact, performance, and a file-level change plan. Use when designing a new feature, planning a significant change, or the user asks to spec something out.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • ddehartSkill

    knowledge-graph

    Search, capture, and query the claude-code-plugins knowledge graph. Use when asked to "capture this", "add this to the graph", "what do we know about X", "update the graph", "check the graph for X", or when a decision, pattern, or non-obvious fact surfaces mid-session that's worth recording. Also: "log an observation", "what patterns do we have about skill triggering", "any decisions on the knowledge-commons plugin", "what do we know about the commit-creator agent".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • anombyte93Skill

    discover

    Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    merge

    Merge changes from the topic branch to the merge base branch. Use when the user wants to merge their session's work back to the base branch.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from saffron-health

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Only run this after a safe, tested artifact exists.

    line 18

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/ratchet:push — the boundary push

Once the safe version exists, the question changes from "does it work?" to "how much more is on the table?" This command finds the edge where information gain is highest — the bold adjacent move that could multiply the result — without tipping into fantasy.

Step 0 — Load state

ratchet status

Only run this after a safe, tested artifact exists. Pushing an unbuilt idea is not aggression; it is avoidance.

Procedure

Given the current artifact or plan, return:

  1. Safe default path — the conservative version you already have or would ship.
  2. Boundary-pushing path — the boldest adjacent move that could multiply the result.
  3. Why it might work — the mechanism that would make the upside real.
  4. Why it might be stupid — the honest failure case; the way it turns into fantasy.
  5. Cheapest distinguishing experiment — the smallest test that tells you which path is real before you commit to either.
  6. The version to try — your pick, stated.
  7. First irreversible move — the action that commits you and can't be trivially undone.

Rules

  • Not reckless, not timid. Reckless ignores the failure case; timid never leaves the safe path. Aim for the edge where information gain per unit of risk is highest.
  • The boundary path must have a real mechanism, not just ambition. If you can't say why it would work, it's fantasy — mark it so.

Output contract

SAFE DEFAULT: <path>
BOUNDARY PATH: <bold adjacent move>
WHY IT WORKS: <mechanism>
WHY IT'S STUPID: <honest failure case>
DISTINGUISHING EXPERIMENT: <cheapest test>
VERSION TO TRY: <pick>
FIRST IRREVERSIBLE MOVE: <the committing action>

Serialize

Record the push as a decision with a built-in reversal tripwire:

ratchet state append decisions '{"choice":"push: <boundary path>","rejected":"safe default","tripwire":"<signal the experiment fails>"}'
ratchet state set phase decide

Next: /ratchet:build the distinguishing experiment first. The experiment is cheaper than the commitment — run it before the irreversible move.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.