sdd-tasks
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Break down a change into an implementation task checklist. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update the task breakdown for a change.
10 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mariano-aguero/spec-driven-development-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GabrielaStark/starktheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- svg153/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- monaccode/astromesh-sddtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- PedroMosquera/squadaitheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- felipefontoura/pi-sdd-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sdd-plan and sdd-specify.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
felipefontouraSkillsdd-plan
Cognitive SDD skill for creating or updating optional PLAN.md from captured ideas or project goals. Use when the conversation calls for roadmap, personas, feature mapping, phases, dependencies, and open decisions before requirements, even without an explicit command. Do not use for feature-level requirements or coding.
Also in 5 projects that use this
pchemguySkillsdd-specify
Use when creating, reviewing, or revising docs/dev/SPEC.md, focused specification children, or FEATURE-SPEC.md; defining required software behavior, interfaces, data contracts, error semantics, invariants, and objective acceptance for a new or existing system.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- svg153/skills★ 135% same
Wrote their own version · 8
- felipefontoura/pi-sdd-kit★ 36same name
- khangpqvn/SDDADD★ 12same name
- mariano-aguero/spec-driven-development-skill★ 11same name
- PedroMosquera/squadai★ 10same name
- GabrielaStark/SDD★ 1same name
- GabrielaStark/stark★ 1same name
- monaccode/astromesh-sdd★ 0same name
- pchemguy/Skill-SDD-Manager★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-team-orchestratorSkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-archiveSkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-initSkill
- sdd-proposeSkill
- sdd-specSkill
- sdd-verifySkill
- skill-registrySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
9
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
- Very specific: line 26
If mode is engram:
- Very specific: line 49
If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
- Very specific: line 50
If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write tasks.md to filesystem.
- Very specific: line 51
If mode is none: Return result only.
- Very specific: line 60
If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
- Distinctive: line 61
If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
- Very specific: line 68
All files that need to be created/modified/deleted
- Distinctive: line 74
Create the task file:
- Very specific: line 163
If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 3.
- Very specific: line 165
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
- Distinctive: line 167
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-apply) will NOT be able to find your tasks and the pipeline BREAKS.
- Distinctive: line 196
ALWAYS reference concrete file paths in tasks
- Distinctive: line 200
Use hierarchical numbering: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, etc.
- Distinctive: line 201
NEVER include vague tasks like "implement feature" or "add tests"
- Distinctive: line 203
If the project uses TDD, integrate test-first tasks: RED task (write failing test) → GREEN task (make it pass) → REFACTOR task (clean up)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for creating the TASK BREAKDOWN. You take the proposal, specs, and design, then produce a tasks.md with concrete, actionable implementation steps organized by phase.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name
- Artifact store mode (
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)
Execution and Persistence Contract
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
If mode is
engram:Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):
mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", project: "{project}")→ get IDmem_get_observation(id: {id})→ full proposal (REQUIRED)mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/spec", project: "{project}")→ get IDmem_get_observation(id: {id})→ full spec (REQUIRED)mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/design", project: "{project}")→ get IDmem_get_observation(id: {id})→ full design (REQUIRED)
Save your artifact:
mem_save( title: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks", topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks", type: "architecture", project: "{project}", content: "{your full tasks markdown}" )topic_keyenables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.(See
skills/_shared/engram-convention.mdfor full naming conventions.)- If mode is
openspec: Read and followskills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. - If mode is
hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND writetasks.mdto filesystem. Retrieve dependencies from Engram (primary) with filesystem fallback. - If mode is
none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
What to Do
Step 1: Load Skill Registry
Do this FIRST, before any other work.
- Try engram first:
mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}")→ if found,mem_get_observation(id)for the full registry - If engram not available or not found: read
.atl/skill-registry.mdfrom the project root - If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.
Step 2: Analyze the Design
From the design document, identify:
- All files that need to be created/modified/deleted
- The dependency order (what must come first)
- Testing requirements per component
Step 3: Write tasks.md
Create the task file:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md
├── specs/
├── design.md
└── tasks.md ← You create thisTask File Format
# Tasks: {Change Title}
## Phase 1: {Phase Name} (e.g., Infrastructure / Foundation)
- [ ] 1.1 {Concrete action — what file, what change}
- [ ] 1.2 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 1.3 {Concrete action}
## Phase 2: {Phase Name} (e.g., Core Implementation)
- [ ] 2.1 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.2 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.3 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.4 {Concrete action}
## Phase 3: {Phase Name} (e.g., Testing / Verification)
- [ ] 3.1 {Write tests for ...}
- [ ] 3.2 {Write tests for ...}
- [ ] 3.3 {Verify integration between ...}
## Phase 4: {Phase Name} (e.g., Cleanup / Documentation)
- [ ] 4.1 {Update docs/comments}
- [ ] 4.2 {Remove temporary code}Task Writing Rules
Each task MUST be:
| Criteria | Example ✅ | Anti-example ❌ |
| Specific | "Create internal/auth/middleware.go with JWT validation" | "Add auth" |
| Actionable | "Add ValidateToken() method to AuthService" | "Handle tokens" |
| Verifiable | "Test: POST /login returns 401 without token" | "Make sure it works" |
| Small | One file or one logical unit of work | "Implement the feature" |
Phase Organization Guidelines
Phase 1: Foundation / Infrastructure
└─ New types, interfaces, database changes, config
└─ Things other tasks depend on
Phase 2: Core Implementation
└─ Main logic, business rules, core behavior
└─ The meat of the change
Phase 3: Integration / Wiring
└─ Connect components, routes, UI wiring
└─ Make everything work together
Phase 4: Testing
└─ Unit tests, integration tests, e2e tests
└─ Verify against spec scenarios
Phase 5: Cleanup (if needed)
└─ Documentation, remove dead code, polishStep 4: Persist Artifact
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
If mode is engram:
mem_save(
title: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
type: "architecture",
project: "{project}",
content: "{your full tasks markdown from Step 3}"
)If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 3.
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-apply) will NOT be able to find your tasks and the pipeline BREAKS.
Step 5: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Tasks Created
**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/tasks.md
### Breakdown
| Phase | Tasks | Focus |
|-------|-------|-------|
| Phase 1 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Phase 2 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Phase 3 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Total | {N} | |
### Implementation Order
{Brief description of the recommended order and why}
### Next Step
Ready for implementation (sdd-apply).Rules
- ALWAYS reference concrete file paths in tasks
- Tasks MUST be ordered by dependency — Phase 1 tasks shouldn't depend on Phase 2
- Testing tasks should reference specific scenarios from the specs
- Each task should be completable in ONE session (if a task feels too big, split it)
- Use hierarchical numbering: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, etc.
- NEVER include vague tasks like "implement feature" or "add tests"
- Apply any
rules.tasksfromopenspec/config.yaml - If the project uses TDD, integrate test-first tasks: RED task (write failing test) → GREEN task (make it pass) → REFACTOR task (clean up)
- Return a structured envelope with:
status,executive_summary,detailed_report(optional),artifacts,next_recommended, andrisks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

