agentleFS
MaicololiverasMaicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestrator/skills/sdd-tasks/SKILL.md

sdd-tasks

Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Break down a change into an implementation task checklist. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update the task breakdown for a change.

10 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use sdd-plan and sdd-specify.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • felipefontouraSkill

    sdd-plan

    Cognitive SDD skill for creating or updating optional PLAN.md from captured ideas or project goals. Use when the conversation calls for roadmap, personas, feature mapping, phases, dependencies, and open decisions before requirements, even without an explicit command. Do not use for feature-level requirements or coding.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • pchemguySkill

    sdd-specify

    Use when creating, reviewing, or revising docs/dev/SPEC.md, focused specification children, or FEATURE-SPEC.md; defining required software behavior, interfaces, data contracts, error semantics, invariants, and objective acceptance for a new or existing system.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

16 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 9 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 7

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 9

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

    line 24
  2. Very specific:

    If mode is engram:

    line 26
  3. Very specific:

    If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.

    line 49
  4. Very specific:

    If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write tasks.md to filesystem.

    line 50
  5. Very specific:

    If mode is none: Return result only.

    line 51
  6. Very specific:

    If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root

    line 60
  7. Distinctive:

    If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)

    line 61
  8. Very specific:

    All files that need to be created/modified/deleted

    line 68
  9. Distinctive:

    Create the task file:

    line 74
  10. Very specific:

    If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 3.

    line 163
  11. Very specific:

    If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).

    line 165
  12. Distinctive:

    If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-apply) will NOT be able to find your tasks and the pipeline BREAKS.

    line 167
  13. Distinctive:

    ALWAYS reference concrete file paths in tasks

    line 196
  14. Distinctive:

    Use hierarchical numbering: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, etc.

    line 200
  15. Distinctive:

    NEVER include vague tasks like "implement feature" or "add tests"

    line 201
  16. Distinctive:

    If the project uses TDD, integrate test-first tasks: RED task (write failing test) → GREEN task (make it pass) → REFACTOR task (clean up)

    line 203

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for creating the TASK BREAKDOWN. You take the proposal, specs, and design, then produce a tasks.md with concrete, actionable implementation steps organized by phase.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | hybrid | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

  • If mode is engram:

    Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):

    1. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", project: "{project}") → get ID
    2. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full proposal (REQUIRED)
    3. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/spec", project: "{project}") → get ID
    4. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full spec (REQUIRED)
    5. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/design", project: "{project}") → get ID
    6. mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full design (REQUIRED)

    Save your artifact:

    mem_save(
      title: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
      topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
      type: "architecture",
      project: "{project}",
      content: "{your full tasks markdown}"
    )

    topic_key enables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.

    (See skills/_shared/engram-convention.md for full naming conventions.)

  • If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
  • If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write tasks.md to filesystem. Retrieve dependencies from Engram (primary) with filesystem fallback.
  • If mode is none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.

What to Do

Step 1: Load Skill Registry

Do this FIRST, before any other work.

  1. Try engram first: mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}") → if found, mem_get_observation(id) for the full registry
  2. If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
  3. If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)

From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.

Step 2: Analyze the Design

From the design document, identify:

  • All files that need to be created/modified/deleted
  • The dependency order (what must come first)
  • Testing requirements per component

Step 3: Write tasks.md

Create the task file:

openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md
├── specs/
├── design.md
└── tasks.md               ← You create this

Task File Format

# Tasks: {Change Title}

## Phase 1: {Phase Name} (e.g., Infrastructure / Foundation)

- [ ] 1.1 {Concrete action — what file, what change}
- [ ] 1.2 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 1.3 {Concrete action}

## Phase 2: {Phase Name} (e.g., Core Implementation)

- [ ] 2.1 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.2 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.3 {Concrete action}
- [ ] 2.4 {Concrete action}

## Phase 3: {Phase Name} (e.g., Testing / Verification)

- [ ] 3.1 {Write tests for ...}
- [ ] 3.2 {Write tests for ...}
- [ ] 3.3 {Verify integration between ...}

## Phase 4: {Phase Name} (e.g., Cleanup / Documentation)

- [ ] 4.1 {Update docs/comments}
- [ ] 4.2 {Remove temporary code}

Task Writing Rules

Each task MUST be:

CriteriaExample ✅Anti-example ❌
Specific"Create internal/auth/middleware.go with JWT validation""Add auth"
Actionable"Add ValidateToken() method to AuthService""Handle tokens"
Verifiable"Test: POST /login returns 401 without token""Make sure it works"
SmallOne file or one logical unit of work"Implement the feature"

Phase Organization Guidelines

Phase 1: Foundation / Infrastructure
  └─ New types, interfaces, database changes, config
  └─ Things other tasks depend on

Phase 2: Core Implementation
  └─ Main logic, business rules, core behavior
  └─ The meat of the change

Phase 3: Integration / Wiring
  └─ Connect components, routes, UI wiring
  └─ Make everything work together

Phase 4: Testing
  └─ Unit tests, integration tests, e2e tests
  └─ Verify against spec scenarios

Phase 5: Cleanup (if needed)
  └─ Documentation, remove dead code, polish

Step 4: Persist Artifact

This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.

If mode is engram:

mem_save(
  title: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
  topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/tasks",
  type: "architecture",
  project: "{project}",
  content: "{your full tasks markdown from Step 3}"
)

If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 3.

If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).

If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-apply) will NOT be able to find your tasks and the pipeline BREAKS.

Step 5: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

## Tasks Created

**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/tasks.md

### Breakdown
| Phase | Tasks | Focus |
|-------|-------|-------|
| Phase 1 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Phase 2 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Phase 3 | {N} | {Phase name} |
| Total | {N} | |

### Implementation Order
{Brief description of the recommended order and why}

### Next Step
Ready for implementation (sdd-apply).

Rules

  • ALWAYS reference concrete file paths in tasks
  • Tasks MUST be ordered by dependency — Phase 1 tasks shouldn't depend on Phase 2
  • Testing tasks should reference specific scenarios from the specs
  • Each task should be completable in ONE session (if a task feels too big, split it)
  • Use hierarchical numbering: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2, etc.
  • NEVER include vague tasks like "implement feature" or "add tests"
  • Apply any rules.tasks from openspec/config.yaml
  • If the project uses TDD, integrate test-first tasks: RED task (write failing test) → GREEN task (make it pass) → REFACTOR task (clean up)
  • Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.