agentleFS
pchemguypchemguy/Skill-SDD-Manager/skills/sdd-specify/SKILL.md

sdd-specify

Skill0 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when creating, reviewing, or revising docs/dev/SPEC.md, focused specification children, or FEATURE-SPEC.md; defining required software behavior, interfaces, data contracts, error semantics, invariants, and objective acceptance for a new or existing system.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Specify required behavior

Choose the requested operation and load only its reference. Enter directly when adequate decisions and project evidence exist; do not replay design exploration as ceremony.

Apply sdd-conventions' Development-document QC reference (skills/sdd-conventions/references/development-document-qc.md, bundled dependency). Authoring includes scoped review, correction/recheck and the adjacent report before dependent progression; pure review does not authorize corrections.

WorkLoad
Create or revise the complete intended system specificationsystem specification
Define a scoped change to existing specified behaviorchange specification
Review SPEC quality and identify conflictsreview

Before authoring, identify accepted decisions and the relevant PROJECT, ARCHITECTURE, DECOMPOSITION, existing SPEC, and applicable focused children. For an existing implementation, inspect only relevant code and tests to establish observed behavior; do not promote an observation into a requirement without an accepted decision. If a material architectural boundary is undecided or governing sources conflict, return that decision to design or the user rather than inventing a contract.

Read-only review can proceed without modifying files. Creating, revising, or removing project documents requires sdd-manage to coordinate the user's request and a current sdd-orient handoff establishing an eligible Git worktree, applicable instructions, affected paths, and ownership of dirty changes. This skill does not implement orientation or authorize another workflow.

SPEC is authoritative for intended observable behavior and acceptance. PROJECT owns the brief; ARCHITECTURE and DECOMPOSITION own structural design; PLAN owns delivery strategy; TASKS and an active FEATURE-TASKS own their respective executable units; layout owns physical paths. Use sdd-conventions when evaluating contract boundaries and necessary decomposition, without moving those shared checks into SPEC procedure. A feature specification states a scoped intended delta; it does not silently replace the complete main SPEC.

Incorporation of an accepted FEATURE-SPEC into main SPEC belongs to sdd-integrate-feature. Direct SPEC corrections remain in the owning system specification workflow.

Report the behavior specified or changed, affected contracts and acceptance conditions, unresolved material questions, and the precise documents inspected or updated. Document work does not authorize code changes, task selection, or continuation into implementation.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.