sdd-verify
Skill0 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when selecting and running checks for an SDD task, selected change, milestone, phase, or project; assessing acceptance and exit-condition coverage; classifying observed failures; performing read-only milestone/phase implementation code review, or returning verification evidence and remaining gaps before completion.
5 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- svg153/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- monaccode/astromesh-sddtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- PedroMosquera/squadaitheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- callingcard1973/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 17, 2026
- Maicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestratortheir own version, first seen Mar 16, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 5
- PedroMosquera/squadai★ 10same name
- Maicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestrator★ 1same name
- svg153/skills★ 1same name
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 0same name
- monaccode/astromesh-sdd★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- sdd-conventionsSkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-docsSkill
- sdd-forgeSkill
- sdd-implementSkill
- sdd-integrate-featureSkill
- sdd-manageSkill
- sdd-orientSkill
- sdd-planSkill
- sdd-reportSkill
- sdd-specifySkill
- sdd-steerSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- sdd-tddSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Run the selected checks and inspect actual outcomes, including failures, warnings, skips, and collection counts where relevant.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Verify a selected work boundary
Establish the requested task, change, milestone, phase, or project scope. Load the relevant references:
| Work | Load |
| Review milestone/phase implementation code and findings | boundary review |
| Derive checks from requirements, changes, and dependencies | check selection |
| Execute checks and assess acceptance evidence | execution and evidence |
| Classify failures and return unresolved work | failure assessment |
Use a current sdd-orient handoff for governing instructions, Git state, dirty-path ownership, relevant documents, and declared commands. sdd-manage coordinates the requested scope and execution prerequisites; the active implementation workflow, sdd-implement for main task work or sdd-steer for a checkpoint amendment, requests verification within its boundary. Read the owning TASKS or FEATURE-TASKS, relevant SPEC contracts, PLAN exit conditions, design and layout, actual changes, tests, and existing evidence as needed. Read-only check planning can precede execution; commands with side effects require the established eligible Git worktree and authorized environment.
For an explicit boundary review task, load boundary review and assess implementation code separately from test execution. Neither activity substitutes for the other. Return findings and recheck evidence without repairs or task/hosted state changes.
- Identify the acceptance and exit conditions to verify and the implementation state being checked.
- Select sufficient direct, dependent, integration, and boundary checks. Use project commands and an existing verification map where useful; neither a map nor new scripts are required.
- Run the selected checks and inspect actual outcomes, including failures, warnings, skips, and collection counts where relevant.
- Associate each condition with evidence and any limitation. Distinguish verified, failed, blocked, and not checked conditions; passing checks do not establish acceptance they never exercised.
- Classify observed failures where evidence permits and return remaining work to its owner. Do not silently omit an unrelated or pre-existing failure from the results.
sdd-tdd owns testing strategy and test design or changes; this skill assesses coverage and executes the verification campaign. sdd-docs owns documentation maintenance. The active implementation workflow owns repairs, completion checkboxes, commits, pushes, and issue-closure coordination. Leave source, tests, governing documents, and task status unchanged during verification; report necessary changes rather than repairing them here. Account for command-generated artifacts and preserve unrelated pending work.
Return the boundary and implementation state, conditions assessed, check selection and rationale, commands and environment, observed outcomes and evidence locations, failure classifications, omitted or blocked checks, and remaining gaps. sdd-report owns presentation of these facts. Existing task evidence or a project-designated record may hold durable results; no separate verification journal is required. State when the selected conditions are verified without equating that finding with task completion or whole-project correctness.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

