agentleFS
pchemguypchemguy/Skill-SDD-Manager/skills/sdd-report/SKILL.md

sdd-report

Skill0 starsChanged 37 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when drafting a task issue, Git commit message, pull request description, or evidence-backed task, milestone, phase or final implementation report, or review/revision campaign plan or report for an SDD project. Adapt the summary to feature, bug, code health, performance, security, testing, documentation, integration, or compatibility work without inventing results.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. duviolin/sdd-kit★ 0same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Report SDD work

Choose the requested output and load only its reference:

OutputLoad
First SDD commit disclosure/usage evidence (drafting only)sdd-manage: skills/sdd-manage/references/repository-bootstrap.md (bundled dependency)
Planned task issue title and body, task/amendment or merge commit message, or pull request draftdrafts for hosted and Git objects
Task, milestone, phase, final implementation, branch boundary, or interrupted-work status reportcompletion reports
Adjacent SPEC/PLAN/TASKS preparation QC reports and appended correction/recheck sectionsdocument QC reports
Review plan/report or revision plan/report, including focused prompt-driven reviewcampaign artifacts
Kind-specific emphasis and reusable What, Why, Verification, Result patternschange kinds

Use the owning TASKS or active FEATURE-TASKS entry, applicable design, SPEC, PLAN, and layout, actual changes, verification output, and Git evidence appropriate to the requested output. Obtain hosted issue references from sdd-forge when available; a guessed issue number is never acceptable. Separate planned, performed, verified, and blocked statements. State missing or limited evidence plainly; do not turn an example, unchecked task, or intended benchmark into a completed result. Follow project-specific title and reporting conventions where they exist.

Compose only the requested text or structured draft. Keep a concise shared core of What, Why, Verification, and Result, varying the labels and optional sections to suit the actual change. For a planned issue, Verification is an acceptance or check plan and Result is an intended outcome, not a completed claim. Emoji labels are optional presentation, not required metadata. For Markdown output, separate each heading from adjacent content with blank lines; a heading at the start needs no preceding blank line.

This skill drafts reports and messages. The active implementation or steering workflow owns its work commits and task status; sdd-manage coordinates other persistence and explicit boundary merges, sdd-forge owns hosted issue/milestone mutations, and any future PR workflow owns PR creation or merge. A draft does not grant authorization for those actions or establish task completion. Return the draft, source task IDs and issue references actually resolved, evidence used, and any facts still needed before publication.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.