sdd-propose
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create a change proposal with intent, scope, and approach. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update a proposal for a change.
3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- svg153/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- PedroMosquera/squadaitheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- callingcard1973/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Apr 17, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- svg153/skills★ 130% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- PedroMosquera/squadai★ 10same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-team-orchestratorSkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-archiveSkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-initSkill
- sdd-specSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- sdd-verifySkill
- skill-registrySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
12
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 25
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
- Very specific: line 27
If mode is engram:
- Very specific: line 31
If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full exploration content
- Very specific: line 33
If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full project context
- Very specific: line 48
If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
- Very specific: line 49
If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write to filesystem.
- Very specific: line 50
If mode is none: Return result only.
- Very specific: line 51
Never force openspec/ creation unless user requested file-based persistence or mode is hybrid.
- Very specific: line 60
If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
- Distinctive: line 61
If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
- Distinctive: line 67
Create the change folder structure:
- Very specific: line 76
If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.
- Very specific: line 145
If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.
- Very specific: line 147
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
- Distinctive: line 149
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-spec) will NOT be able to find your proposal and the pipeline BREAKS.
- Distinctive: line 174
If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it
- Distinctive: line 175
Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel
- Distinctive: line 176
Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan
- Distinctive: line 177
Every proposal MUST have success criteria
- Distinctive: line 178
Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for creating PROPOSALS. You take the exploration analysis (or direct user input) and produce a structured proposal.md document inside the change folder.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name (e.g., "add-dark-mode")
- Exploration analysis (from sdd-explore) OR direct user description
- Artifact store mode (
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)
Execution and Persistence Contract
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
If mode is
engram:Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):
mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/explore", project: "{project}")→ get observation ID (optional — may not exist)- If found:
mem_get_observation(id: {id})→ full exploration content mem_search(query: "sdd-init/{project}", project: "{project}")→ project context (optional)- If found:
mem_get_observation(id: {id})→ full project context
Save your artifact:
mem_save( title: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", type: "architecture", project: "{project}", content: "{your full proposal markdown}" )topic_keyenables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.(See
skills/_shared/engram-convention.mdfor full naming conventions.)- If mode is
openspec: Read and followskills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. - If mode is
hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write to filesystem. Retrieve dependencies from Engram (primary) with filesystem fallback. - If mode is
none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files. - Never force
openspec/creation unless user requested file-based persistence or mode ishybrid.
What to Do
Step 1: Load Skill Registry
Do this FIRST, before any other work.
- Try engram first:
mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}")→ if found,mem_get_observation(id)for the full registry - If engram not available or not found: read
.atl/skill-registry.mdfrom the project root - If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.
Step 2: Create Change Directory
Create the change folder structure:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
└── proposal.mdStep 3: Read Existing Specs
If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.
Step 4: Write proposal.md
# Proposal: {Change Title}
## Intent
{What problem are we solving? Why does this change need to happen?
Be specific about the user need or technical debt being addressed.}
## Scope
### In Scope
- {Concrete deliverable 1}
- {Concrete deliverable 2}
- {Concrete deliverable 3}
### Out of Scope
- {What we're explicitly NOT doing}
- {Future work that's related but deferred}
## Approach
{High-level technical approach. How will we solve this?
Reference the recommended approach from exploration if available.}
## Affected Areas
| Area | Impact | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| `path/to/area` | New/Modified/Removed | {What changes} |
## Risks
| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation |
|------|------------|------------|
| {Risk description} | Low/Med/High | {How we mitigate} |
## Rollback Plan
{How to revert if something goes wrong. Be specific.}
## Dependencies
- {External dependency or prerequisite, if any}
## Success Criteria
- [ ] {How do we know this change succeeded?}
- [ ] {Measurable outcome}Step 5: Persist Artifact
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
If mode is engram:
mem_save(
title: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
type: "architecture",
project: "{project}",
content: "{your full proposal markdown from Step 4}"
)If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-spec) will NOT be able to find your proposal and the pipeline BREAKS.
Step 6: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Proposal Created
**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/proposal.md
### Summary
- **Intent**: {one-line summary}
- **Scope**: {N deliverables in, M items deferred}
- **Approach**: {one-line approach}
- **Risk Level**: {Low/Medium/High}
### Next Step
Ready for specs (sdd-spec) or design (sdd-design).Rules
- In
openspecmode, ALWAYS create theproposal.mdfile - If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it
- Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel
- Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan
- Every proposal MUST have success criteria
- Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible
- Apply any
rules.proposalfromopenspec/config.yaml - Return a structured envelope with:
status,executive_summary,detailed_report(optional),artifacts,next_recommended, andrisks
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

