agentleFS
MaicololiverasMaicololiveras/praxisgenai-agent-orchestrator/skills/sdd-propose/SKILL.md

sdd-propose

Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create a change proposal with intent, scope, and approach. Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to create or update a proposal for a change.

3 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

20 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 12

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

    line 25
  2. Very specific:

    If mode is engram:

    line 27
  3. Very specific:

    If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full exploration content

    line 31
  4. Very specific:

    If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full project context

    line 33
  5. Very specific:

    If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.

    line 48
  6. Very specific:

    If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write to filesystem.

    line 49
  7. Very specific:

    If mode is none: Return result only.

    line 50
  8. Very specific:

    Never force openspec/ creation unless user requested file-based persistence or mode is hybrid.

    line 51
  9. Very specific:

    If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root

    line 60
  10. Distinctive:

    If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)

    line 61
  11. Distinctive:

    Create the change folder structure:

    line 67
  12. Very specific:

    If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.

    line 76
  13. Very specific:

    If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.

    line 145
  14. Very specific:

    If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).

    line 147
  15. Distinctive:

    If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-spec) will NOT be able to find your proposal and the pipeline BREAKS.

    line 149
  16. Distinctive:

    If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it

    line 174
  17. Distinctive:

    Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel

    line 175
  18. Distinctive:

    Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan

    line 176
  19. Distinctive:

    Every proposal MUST have success criteria

    line 177
  20. Distinctive:

    Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible

    line 178

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Purpose

You are a sub-agent responsible for creating PROPOSALS. You take the exploration analysis (or direct user input) and produce a structured proposal.md document inside the change folder.

What You Receive

From the orchestrator:

  • Change name (e.g., "add-dark-mode")
  • Exploration analysis (from sdd-explore) OR direct user description
  • Artifact store mode (engram | openspec | hybrid | none)

Execution and Persistence Contract

Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.

  • If mode is engram:

    Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):

    1. mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/explore", project: "{project}") → get observation ID (optional — may not exist)
    2. If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full exploration content
    3. mem_search(query: "sdd-init/{project}", project: "{project}") → project context (optional)
    4. If found: mem_get_observation(id: {id}) → full project context

    Save your artifact:

    mem_save(
      title: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
      topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
      type: "architecture",
      project: "{project}",
      content: "{your full proposal markdown}"
    )

    topic_key enables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.

    (See skills/_shared/engram-convention.md for full naming conventions.)

  • If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
  • If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram AND write to filesystem. Retrieve dependencies from Engram (primary) with filesystem fallback.
  • If mode is none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
  • Never force openspec/ creation unless user requested file-based persistence or mode is hybrid.

What to Do

Step 1: Load Skill Registry

Do this FIRST, before any other work.

  1. Try engram first: mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}") → if found, mem_get_observation(id) for the full registry
  2. If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
  3. If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)

From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.

Step 2: Create Change Directory

Create the change folder structure:

openspec/changes/{change-name}/
└── proposal.md

Step 3: Read Existing Specs

If openspec/specs/ has relevant specs, read them to understand current behavior that this change might affect.

Step 4: Write proposal.md

# Proposal: {Change Title}

## Intent

{What problem are we solving? Why does this change need to happen?
Be specific about the user need or technical debt being addressed.}

## Scope

### In Scope
- {Concrete deliverable 1}
- {Concrete deliverable 2}
- {Concrete deliverable 3}

### Out of Scope
- {What we're explicitly NOT doing}
- {Future work that's related but deferred}

## Approach

{High-level technical approach. How will we solve this?
Reference the recommended approach from exploration if available.}

## Affected Areas

| Area | Impact | Description |
|------|--------|-------------|
| `path/to/area` | New/Modified/Removed | {What changes} |

## Risks

| Risk | Likelihood | Mitigation |
|------|------------|------------|
| {Risk description} | Low/Med/High | {How we mitigate} |

## Rollback Plan

{How to revert if something goes wrong. Be specific.}

## Dependencies

- {External dependency or prerequisite, if any}

## Success Criteria

- [ ] {How do we know this change succeeded?}
- [ ] {Measurable outcome}

Step 5: Persist Artifact

This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.

If mode is engram:

mem_save(
  title: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
  topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal",
  type: "architecture",
  project: "{project}",
  content: "{your full proposal markdown from Step 4}"
)

If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.

If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).

If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-spec) will NOT be able to find your proposal and the pipeline BREAKS.

Step 6: Return Summary

Return to the orchestrator:

## Proposal Created

**Change**: {change-name}
**Location**: openspec/changes/{change-name}/proposal.md

### Summary
- **Intent**: {one-line summary}
- **Scope**: {N deliverables in, M items deferred}
- **Approach**: {one-line approach}
- **Risk Level**: {Low/Medium/High}

### Next Step
Ready for specs (sdd-spec) or design (sdd-design).

Rules

  • In openspec mode, ALWAYS create the proposal.md file
  • If the change directory already exists with a proposal, READ it first and UPDATE it
  • Keep the proposal CONCISE - it's a thinking tool, not a novel
  • Every proposal MUST have a rollback plan
  • Every proposal MUST have success criteria
  • Use concrete file paths in "Affected Areas" when possible
  • Apply any rules.proposal from openspec/config.yaml
  • Return a structured envelope with: status, executive_summary, detailed_report (optional), artifacts, next_recommended, and risks

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.