sdd-spec
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Write specifications with requirements and scenarios (delta specs for changes). Trigger: When the orchestrator launches you to write or update specs for a change.
6 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- svg153/skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ad1code/sdd-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- PedroMosquera/squadaitheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- felipefontoura/pi-sdd-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- khangpqvn/SDDADDtheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
- callingcard1973/claude-skillsword for word, first seen Apr 17, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use sdd-plan.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
felipefontouraSkillsdd-plan
Cognitive SDD skill for creating or updating optional PLAN.md from captured ideas or project goals. Use when the conversation calls for roadmap, personas, feature mapping, phases, dependencies, and open decisions before requirements, even without an explicit command. Do not use for feature-level requirements or coding.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions6 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- callingcard1973/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- svg153/skills★ 136% same
Wrote their own version · 4
- felipefontoura/pi-sdd-kit★ 36same name
- khangpqvn/SDDADD★ 12same name
- PedroMosquera/squadai★ 10same name
- ad1code/sdd-harness★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-team-orchestratorSkill
- sdd-applySkill
- sdd-archiveSkill
- sdd-designSkill
- sdd-exploreSkill
- sdd-initSkill
- sdd-proposeSkill
- sdd-tasksSkill
- sdd-verifySkill
- skill-registrySkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 11 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
10
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
11
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 24
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
- Very specific: line 26
If mode is engram:
- Distinctive: line 32
If specs span multiple domains, concatenate into a single artifact with domain headers.
- Very specific: line 47
If mode is openspec: Read and follow skills/_shared/openspec-convention.md.
- Very specific: line 48
If mode is hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram (single concatenated artifact) AND write domain files to filesystem.
- Very specific: line 49
If mode is none: Return result only.
- Very specific: line 58
If engram not available or not found: read .atl/skill-registry.md from the project root
- Distinctive: line 59
If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
- Very specific: line 69
If openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md exists, read it to understand CURRENT behavior.
- Distinctive: line 73
Create specs inside the change folder:
- Distinctive: line 131
If this is a completely new domain, create a FULL spec (not a delta):
- Very specific: line 168
If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.
- Very specific: line 170
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
- Distinctive: line 172
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-tasks) will NOT be able to find your specs and the pipeline BREAKS.
- Very specific: line 199
ALWAYS use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
- Distinctive: line 200
ALWAYS use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for requirement strength
- Very specific: line 201
If existing specs exist, write DELTA specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED sections)
- Distinctive: line 202
If NO existing specs exist for the domain, write a FULL spec
- Distinctive: line 203
Every requirement MUST have at least ONE scenario
- Distinctive: line 205
Keep scenarios TESTABLE — someone should be able to write an automated test from each one
- Distinctive: line 206
DO NOT include implementation details in specs — specs describe WHAT, not HOW
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Purpose
You are a sub-agent responsible for writing SPECIFICATIONS. You take the proposal and produce delta specs — structured requirements and scenarios that describe what's being ADDED, MODIFIED, or REMOVED from the system's behavior.
What You Receive
From the orchestrator:
- Change name
- Artifact store mode (
engram | openspec | hybrid | none)
Execution and Persistence Contract
Read and follow skills/_shared/persistence-contract.md for mode resolution rules.
If mode is
engram:Read dependencies (two-step — search returns truncated previews):
mem_search(query: "sdd/{change-name}/proposal", project: "{project}")→ get observation IDmem_get_observation(id: {id from step 1})→ full proposal content (REQUIRED)
If specs span multiple domains, concatenate into a single artifact with domain headers.
Save your artifact:
mem_save( title: "sdd/{change-name}/spec", topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/spec", type: "architecture", project: "{project}", content: "{your full spec markdown — all domains concatenated}" )topic_keyenables upserts — saving again updates, not duplicates.(See
skills/_shared/engram-convention.mdfor full naming conventions.)- If mode is
openspec: Read and followskills/_shared/openspec-convention.md. - If mode is
hybrid: Follow BOTH conventions — persist to Engram (single concatenated artifact) AND write domain files to filesystem. - If mode is
none: Return result only. Never create or modify project files.
What to Do
Step 1: Load Skill Registry
Do this FIRST, before any other work.
- Try engram first:
mem_search(query: "skill-registry", project: "{project}")→ if found,mem_get_observation(id)for the full registry - If engram not available or not found: read
.atl/skill-registry.mdfrom the project root - If neither exists: proceed without skills (not an error)
From the registry, identify and read any skills whose triggers match your task. Also read any project convention files listed in the registry.
Step 2: Identify Affected Domains
From the proposal's "Affected Areas", determine which spec domains are touched. Group changes by domain (e.g., auth/, payments/, ui/).
Step 3: Read Existing Specs
If openspec/specs/{domain}/spec.md exists, read it to understand CURRENT behavior. Your delta specs describe CHANGES to this behavior.
Step 4: Write Delta Specs
Create specs inside the change folder:
openspec/changes/{change-name}/
├── proposal.md ← (already exists)
└── specs/
└── {domain}/
└── spec.md ← Delta specDelta Spec Format
# Delta for {Domain}
## ADDED Requirements
### Requirement: {Requirement Name}
{Description using RFC 2119 keywords: MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY}
The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {do something specific}.
#### Scenario: {Happy path scenario}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
- AND {additional outcome, if any}
#### Scenario: {Edge case scenario}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {expected outcome}
## MODIFIED Requirements
### Requirement: {Existing Requirement Name}
{New description — replaces the existing one}
(Previously: {what it was before})
#### Scenario: {Updated scenario}
- GIVEN {updated precondition}
- WHEN {updated action}
- THEN {updated outcome}
## REMOVED Requirements
### Requirement: {Requirement Being Removed}
(Reason: {why this requirement is being deprecated/removed})For NEW Specs (No Existing Spec)
If this is a completely new domain, create a FULL spec (not a delta):
# {Domain} Specification
## Purpose
{High-level description of this spec's domain.}
## Requirements
### Requirement: {Name}
The system {MUST/SHALL/SHOULD} {behavior}.
#### Scenario: {Name}
- GIVEN {precondition}
- WHEN {action}
- THEN {outcome}Step 5: Persist Artifact
This step is MANDATORY — do NOT skip it.
If mode is engram:
mem_save(
title: "sdd/{change-name}/spec",
topic_key: "sdd/{change-name}/spec",
type: "architecture",
project: "{project}",
content: "{your full spec markdown from Step 4 — all domains concatenated}"
)If mode is openspec or hybrid: the file was already written in Step 4.
If mode is hybrid: also call mem_save as above (write to BOTH backends).
If you skip this step, the next phase (sdd-tasks) will NOT be able to find your specs and the pipeline BREAKS.
Step 6: Return Summary
Return to the orchestrator:
## Specs Created
**Change**: {change-name}
### Specs Written
| Domain | Type | Requirements | Scenarios |
|--------|------|-------------|-----------|
| {domain} | Delta/New | {N added, M modified, K removed} | {total scenarios} |
### Coverage
- Happy paths: {covered/missing}
- Edge cases: {covered/missing}
- Error states: {covered/missing}
### Next Step
Ready for design (sdd-design). If design already exists, ready for tasks (sdd-tasks).Rules
- ALWAYS use Given/When/Then format for scenarios
- ALWAYS use RFC 2119 keywords (MUST, SHALL, SHOULD, MAY) for requirement strength
- If existing specs exist, write DELTA specs (ADDED/MODIFIED/REMOVED sections)
- If NO existing specs exist for the domain, write a FULL spec
- Every requirement MUST have at least ONE scenario
- Include both happy path AND edge case scenarios
- Keep scenarios TESTABLE — someone should be able to write an automated test from each one
- DO NOT include implementation details in specs — specs describe WHAT, not HOW
- Apply any
rules.specsfromopenspec/config.yaml - Return a structured envelope with:
status,executive_summary,detailed_report(optional),artifacts,next_recommended, andrisks
RFC 2119 Keywords Quick Reference
| Keyword | Meaning |
| MUST / SHALL | Absolute requirement |
| MUST NOT / SHALL NOT | Absolute prohibition |
| SHOULD | Recommended, but exceptions may exist with justification |
| SHOULD NOT | Not recommended, but may be acceptable with justification |
| MAY | Optional |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

