agentleFS
Liberty91LTDLiberty91LTD/cti-skills/CLAUDE.md

cti-skills

CLAUDE.md35 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub

Cyber Threat Intelligence skills pack for Claude Code and other agentic IDEs. See AGENTS.md for the platform-neutral orientation — this file adds Claude-Code-specific notes. Opt-in. Skills with metadata.tradecraft: true in frontmatter produce outputs marked with TLP, Admiralty source ratings, MISP confidence, and probability yardstick language. The orchestrator auto-applies these to finished products. See /apply-tlp, /score-source, /confidence-language, /likelihood-language. One default, since 2.0: /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments prefer graded evidence and run /quality-of-information-check first. The user can skip it; the output is…

The file

We split this CLAUDE.md into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Direct skill invocations: when the user types /ach, /iran-cyber-espionage, /pir-management etc., invoke the named skill directly, bypassing …

    line 21
  2. Very specific:

    If it prints errors, fix them.

    line 38

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 26,980 CLAUDE.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
CLAUDE.md

cti-skills — Claude Code orientation

Cyber Threat Intelligence skills pack for Claude Code and other agentic IDEs. See AGENTS.md for the platform-neutral orientation — this file adds Claude-Code-specific notes.

What's here

  • skills/ — 78 composable CTI skills flat at the repo root per Agent Skills spec. Each is a directory with a SKILL.md. Canonical user-invokable interface. Works in any Agent-Skills-compatible IDE.
  • .claude-plugin/marketplace.json — plugin manifest, install via /plugin marketplace add Liberty91LTD/cti-skills.
  • .claude/agents/ — optional Claude-Code-specific subagents (analyst, report-writer, quality-reviewer, osint-researcher, ioc-processor, detection-engineer). These wrap skills with model routing (Opus for deep reasoning, Sonnet for structured work) and tool permissions. The new cti-orchestrator lives as a skill now — the old agent was archived.
  • .claude/settings.json — baseline permissions.
  • tools/ — REGISTRY + per-API integration guides + zero-dep CLIs. Used by lookup-* skills.
  • archive/agents/ — the 7 tool-API agents and old cti-orchestrator — moved here after being superseded by lookup-* skills and the orchestrator skill.
  • data/ — sample IOCs, reports, PIRs for users to model after.
  • mitre-attack/ — bundled MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise dataset.
  • VERSIONS.md — per-skill semver + changelog.
  • validate-skills.sh — run before committing.

How to use the pack

  1. Orchestrator-routed requests (the default): the user says "investigate 8.8.8.8" or "profile APT28" — route to /cti-orchestrator, which picks the right investigation/analysis skill and auto-applies rigor skills (TLP, source rating, confidence, likelihood) on the output.
  2. Direct skill invocations: when the user types /ach, /iran-cyber-espionage, /pir-management etc., invoke the named skill directly, bypassing the orchestrator.
  3. Composition: skills can invoke other skills. Investigation skills chain lookups; analytical skills can prioritize IOCs and dispatch further investigation. Composition is documented at the top of each skill body.
  4. Claude-Code subagent specialists (optional): for deep analytical work, Claude Code can dispatch to analyst (Opus), report-writer (Opus), quality-reviewer (Opus), osint-researcher (Sonnet), ioc-processor (Sonnet), or detection-engineer (Sonnet). These agents load the same skills but offer model routing and tighter tool permissions. They are a Claude-Code-only optimization — skills alone work everywhere.

Tradecraft vocabularies

Opt-in. Skills with metadata.tradecraft: true in frontmatter produce outputs marked with TLP, Admiralty source ratings, MISP confidence, and probability yardstick language. The orchestrator auto-applies these to finished products. See /apply-tlp, /score-source, /confidence-language, /likelihood-language.

One default, since 2.0: /ach, /threat-assessment and /writing-assessments prefer graded evidence and run /quality-of-information-check first. The user can skip it; the output is then labelled ungraded and capped at Moderate confidence. Provenance is resolved by skills/source-provenance/scripts/resolve_provenance.py or the Liberty91 platform, never reconstructed from memory. skills/source-provenance/references/source-types.md classifies sources and must never carry reliability ratings. Claims are graded in words on two elements, access level and claim support (see skills/quality-of-information-check/references/grading-rubric.md). That grade is not the Admiralty scale and is never written or exported as a letter and a number.

Before committing

./validate-skills.sh
python3 tests/provenance/run_tests.py

If it prints errors, fix them. If it warns about skill body size, move detail into references/ subdirectories. Update VERSIONS.md when you ship changes.

API keys

Stored in .claude/settings.local.json (gitignored), set via ./scripts/setup.sh, or passed as environment variables. See README.md.

See also

  • README.md — install, quick start, skill catalog
  • AGENTS.md — platform-neutral orientation
  • CONTRIBUTING.md — how to propose changes
  • VERSIONS.md — changelog

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.