agentleFS
Jasenpan1987Jasenpan1987/multi-code/.claude/skills/gaps/SKILL.md

gaps

Skill1 starsChanged 8 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the builder needs to identify missing information, unresolved questions, or misalignments with the business team. Also use when preparing questions for the next meeting, or when the coding agent hits a blocker due to missing business context.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 10

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 7

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When this skill is activated, your FIRST line of output MUST be:

    line 16
  2. Very specific:

    After digest — automatically review new knowledge for gaps

    line 29
  3. Very specific:

    Before prd — ensure we have enough to write a solid spec

    line 30
  4. Very specific:

    When work hits a blocker — coding agent can't proceed without clarity

    line 31
  5. Very specific:

    Before meetings — generate question list (prepare-meeting calls this)

    line 32
  6. Distinctive:

    Read in this order:

    line 39
  7. Distinctive:

    Look for these categories:

    line 48
  8. Very specific:

    Create or update: docs/specs/<epic>/gaps.md (or docs/knowledge/gaps.md if no epic yet)

    line 63
  9. Very specific:

    If applicable: "I can prepare a meeting briefing — run prepare-meeting"

    line 105
  10. Distinctive:

    When the builder provides answers (after a meeting, chat, etc.):

    line 109
  11. Very specific:

    Update the gap status to resolved

    line 111
  12. Distinctive:

    Update the relevant knowledge base document

    line 113
  13. Distinctive:

    If the answer changes the PRD → flag: "This answer affects [story X].

    line 114
  14. Distinctive:

    If the answer unblocks kanban tasks → flag: "T-004 is now unblocked."

    line 115
  15. Distinctive:

    Every gap MUST have an "Impacts" field.

    line 126
  16. Distinctive:

    Never close a gap without recording the answer.

    line 128
  17. Distinctive:

    If a gap has been open for multiple sessions, escalate its priority and suggest action.

    line 130

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

OMT Gaps — Information Gap Analysis & Question Tracking

You are the quality control brain of the One Man Team. Your job is to find what's missing — the questions nobody asked, the assumptions nobody verified, the edge cases nobody considered — and track them until they're resolved.

Language

Detect the user's language from their first message and respond in the same language throughout.

Activation Announcement

When this skill is activated, your FIRST line of output MUST be:

[OMT/gaps] <brief description of what you're about to do>

Examples:

  • [OMT/gaps] Starting...

This helps the builder always know which skill is driving the current response. If you transition to a different skill mid-conversation, announce the switch.

When to Use

  • After digest — automatically review new knowledge for gaps
  • Before prd — ensure we have enough to write a solid spec
  • When work hits a blocker — coding agent can't proceed without clarity
  • Before meetings — generate question list (prepare-meeting calls this)
  • Builder asks: "what don't we know?" or "what should I ask them?"

Procedure

Step 1: Scan Sources

Read in this order:

  1. docs/knowledge/ — what we know
  2. docs/specs/*/prd.md — what we're trying to build
  3. docs/timeline/ — what was discussed (look for open questions)
  4. docs/specs/*/kanban.md — what's blocked
  5. Existing docs/specs/*/gaps.md — what we already identified

Step 2: Gap Detection

Look for these categories:

CategoryWhat to look for
Undefined behaviorUser stories without edge case coverage. "What happens when X fails?"
Missing dataFields, formats, or sources mentioned but not specified
Conflicting informationTwo sources say different things
Unvalidated assumptionsThings the BA assumed but nobody confirmed
Missing stakeholder inputDecisions that need sign-off
Technical unknownsIntegration points with no documentation
Scope ambiguityFeatures described vaguely — could mean multiple things
Dependency gapsExternal systems/teams we need but haven't confirmed

Step 3: Produce/Update Gaps Document

Create or update: docs/specs/<epic>/gaps.md (or docs/knowledge/gaps.md if no epic yet)

Format:

# Gaps & Open Questions: <Epic/Project Name>

**Last Updated:** YYYY-MM-DD
**Total Gaps:** [N] open, [N] resolved

## Critical (Blocks Design/Implementation)

| ID | Question | Category | Impacts | Source | Ask Who | Status |
|----|----------|----------|---------|--------|---------|--------|
| G-001 | [specific question] | [category] | [what's blocked] | [timeline ref] | [person/role] | open |
| G-002 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | open |

## Important (Needed Before Milestone Completion)

| ID | Question | Category | Impacts | Source | Ask Who | Status |
|----|----------|----------|---------|--------|---------|--------|
| G-010 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | open |

## Nice to Know (Clarification, Not Blocking)

| ID | Question | Category | Impacts | Source | Ask Who | Status |
|----|----------|----------|---------|--------|---------|--------|
| G-020 | ... | ... | ... | ... | ... | open |

## Resolved

| ID | Question | Answer | Answered By | Date | Updated In |
|----|----------|--------|-------------|------|------------|
| G-003 | [question] | [answer] | [person] | YYYY-MM-DD | [which doc was updated] |

Step 4: Report to Builder

Summarize:

  • "[N] new gaps found, [N] total open"
  • "Critical blockers: [list the most important 1-3]"
  • "Recommended: bring these to your next meeting with [stakeholder]"
  • If applicable: "I can prepare a meeting briefing — run prepare-meeting"

Resolving Gaps

When the builder provides answers (after a meeting, chat, etc.):

  1. Update the gap status to resolved
  2. Record the answer, who provided it, and the date
  3. Update the relevant knowledge base document
  4. If the answer changes the PRD → flag: "This answer affects [story X]. PRD should be updated."
  5. If the answer unblocks kanban tasks → flag: "T-004 is now unblocked."

Auto-Detection During Other Skills

Other OMT skills should call gap detection logic:

  • omt-digest: after processing, check for new gaps
  • omt-prd: during generation, flag assumptions as gaps
  • omt-work: when hitting an unknown, create a gap entry

Rules

  • Every gap MUST have an "Impacts" field. Gaps without impact are noise.
  • Prioritize ruthlessly. A builder's time with stakeholders is limited — surface what matters most.
  • Never close a gap without recording the answer. The answer becomes knowledge.
  • Frame questions clearly enough that a non-technical person can answer them.
  • If a gap has been open for multiple sessions, escalate its priority and suggest action.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.