domain-engineering
Skill4 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub
Проверка общих модулей и проектов с неопределенным стеком по их контрактам.
In this repository21 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- clean-implementationSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- core-analysisSkill
- core-debuggingSkill
- core-documentationSkill
- core-planningSkill
- core-securitySkill
- delivery-pipelineSkill
- domain-backendSkill
- domain-frontendSkill
- domain-mobileSkill
- flowcairn-controlSkill
- implementation-lessonSkill
- project-contextSkill
- testingSkill
- workflow-diagnosisSkill
- workflow-planningSkill
- workflow-reuseSkill
- workflow-test-qualitySkill
- workflow-verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 10
Check должен действительно проверять нужное свойство.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Общие инженерные требования
- Следуй фактическому языку, контрактам и инструментарию модуля. Не определяй домен по имени папки и не добавляй отдельный framework без необходимости.
- Свяжи существенное требование с входами, выходами, ошибками и известными потребителями. Выбирай глубину проверки по реальному риску.
- Check должен действительно проверять нужное свойство; source-review годится для непосредственно наблюдаемого исходника. Отсутствующий или неподходящий verifier не дает pass: обозначь пробел и human acceptance.
- Для общего модуля учти затронутых потребителей и актуальность их evidence после изменения. Не распространяй правила одного интерфейса или платформы на весь проект.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.