agentleFS
HainrixzHainrixz/claude-db/skills/db-query-patterns/SKILL.md

db-query-patterns

Skill22 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Audit query-shape anti-patterns — SELECT *, structural N+1 (directional), OFFSET pagination vs keyset, and non-SARGable predicates that defeat indexes. Module M13. Feeds the Performance & Scale score.

The file

Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) · tododeia.com · id er-f37b7121 -->

db-query-patterns (M13)

How queries are written decides whether the indexes from M11 can even be used. This module inspects query shape in ORM source and raw SQL. Feeds the Performance & Scale score (axis performance, relational Query w18, shared with M3/M19).

What it checks

  1. SELECT * — fetching all columns defeats covering indexes, bloats network/cache, and couples code to column order. Flag in hot paths.
  2. Structural N+1 — a query inside a loop / per-row lazy relation load that should be a single join or batched IN. Static detection is directional (the loop's runtime cardinality is unknown) — it points at the structure, never claims a row count.
  3. OFFSET pagination — LIMIT n OFFSET m degrades linearly with depth; deep pagination should use keyset/seek (WHERE id > $last ORDER BY id LIMIT n).
  4. Non-SARGable predicates — wrapping the indexed column in a function (WHERE lower(email)=…, WHERE date(created_at)=…, leading-wildcard LIKE '%x', implicit type cast) so the index can't be used. Recommend an expression index or rewriting the predicate. For the leading-wildcard / LIKE '%x%' case a B-tree can never help — name the remedy: a pg_trgm GIN/GiST index on the column (or a dedicated search engine for heavy full-text search).

Score / axis

Feeds performance only (relational Query w18; Query category in document/time-series/graph profiles).

Tier-0 (static)

Grep ORM call sites and raw SQL for SELECT *, function-wrapped indexed columns, leading-wildcard LIKE, and OFFSET; detect query calls inside loops/.map/per-item relation access for N+1. All query-pattern findings are at most directional from source — confirming the actual plan/cost needs runtime (needs_api / Tier-2).

Tier-1/2 (verification query)

EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) <the suspect query>;

Method explain_plan. A Seq Scan where an index exists confirms a non-SARGable predicate; the actual rows × loops confirms an N+1 amplification. Tier-2 pg_stat_statements (ordered by total_exec_time) surfaces the real hot queries — without it, hotness is directional.

Findings

Emit findings per schema/finding.schema.json. Examples:

  • M13.orders.select_star_hot_path — SELECT * in a frequent read (severity:2, warn, axis performance, confidence directional, fixable: proposed).
  • M13.users.n_plus_one_posts — per-row relation load in a loop (severity:3, warn, directional, fixable: advisory — requires app-side eager load / batching).
  • M13.feed.offset_deep_pagination — OFFSET deep paging (severity:2, warn, directional, fixable: proposed — keyset rewrite).
  • M13.users.non_sargable_lower_email — function-wrapped indexed column (severity:3, warn, directional, fixable: proposed — expression index or predicate rewrite).

Each finding: evidence.observed quotes the query / call site verbatim (secrets redacted); verification.reproduce is the EXPLAIN above referencing $DATABASE_URL, or a grep for the pattern; expected_impact is banded + confidence-tagged (no naked %).

Honesty

  • N+1 is directional by design: a loop running twice is fine, the same loop over 10k rows is not — static analysis cannot tell which, so it never caps and never quotes a multiplier.
  • SELECT * is harmless on a small lookup or a one-shot admin query — scope severity to hot paths.
  • Rewrites that change result semantics (keyset, predicate restructure) are proposed/advisory, never auto; expression-index additions can be proposed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.