db-naming
Skill22 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Audit naming conventions — inconsistent table/column casing and pluralization, ambiguous or reserved-word identifiers, untyped/opaque columns, inconsistent FK and boolean naming, and identifiers that fight the engine's case-folding rules. Module M7. Feeds the Design & Integrity score (Naming category, low weight).
In this repository36 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- auditSkill
- checklistSkill
- db-antipatternsSkill
- db-concurrencySkill
- db-connection-poolingSkill
- db-constraintsSkill
- db-defaults-generatedSkill
- db-engine-selectionSkill
- db-index-hygieneSkill
- db-indexingSkill
- db-keysSkill
- db-migration-safetySkill
- db-multitenancySkill
- db-normalizationSkill
- db-orchestratorSkill
- db-partitioning-shardingSkill
- db-platform-fitSkill
- db-query-patternsSkill
- db-referential-integritySkill
- db-replicas-viewsSkill
- db-security-accessSkill
- db-specialized-fitSkill
- db-storage-bloatSkill
- db-temporal-historySkill
- db-types-precisionSkill
- designSkill
- explainSkill
- fixSkill
- introspectSkill
- migrateSkill
- nextSkill
- scoreSkill
- seedSkill
- stack-detectSkill
- startSkill
The file
Files
<!-- Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) · tododeia.com · id er-f37b7121 -->db-naming (M7)
Naming is the schema's documentation: consistent, predictable identifiers make joins obvious and reduce the quoting/casing bugs that creep in across ORMs and engines. It is low-weight (Naming category, design axis) — real but never the headline. This module is design-axis and never caps.
What it checks
- Casing / pluralization consistency: a mix of
snake_caseandcamelCase, or singular and plural table names (user,orders,OrderItem) in one schema — pick one and hold it. - Reserved words & case-folding traps: identifiers that are SQL reserved words (
user,order,group,select) or that rely on case ("User"quoted) — Postgres folds unquoted to lowercase, MySQL is filesystem/case-config dependent; mixed quoting causes "relation does not exist" bugs. - FK naming: FK columns not following a predictable
<referenced>_idpattern, so joins aren't self-evident. - Boolean naming: booleans not prefixed
is_/has_/can_, or negative names (not_active) that invert logic. - Opaque / ambiguous names:
data,info,value,flag,temp,col1, abbreviations without a glossary, or timestamps not suffixed_at.
Axis & severity
- Axis: design; magnitude almost always low, banded honestly.
- Reserved-word unquoted identifier that breaks across engines: severity 2–3,
warn. - Schema-wide casing/pluralization inconsistency: severity 2,
warn,fixable: proposed(rename is high-blast-radius — neverauto). - Opaque column name / missing
_atsuffix: severity 1,warn. - M7 never caps any score; it is the smallest-weight design category.
Tier-0 static check
Parse DDL/snapshot via scripts/parse-schema.mjs: tally identifier casing styles and table pluralization; match identifiers against a reserved-word list per engine; check FK columns against the <table>_id pattern; flag boolean columns without is_/has_/can_ and opaque names. This is fully static and directional.
Tier-1 verification query
Confirm live identifier inventory and quoting:
-- $DATABASE_URL, read-only
SELECT table_name, column_name FROM information_schema.columns
WHERE table_schema NOT IN ('pg_catalog','information_schema')
ORDER BY table_name; -- inspect casing/plurality/reserved words across the real catalogFindings
Emit per schema/finding.schema.json. Examples:
M7.schema.mixed_casing— schema mixessnake_caseandcamelCaseidentifiers (severity 2,warn, axisdesign,fixable: proposed).M7.user.reserved_word_table— table nameduserrequires quoting and breaks unquoted refs (severity 2,warn, axisdesign).M7.accounts.active_boolean_unprefixed— booleanactivenot namedis_active(severity 1,warn). Each finding:evidence.observedquotes the identifier(s) verbatim;verification.reproduceis the runnable query above (method: ddl_parse/schema_introspect);expected_impactis banded (typicallylow) + confidencedirectionalwith rationale.
Honesty
- Naming findings are advisory polish — never let them dominate the report or imply a functional defect.
- Renames are destructive and break app code/migrations; recommendations are
proposed/advisory, neverauto. - Reserved-word and case-folding behaviour is engine-specific; scope each finding to the detected engine rather than asserting a universal rule.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

