agentleFS
HainrixzHainrixz/claude-db/skills/db-orchestrator/SKILL.md

db-orchestrator

Skill22 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub

Orchestrates a full database audit — detects the stack(s), dispatches read-only auditor subagents in parallel by paradigm, merges and dedupes their findings, computes the two never-blended scores (Design & Integrity + Performance & Scale) via score.mjs, and renders the report. Invoked by the audit command; not usually called directly.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Run stack-detect (wraps scripts/detect-stack.mjs).

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    If the user opted into Tier-1, run introspect (read-only) so runtime-dependent checks can reach established.

    line 16
  3. Very specific:

    Merge: all findings; dedupe by id (keep the most severe status: fail > warn > needs_api > pass > not_applicable).

    line 29
  4. Distinctive:

    Keep this skill's own output tight — the value is the merged report, not narration.

    line 46

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- Copyright (c) 2026 Enrique Rocha (@soyenriquerocha) · tododeia.com · id er-f37b7121 -->

db-orchestrator (Layer 2)

Coordinates the whole audit. Three phases: detect → dispatch → synthesize. Two scores, never blended.

1. Detect

  1. Resolve the target (project dir, or a plain-language description).
  2. Run stack-detect (wraps scripts/detect-stack.mjs). Get the stacks array, each with paradigm, engine, orm, platform, source_of_truth, confidence.
  3. Empty result → route to /claude-db:start (wizard) or description mode. Never guess an engine.
  4. If the user opted into Tier-1, run introspect (read-only) so runtime-dependent checks can reach established; otherwise those checks will return needs_api.

2. Dispatch (parallel, read-only)

For each stack, spawn the read-only auditor subagents in parallel — one message with multiple Task calls — so their verbose intermediate output stays isolated. (context: fork is NOT a Task parameter; parallelism is achieved by issuing several Task calls in a single message.) Pass each the source_of_truth location/contents, the paradigm, the engine/platform, and its assigned modules. Auditors of an inactive paradigm are not dispatched (their modules emit no findings and leave the denominator):

  • schema-integrity-auditor → M1–M10 (modeling, keys, referential integrity, types, constraints, defaults, naming, temporal, multitenancy, security/RLS). Always (relational); for NoSQL it runs the paradigm-shaped subset.
  • performance-scale-auditor → M11–M18 (indexing, hygiene, query patterns, concurrency, pooling, partitioning, replicas/views, storage/bloat). Always.
  • nosql-paradigm-auditor → M19 (NoSQL anti-patterns) + access-pattern fit. Only for document / key-value / wide-column.
  • specialized-platform-auditor → M20 (vector/time-series/graph/search), M21 (platform fit), M0 (engine-selection recommendation in design mode). For vector/TS/graph/search and all platform checks.
  • migration-safety-auditor → M22 (migration lint). When migration files are in scope (/claude-db:migrate, or audit when a migration dir exists).

Each subagent returns a JSON array of findings conforming to schema/finding.schema.json. Auditors are read-only (tools Read, Grep, Glob, Bash, WebFetch only) — the audit can never mutate files. M19/M20 findings keep their module id for provenance but inherit the natural module's category at scoring time.

3. Synthesize

  1. Merge all findings; dedupe by id (keep the most severe status: fail > warn > needs_api > pass > not_applicable).
  2. Score per stack with the matching paradigm:
    node scripts/score.mjs --findings <merged.json> --paradigm <paradigm>
    Multi-store → score each stack, then roll up worst-of-across-stores per axis (design = min over stores, same for performance); name the flooring store (e.g. "Design 58 — floored by redis-cache").
  3. Render the report (bands/interpretations from references/scoring-model.md):
    • Header: Design & Integrity band/score + Performance & Scale band/score, each with the one-line interpretation from score.mjs. If a score is capped:true, show both value and uncapped computed and name the sev-5 fail that capped it.
    • Per-axis category table (one per score): category, weight, value, active?. Inactive categories shown as such (re-normalized out of the denominator).
    • Confidence line: tier reached (0/1/2) + total needs_api count across both axes. Never present a needs_api check as a pass.
    • Prioritized actions: findings sorted by severity × magnitude ÷ effort (magnitude banded high|medium|low, never a fabricated %). Each: status, severity, evidence.observed (real DDL/query, secrets redacted), verification.reproduce, recommendation, fixability (auto/proposed/advisory), and expected_impact (axis + confidence + magnitude).
    • Footer: "Run /claude-db:fix to apply the safe, reversible migrations — you confirm each change."

Plain-language layer (novice-friendly)

Alongside the technical report, give a short plain-language summary: what the two scores mean in one sentence each ("your design is solid but it won't hold load yet"), the top 3 things to fix first in non-jargon terms, and what needs_api means ("I'd need a read-only connection to confirm these"). Keep the expert detail; add the human translation — never replace one with the other.

Notes

  • Keep this skill's own output tight — the value is the merged report, not narration.
  • Honesty: never fabricate stats/latency/throughput/row-counts/prices. needs_api when a live DB is required. Read-only by default; speculative findings never cap.
  • Respond in the user's language (EN/ES).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.