ai-solution-two-laws
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub
用两条铁律和一句提问，判断一个 AI 方案 / 供应商 / 自研路线的**能力天花板**，并预测 AI 会在哪个业务环节先爆发。 何时调用：用户在比较几家 AI 供应商或几条技术路线；在问"这个方案靠不靠谱""效果能不能持续变好""要不要买这个行业知识库/规则引擎"； 在犹豫"自研还是采购""上规则引擎还是上模型"；在问"AI 会先在我们哪个环节落地/爆发"； 或已经上线一段时间、效果曲线趋平，怀疑是不是路线本身有上限。 关键语言信号："这个 AI 方案值不值""供应商说他们沉淀了多年行业专家知识""要不要自己训一个""效果三个月后就不涨了""AI 在我们这行会先做什么""我们的数据能不能形成壁垒"。 不适用于：判断整个行业会不会被颠覆、要不要现在动手（用 tech-shock-four-crushes）；判断手里工具是第几级、要不要按智能体价格买（用 agent-level-ladder）；诊断已上线工具为什么"看起来聪明却不好使"（用 agent-four-components）；以及模型微调、提示词工程等实施层的技术细节。
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-four-componentsSkill
- agent-level-ladderSkill
- ai-decision-coreSkill
- boss-ai-enginesSkill
- commitment-ledgerSkill
- data-flywheelSkill
- dri-identify-empowerSkill
- earnings-call-testSkill
- four-faces-of-judgmentSkill
- headcount-to-computeSkill
- living-ontologySkill
- ruler-before-rankingSkill
- sediment-before-flattenSkill
- ai-future-is-nowSkill
- tech-shock-four-crushesSkill
- token-cheap-system-valuableSkill
- transformation-failure-diagnosisSkill
- work-quadrant-compassSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.