brainstorming
Skill2 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.
190 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- alunadev/ald-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkilladdskill
Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ryanportfolioSkillapply-firmware
Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +6 more from ryanportfolio
Other versions190 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- Fandry96/k3-agentic-skills★ 2798% same
- xfstudio/skills★ 996% same
Wrote their own version · 188
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- vudovn/ag-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- vudovn/antigravity-kit★ 8.2ksame name
- JetBrains/thinkrail★ 7.9ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 4.9ksame name
- BetterTyped/react-zoom-pan-pinch★ 1.9ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository191 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/postgres-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-compliance-accessibility-auditSkill
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeSkill
- advanced-evaluationSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- alexSkill
- ariaSkill
- depSkill
- lunaSkill
- masonSkill
- maxSkill
- quinnSkill
- rexSkill
- agent-squadSkill
- ai-agent-developmentSkill
- ai-agents-architectSkill
- ai-engineering-toolkitSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-documentation-generatorSkill
- api-documentationSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- api-endpoint-builderSkill
- api-fuzzing-bug-bountySkill
- api-patternsSkill
- api-security-testingSkill
- api-testing-observability-api-mockSkill
- application-performance-performance-optimizationSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- async-python-patternsSkill
- attack-tree-constructionSkill
- autonomous-agent-patternsSkill
- aws-cost-optimizerSkill
- aws-serverlessSkill
- awt-e2e-testingSkill
- azure-functionsSkill
- backend-architectSkill
- backend-dev-guidelinesSkill
- backend-security-coderSkill
- breakdown-feature-implementationSkill
- breakdown-feature-prdSkill
- broken-authenticationSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- cloud-devopsSkill
- cloudformation-best-practicesSkill
- code-refactoring-refactor-cleanSkill
- code-refactoring-tech-debtSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- comprehensive-review-full-reviewSkill
- comprehensive-review-pr-enhanceSkill
- container-security-hardeningSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
19 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.
18
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 40
Before asking any questions:
- Distinctive: line 60
Ask one question per message
- Distinctive: line 61
Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible
- Distinctive: line 62
Use open-ended questions only when necessary
- Distinctive: line 63
If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions
- Distinctive: line 85
If the user is unsure:
- Distinctive: line 94
Before proposing any design, you MUST pause and do the following:
- Distinctive: line 130
Avoid premature optimization (YAGNI ruthlessly)
- Distinctive: line 138
When presenting the design:
- Distinctive: line 141
After each section, ask:
- Distinctive: line 175
Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 188
Only after documentation is complete, ask:
- Distinctive: line 193
Create an explicit implementation plan
- Distinctive: line 209
If any criterion is unmet:
- Distinctive: line 221
Prefer clarity over cleverness
- Very specific: line 226
If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the …
- Distinctive: line 232
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Distinctive: line 233
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Distinctive: line 234
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
Purpose
Turn raw ideas into clear, validated designs and specifications through structured dialogue before any implementation begins.
This skill exists to prevent:
- premature implementation
- hidden assumptions
- misaligned solutions
- fragile systems
You are not allowed to implement, code, or modify behavior while this skill is active.
Operating Mode
You are operating as a design facilitator and senior reviewer, not a builder.
- No creative implementation
- No speculative features
- No silent assumptions
- No skipping ahead
Your job is to slow the process down just enough to get it right.
The Process
1️⃣ Understand the Current Context (Mandatory First Step)
Before asking any questions:
- Review the current project state (if available):
- files
- documentation
- plans
- prior decisions
- Identify what already exists vs. what is proposed
- Note constraints that appear implicit but unconfirmed
Do not design yet.
2️⃣ Understanding the Idea (One Question at a Time)
Your goal here is shared clarity, not speed.
Rules:
- Ask one question per message
- Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible
- Use open-ended questions only when necessary
- If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions
Focus on understanding:
- purpose
- target users
- constraints
- success criteria
- explicit non-goals
3️⃣ Non-Functional Requirements (Mandatory)
You MUST explicitly clarify or propose assumptions for:
- Performance expectations
- Scale (users, data, traffic)
- Security or privacy constraints
- Reliability / availability needs
- Maintenance and ownership expectations
If the user is unsure:
- Propose reasonable defaults
- Clearly mark them as assumptions
4️⃣ Understanding Lock (Hard Gate)
Before proposing any design, you MUST pause and do the following:
Understanding Summary
Provide a concise summary (5–7 bullets) covering:
- What is being built
- Why it exists
- Who it is for
- Key constraints
- Explicit non-goals
Assumptions
List all assumptions explicitly.
Open Questions
List unresolved questions, if any.
Then ask:
“Does this accurately reflect your intent?
Please confirm or correct anything before we move to design.”
Do NOT proceed until explicit confirmation is given.
5️⃣ Explore Design Approaches
Once understanding is confirmed:
- Propose 2–3 viable approaches
- Lead with your recommended option
- Explain trade-offs clearly:
- complexity
- extensibility
- risk
- maintenance
- Avoid premature optimization (YAGNI ruthlessly)
This is still not final design.
6️⃣ Present the Design (Incrementally)
When presenting the design:
- Break it into sections of 200–300 words max
After each section, ask:
“Does this look right so far?”
Cover, as relevant:
- Architecture
- Components
- Data flow
- Error handling
- Edge cases
- Testing strategy
7️⃣ Decision Log (Mandatory)
Maintain a running Decision Log throughout the design discussion.
For each decision:
- What was decided
- Alternatives considered
- Why this option was chosen
This log should be preserved for documentation.
After the Design
📄 Documentation
Once the design is validated:
- Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g. Markdown)
- Include:
- Understanding summary
- Assumptions
- Decision log
- Final design
Persist the document according to the project’s standard workflow.
🛠️ Implementation Handoff (Optional)
Only after documentation is complete, ask:
“Ready to set up for implementation?”
If yes:
- Create an explicit implementation plan
- Isolate work if the workflow supports it
- Proceed incrementally
Exit Criteria (Hard Stop Conditions)
You may exit brainstorming mode only when all of the following are true:
- Understanding Lock has been confirmed
- At least one design approach is explicitly accepted
- Major assumptions are documented
- Key risks are acknowledged
- Decision Log is complete
If any criterion is unmet:
- Continue refinement
- Do NOT proceed to implementation
Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)
- One question at a time
- Assumptions must be explicit
- Explore alternatives
- Validate incrementally
- Prefer clarity over cleverness
- Be willing to go back and clarify
- YAGNI ruthlessly
If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the multi-agent-brainstorming skill before implementation.
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

