agentleFS
GhostekenGhosteken/agent-harness/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

brainstorming

Skill2 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use before creative or constructive work (features, architecture, behavior). Transforms vague ideas into validated designs through disciplined reasoning and collaboration.

190 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    addskill

    Create, import, update, or install repo or personal skills: runtime ownership, resources, discovery checks.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ryanportfolioSkill

    apply-firmware

    Bring current folder (plain folder, existing repo, old or partial firmware copy) up to full Harness Firmware in place. Mirror external repo → adopt-repo.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Leodorareluctant259
  • +6 more from ryanportfolio

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

19 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 170 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 18

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before asking any questions:

    line 40
  2. Distinctive:

    Ask one question per message

    line 60
  3. Distinctive:

    Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible

    line 61
  4. Distinctive:

    Use open-ended questions only when necessary

    line 62
  5. Distinctive:

    If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions

    line 63
  6. Distinctive:

    If the user is unsure:

    line 85
  7. Distinctive:

    Before proposing any design, you MUST pause and do the following:

    line 94
  8. Distinctive:

    Avoid premature optimization (YAGNI ruthlessly)

    line 130
  9. Distinctive:

    When presenting the design:

    line 138
  10. Distinctive:

    After each section, ask:

    line 141
  11. Distinctive:

    Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g.

    line 175
  12. Distinctive:

    Only after documentation is complete, ask:

    line 188
  13. Distinctive:

    Create an explicit implementation plan

    line 193
  14. Distinctive:

    If any criterion is unmet:

    line 209
  15. Distinctive:

    Prefer clarity over cleverness

    line 221
  16. Very specific:

    If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the …

    line 226
  17. Distinctive:

    Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.

    line 232
  18. Distinctive:

    Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.

    line 233
  19. Distinctive:

    Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

    line 234

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 170 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs

Purpose

Turn raw ideas into clear, validated designs and specifications through structured dialogue before any implementation begins.

This skill exists to prevent:

  • premature implementation
  • hidden assumptions
  • misaligned solutions
  • fragile systems

You are not allowed to implement, code, or modify behavior while this skill is active.


Operating Mode

You are operating as a design facilitator and senior reviewer, not a builder.

  • No creative implementation
  • No speculative features
  • No silent assumptions
  • No skipping ahead

Your job is to slow the process down just enough to get it right.


The Process

1️⃣ Understand the Current Context (Mandatory First Step)

Before asking any questions:

  • Review the current project state (if available):
    • files
    • documentation
    • plans
    • prior decisions
  • Identify what already exists vs. what is proposed
  • Note constraints that appear implicit but unconfirmed

Do not design yet.


2️⃣ Understanding the Idea (One Question at a Time)

Your goal here is shared clarity, not speed.

Rules:

  • Ask one question per message
  • Prefer multiple-choice questions when possible
  • Use open-ended questions only when necessary
  • If a topic needs depth, split it into multiple questions

Focus on understanding:

  • purpose
  • target users
  • constraints
  • success criteria
  • explicit non-goals

3️⃣ Non-Functional Requirements (Mandatory)

You MUST explicitly clarify or propose assumptions for:

  • Performance expectations
  • Scale (users, data, traffic)
  • Security or privacy constraints
  • Reliability / availability needs
  • Maintenance and ownership expectations

If the user is unsure:

  • Propose reasonable defaults
  • Clearly mark them as assumptions

4️⃣ Understanding Lock (Hard Gate)

Before proposing any design, you MUST pause and do the following:

Understanding Summary

Provide a concise summary (5–7 bullets) covering:

  • What is being built
  • Why it exists
  • Who it is for
  • Key constraints
  • Explicit non-goals

Assumptions

List all assumptions explicitly.

Open Questions

List unresolved questions, if any.

Then ask:

“Does this accurately reflect your intent?
Please confirm or correct anything before we move to design.”

Do NOT proceed until explicit confirmation is given.


5️⃣ Explore Design Approaches

Once understanding is confirmed:

  • Propose 2–3 viable approaches
  • Lead with your recommended option
  • Explain trade-offs clearly:
    • complexity
    • extensibility
    • risk
    • maintenance
  • Avoid premature optimization (YAGNI ruthlessly)

This is still not final design.


6️⃣ Present the Design (Incrementally)

When presenting the design:

  • Break it into sections of 200–300 words max
  • After each section, ask:

    “Does this look right so far?”

Cover, as relevant:

  • Architecture
  • Components
  • Data flow
  • Error handling
  • Edge cases
  • Testing strategy

7️⃣ Decision Log (Mandatory)

Maintain a running Decision Log throughout the design discussion.

For each decision:

  • What was decided
  • Alternatives considered
  • Why this option was chosen

This log should be preserved for documentation.


After the Design

📄 Documentation

Once the design is validated:

  • Write the final design to a durable, shared format (e.g. Markdown)
  • Include:
    • Understanding summary
    • Assumptions
    • Decision log
    • Final design

Persist the document according to the project’s standard workflow.


🛠️ Implementation Handoff (Optional)

Only after documentation is complete, ask:

“Ready to set up for implementation?”

If yes:

  • Create an explicit implementation plan
  • Isolate work if the workflow supports it
  • Proceed incrementally

Exit Criteria (Hard Stop Conditions)

You may exit brainstorming mode only when all of the following are true:

  • Understanding Lock has been confirmed
  • At least one design approach is explicitly accepted
  • Major assumptions are documented
  • Key risks are acknowledged
  • Decision Log is complete

If any criterion is unmet:

  • Continue refinement
  • Do NOT proceed to implementation

Key Principles (Non-Negotiable)

  • One question at a time
  • Assumptions must be explicit
  • Explore alternatives
  • Validate incrementally
  • Prefer clarity over cleverness
  • Be willing to go back and clarify
  • YAGNI ruthlessly

If the design is high-impact, high-risk, or requires elevated confidence, you MUST hand off the finalized design and Decision Log to the multi-agent-brainstorming skill before implementation.

When to Use

This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.

Limitations

  • Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
  • Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
  • Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.