accessibility-compliance-accessibility-audit
Skill2 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct audits, identify barriers, and provide remediation guidance.
5 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vinayaksaxena1-maker/antigravity-disaster-recoveryedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- xfstudio/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skillsedited, first seen Apr 22, 2026
- lschGSL/claude_code_templateedited, first seen Apr 9, 2026
- ai4brands-design/claude-skillsedited, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- xfstudio/skills★ 9100% same
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 2100% same
- jornalistainclusivo/jinc-skills★ 195% same
- lschGSL/claude_code_template★ 194% same
- vinayaksaxena1-maker/antigravity-disaster-recovery★ 195% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository191 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- docs/agents.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/postgres-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- acquire-codebase-knowledgeSkill
- advanced-evaluationSkill
- agent-evaluationSkill
- alexSkill
- ariaSkill
- depSkill
- lunaSkill
- masonSkill
- maxSkill
- quinnSkill
- rexSkill
- agent-squadSkill
- ai-agent-developmentSkill
- ai-agents-architectSkill
- ai-engineering-toolkitSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-principlesSkill
- api-documentation-generatorSkill
- api-documentationSkill
- api-documenterSkill
- api-endpoint-builderSkill
- api-fuzzing-bug-bountySkill
- api-patternsSkill
- api-security-testingSkill
- api-testing-observability-api-mockSkill
- application-performance-performance-optimizationSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- architecture-patternsSkill
- async-python-patternsSkill
- attack-tree-constructionSkill
- autonomous-agent-patternsSkill
- aws-cost-optimizerSkill
- aws-serverlessSkill
- awt-e2e-testingSkill
- azure-functionsSkill
- backend-architectSkill
- backend-dev-guidelinesSkill
- backend-security-coderSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- breakdown-feature-implementationSkill
- breakdown-feature-prdSkill
- broken-authenticationSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cloud-architectSkill
- cloud-devopsSkill
- cloudformation-best-practicesSkill
- code-refactoring-refactor-cleanSkill
- code-refactoring-tech-debtSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- comprehensive-review-full-reviewSkill
- comprehensive-review-pr-enhanceSkill
- container-security-hardeningSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 1 is common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 34
Run automated scans to collect baseline violations and coverage gaps.
- Very specific: line 38
If detailed procedures are required, open resources/implementation-playbook.md.
- Distinctive: line 45
Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Distinctive: line 47
Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Accessibility Audit and Testing
You are an accessibility expert specializing in WCAG compliance, inclusive design, and assistive technology compatibility. Conduct comprehensive audits, identify barriers, provide remediation guidance, and ensure digital products are accessible to all users.
Use this skill when
- Auditing web or mobile experiences for WCAG compliance
- Identifying accessibility barriers and remediation priorities
- Establishing ongoing accessibility testing practices
- Preparing compliance evidence for stakeholders
Do not use this skill when
- You only need a general UI design review without accessibility scope
- The request is unrelated to user experience or compliance
- You cannot access the UI, design artifacts, or content
Context
The user needs to audit and improve accessibility to ensure compliance with WCAG standards and provide an inclusive experience for users with disabilities. Focus on automated testing, manual verification, remediation strategies, and establishing ongoing accessibility practices.
Requirements
$ARGUMENTS
Instructions
- Confirm scope (platforms, WCAG level, target pages, key user journeys).
- Run automated scans to collect baseline violations and coverage gaps.
- Perform manual checks (keyboard, screen reader, focus order, contrast).
- Map findings to WCAG criteria, severity, and user impact.
- Provide remediation steps and re-test after fixes.
- If detailed procedures are required, open
resources/implementation-playbook.md.
Resources
resources/implementation-playbook.mdfor detailed audit steps, tooling, and remediation examples.
Limitations
- Use this skill only when the task clearly matches the scope described above.
- Do not treat the output as a substitute for environment-specific validation, testing, or expert review.
- Stop and ask for clarification if required inputs, permissions, safety boundaries, or success criteria are missing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

