design-system
Skill1 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Establish or revise a product-specific design contract after discovery, strategy, interaction design, and design-direction selection. Use for substantial new UI, redesigns, or system changes that need a coherent visual thesis, reference synthesis, component language, motion, accessibility, responsive behavior, and required states.
192 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- caidanw/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Adelie-Squad/solosquadtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- darkweb19/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dmoreq/agent-grimoiretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ahmadvahidi/skill-atlastheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-engine, team-level and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillsetup-engine
Configure the project's game engine and version. Pins the engine in CLAUDE.md, detects knowledge gaps, and populates engine reference docs via WebSearch when the version is beyond the LLM's training data.
Also in 13 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-level
Orchestrate level design team: level-designer + narrative-director + world-builder + art-director + systems-designer + qa-tester for complete area/level creation.
Also in 12 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +2 more from CoralGame
- +6 more from lilangMax
Other versions192 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 192
- nextlevelbuilder/ui-ux-pro-max-skill★ 147ksame name
- getsentry/sentry★ 46ksame name
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- ethereum/ethereum-org-website★ 6ksame name
- langwatch/langwatch★ 5ksame name
- joye61/pic-smaller★ 2.9ksame name
- daveebbelaar/bama★ 1.7ksame name
- reatom/reatom★ 1.4ksame name
- microsoft/power-platform-skills★ 1.1ksame name
182 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- accessibility-auditSkill
- agentic-uxSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- capability-routerSkill
- codex-adapterSkill
- context-handoffSkill
- create-prdSkill
- creative-direction-sprintSkill
- decompose-prdSkill
- design-criticSkill
- design-engineering-qualitySkill
- design-intakeSkill
- design-opsSkill
- design-system-auditSkill
- design-tokensSkill
- discoverSkill
- harness-evolutionSkill
- interaction-designSkill
- loop-engineeringSkill
- parallel-planSkill
- performance-uxSkill
- polishSkill
- product-design-routerSkill
- project-onboardingSkill
- research-ledgerSkill
- responsive-auditSkill
- security-gateSkill
- self-improvement-loopSkill
- specialist-routerSkill
- strategizeSkill
- token-auditSkill
- user-needsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 175 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 10
Start from approved product intent, user needs, UX strategy, interaction model, DESIGN_BRIEF.md, and an explicitly approved direction.
- Distinctive: line 25
Avoid empty adjectives such as “clean, modern, minimal.” Make decisions specific enough that another designer or agent could distinguish …
- Very specific: line 65
Update docs/20-design/DESIGN_SYSTEM.md with the reference ledger, synthesis, visual thesis, system contract, interaction/agentic states, …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 175 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design system
Establish the direction
Start from approved product intent, user needs, UX strategy, interaction model,
DESIGN_BRIEF.md, and an explicitly approved direction. If those inputs are missing, return to
product-design-router; do not hide upstream ambiguity with styling.
Synthesize 3–7 appropriate references when the scope warrants research. Record what each reference contributes and explicitly reject wholesale copying.
Define:
- audience, product personality, visual thesis, and differentiation;
- hierarchy, information density, composition, typography, color, geometry;
- content voice, interaction principles, signature behaviors, and motion;
- responsive, accessibility, platform, and agentic-experience rules;
- required normal, edge, failure, recovery, and trust states.
Avoid empty adjectives such as “clean, modern, minimal.” Make decisions specific enough that another designer or agent could distinguish this product from a framework demo.
Resource roles
- Refero, real category-leading products, and brand material: visual research.
- UI UX Pro Max or equivalent: broad exploration and alternative generation.
- 21st.dev, Aceternity, shadcn registries: component/interaction discovery.
- Taste Skill or Impeccable: anti-slop critique and refinement.
- Emil Kowalski
emil-design-eng: high-craft implementation/refinement when installed; specialist motion, prototyping, library, and Sonner skills route only when their exact trigger is active. - Motion references: interaction inspiration when motion serves comprehension.
- Anthropic
frontend-design: optional supplementary design intelligence only. - Vercel engineering/audit skills: implementation quality, not visual identity.
The project brief and docs/20-design/DESIGN_SYSTEM.md always win.
Emil's suite does not choose the product aesthetic, authorize a dependency, or
make motion mandatory. Use design-engineering-quality to select the minimum
capability and preserve explicit-only gates.
Structural-donor rule
External components may donate interaction structure, accessibility behavior, layout ideas, or implementation techniques. Replace their copy, tokens, fonts, colors, geometry, effects, and branding with the product’s approved system.
Tokenization boundary
Complete the visual direction before invoking design-tokens. Tokens encode
approved reusable decisions; they do not choose those decisions.
For color, define semantic roles and foreground/background relationships across every required mode. A palette is not approved merely because its swatches look attractive. Record contrast evidence and how brand colors behave in actions, surfaces, focus, feedback, data visualization, and agent states.
Required output
Update docs/20-design/DESIGN_SYSTEM.md with the reference ledger, synthesis,
visual thesis, system contract, interaction/agentic states, anti-patterns, and
decision provenance. Do not approve implementation from source alone; preserve
Playwright evidence and independent critique as later phases.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

