ce-work
Skill26k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Execute a plan or concrete work prompt end-to-end. Use when implementing from a plan document, a spec path, or a clear build request; use ce-debug for open-ended bugs. Use when an outer orchestrator needs implementation and local verification only, without the shipping tail.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Done: Every in-scope task is complete, required verification evidence is recorded, relevant checks pass, and the run reaches either its …
- Very specific: line 24
Before any other input decision, read references/input-triage.md.
- Distinctive: line 28
If that reference cannot be read, stop.
- Very specific: line 30
When triage selects Return-to-Caller Mode, read references/return-to-caller.md immediately and record that it governs how this run ends.
- Very specific: line 40
If cross-model execution is selected, read references/cross-model-execution.md before any content or authority crosses to the other model.
- Very specific: line 42
Before choosing inline, serial, or parallel execution, and before dispatching any worker, read references/execution-strategy.md.
- Very specific: line 46
Before the first implementation write, including on the Trivial route, read references/implementation-loop.md.
- Very specific: line 52
After the tasks and local verification are complete, standalone mode reads references/shipping-workflow.md before any quality check or …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Work Execution Command
Outcome
- Result: A fully implemented, locally verified change set from a plan, specification, or concrete work prompt.
- Next consumer: In standalone use, the shipping workflow takes the verified change through review and delivery. In Return-to-Caller Mode, the invoking workflow receives the structured implementation and verification result and owns its remaining gates.
- Done: Every in-scope task is complete, required verification evidence is recorded, relevant checks pass, and the run reaches either its owned shipping handoff (with a code-review receipt or explicit skip phrase — see Phase 3-4), a complete return result, or an explicit blocker.
- Intent: Finish the requested feature without renegotiating the plan or transferring canonical integration authority. Workers receive bounded units; the host orchestrator inspects actual changes and owns authoritative verification and canonical commits.
Execution Workflow
Bundled references must be read, never approximated. Resolve each reference or script path named below from this skill's loaded SKILL.md directory, using the full skill path the harness supplied, and never glob the target repository to find a bundled file. Read each reference when you enter the phase it governs; a read made before that phase does not satisfy it, and a reference this file says to read again is read again at its step even when already in context. If the harness does not expose the skill directory, or a required file cannot be read, stop before the action it governs and report which file is missing. Do not reconstruct its rules from memory; report the missing reference instead of continuing natively.
Phase 0: Input Triage
Recovery activation comes first. Before classifying the input as a plan, a path, a blank, or a bare prompt, recognize requests to resume, inspect, reap, or clean up an existing run. Recovery never dispatches a new worker, selects a new route, discovers another plan, reruns completed verification, or enters either shipping path. If the run id is missing, ask for it; never guess one.
Before any other input decision, read references/input-triage.md. It decides source resolution, control tokens, recovery, read-only discovery, plan readiness, non-code routing, blank input, and bare-prompt sizing. Three rules from it hold here:
- A bare prompt that is Trivial — one or two files, no behavioral change — skips the task list but still resolves its execution engine before writing. A purely mechanical diff also ships without a post-PR watch. When either is uncertain, take the fuller route.
- A bare prompt that
ce-planalready sized in this session is executed, not planned again. A decision the user would weigh is asked as a question, never as a route back toce-planorce-brainstorm. - If that reference cannot be read, stop; never treat control tokens or a non-executable artifact as code work.
When triage selects Return-to-Caller Mode, read references/return-to-caller.md immediately and record that it governs how this run ends. If it cannot be read, stop before any mutation; do not fall back to standalone behavior.
Phase 1: Quick Start
Establish the workspace. Before moving branches, editing, dispatching, or committing, read
references/workspace-setup.md. It decides the writable checkout, plan clarification, branch placement, the pre-work inventory, already-dirty files, and task setup. Never write without a writable canonical checkout, and never write on the real default branch unless the user explicitly directed that in this session.Do not commit or publish anything the user did not offer. When a unit needs a file that was already dirty, standalone mode asks once whether to include or exclude that file. Return-to-Caller Mode neither asks nor edits it; it returns blocked, naming the collision and how to recover.
Resolve the engine, then strategy. After bounded plan intake and task derivation, but before selecting a unit for execution, writing, dispatching, or committing, read
references/execution-engines.mdand complete its route selection. It applies with or without a typed binding; native execution is eligible only when that reference selects it or exhausts an allowed fallback. The engine choice never changes which reference governs how the run ends.If cross-model execution is selected, read
references/cross-model-execution.mdbefore any content or authority crosses to the other model. It defines controller initialization, the post-init engine lock, bounded egress, transactions, recovery, and receipts.Before choosing inline, serial, or parallel execution, and before dispatching any worker, read
references/execution-strategy.md. It decides scheduling, isolation, the packet each worker receives, worker lifecycle, and integration. The host orchestrator keeps authoritative verification and makes the canonical commits.
Phase 2: Execute
Before the first implementation write, including on the Trivial route, read references/implementation-loop.md. It decides how evidence is chosen, verification, when to stop a unit, incremental commits, following existing patterns, continuous testing, where simplification stops, UI work, progress tracking, and settled decisions.
The commit rule from this file stays in force throughout: every implementation commit names only that unit's owned files. A bare git commit can absorb the user's pre-existing index, so it is forbidden.
Phase 3-4: Quality Check and Finishing Work
After the tasks and local verification are complete, standalone mode reads references/shipping-workflow.md before any quality check or delivery. It decides simplification, code-review receipts and fallbacks, leftover findings, final validation, and delivery.
Code-review completion gate (standalone only). Code review must actually happen before shipping. The run is not done, must not call a commit or shipping skill, and must not report that shipping is complete until the shipping reference has recorded either an actual completed ce-code-review receipt or one of its exact authorized skip states. Never substitute a mental self-review or findings already applied earlier. This rule does not apply in Return-to-Caller Mode.
Return-to-Caller Mode
Return-to-Caller Mode performs implementation and local verification only. It must not enter Phase 3-4 or run final simplification, code review, PR creation, CI watching, babysitting, or any other standalone shipping action; the caller owns those steps.
Immediately before emitting the result, read references/return-to-caller.md again. It alone defines the full return result, the check that evidence is complete, the route and model records, recovery semantics, and standalone_shipping_skipped: true. Do not build a complete result from this file.
If that required read fails after planning or implementation created state, preserve every changed file, commit, workspace, and controller record. Return the minimum blocked result from this file: status: blocked, plan_path, run_id when known, changed_state, blockers naming the missing reference, and recovery_path. Do not erase partial state, report success, or fall into the standalone shipping path.
Trending
Steady: 0 new projects took it in the last 4 weeks, none the 4 weeks before.thin data
Who's talking about EveryInc/every-marketplace
- AI LABS“How to 10X Your Claude Code Workflow”YouTube · Oct 12, 2025 · 28k views
- A Hacker News story“Compounding Engineering for Claude Code”Hacker News · Oct 11, 2025 · 2 points
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin“Request to merge PR #11 - Comprehensive standardization”GitHub · Nov 11, 2025 · 1 reactions
- aj-ebels/rapid-scribe“Add Every compound-engineering plugin marketplace to project settings”GitHub · Jul 7, 2026
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin“Installing via README vs guide”GitHub · Feb 25, 2026
The biggest 5 of 12 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 12
Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Hacker News (12 times).
On GitHub · 10
- Nov 11, 2025Request to merge PR #11 - Comprehensive standardization — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin1 reaction · 1 comment
- Jul 7, 2026Add Every compound-engineering plugin marketplace to project settings — aj-ebels/rapid-scribe0 reactions
- Feb 25, 2026Installing via README vs guide — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 3 comments
- Nov 30, 2025Compound engineering Command not installed with Droid — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 8 comments
- Nov 25, 2025feat: Add plan mode support to /issue, /architect, and /product-manager commands — psd401/psd-claude-plugins0 reactions · 1 comment
5 more on GitHub
- Nov 18, 2025Install compounding-engineering plugin from Every marketplace — ThePharmer/stepmania0 reactions
- Nov 13, 2025Enhance issue with planner — minyk/lazy-bird0 reactions
- Nov 6, 2025feat: install Compounding Engineering plugin from Every marketplace — nerdymil30/gmail_classifier_speckit0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2025Add one-command installation option via Claude Plugins CLI — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 10, 2025Claude v 2.013 - Failed to closne repository.. — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 1 comment
On YouTube · 1
- Oct 12, 2025How to 10X Your Claude Code Workflow — AI LABS28k views · 197 comments
On Hacker News · 1
- Oct 11, 2025Compounding Engineering for Claude Code2 points
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 3
- EveryInc/compounding-engineering-plugin★ 26k100% same
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin★ 26k100% same
- kieranklaassen/compound-engineering-plugin★ 26k100% same
Edited · 1
- MortuisVMain/ai-agent-superpowers★ 048% same
Wrote their own version · 3
- HamedMP/matrix-os★ 82same name
- shyamsridhar123/kevin-copilot★ 7same name
- Pdbjork/hermosskills-site★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ce-skill-workSkill
- ce-babysit-prSkill
- ce-bakeoffSkill
- ce-brainstormSkill
- ce-code-reviewSkill
- ce-commit-push-prSkill
- ce-commitSkill
- ce-compound-refreshSkill
- ce-compoundSkill
- ce-debugSkill
- ce-doc-reviewSkill
- ce-dogfoodSkill
- ce-explainSkill
- ce-handoffSkill
- ce-ideateSkill
- ce-noslopSkill
- ce-optimizeSkill
- ce-planSkill
- ce-polishSkill
- ce-povSkill
- ce-product-pulseSkill
- ce-promoteSkill
- ce-proofSkill
- ce-prototypeSkill
- ce-resolve-pr-feedbackSkill
- ce-retuneSkill
- ce-riffrec-feedback-analysisSkill
- ce-setupSkill
- ce-simplify-codeSkill
- ce-strategySkill
- ce-sweepSkill
- ce-test-browserSkill
- ce-test-xcodeSkill
- ce-worktreeSkill
- lfgSkill
- wtfSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

