ce-ideate
Skill26k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Generate and evaluate grounded ideas. Use when the user wants ideas, improvements, or surprising directions before choosing one to develop. Not for refining an idea they already have (ce-brainstorm) or judging one already on the table (ce-pov).
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Ground before ideating: No advice detached from the repo.
- Distinctive: line 18
Send the user to brainstorming for action: Never skip from ideation output to planning.
- Very specific: line 45
Read references/output-mode.md whenever a format is resolved.
- Very specific: line 52
Do not: use this rule for docs_root — that key is config.yaml only.
- Very specific: line 61
Read references/grounding.md before dispatching any grounding agent.
- Very specific: line 73
Read references/divergent-ideation.md before building any dispatch prompt.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Generate Improvement Ideas
ce-ideate runs before ce-brainstorm. This skill answers "which ideas are worth exploring?" ce-brainstorm then answers what one chosen idea should mean. ce-plan answers how it gets built.
Done: a ranked ideation artifact is written to <root>/ideation/ when that root is present, else to a CE temp path. Every idea generated has been critiqued, and the survivors are explained. The user is left holding the next-steps menu. No requirements, plans, or code.
Boundaries
- Ground before ideating. No advice detached from the repo.
- Generate many, critique all, explain survivors only. Generate the full candidate list before critiquing any of it. Rejection is explicit and carries a reason; this is not optimistic ranking.
- Send the user to brainstorming for action. Never skip from ideation output to planning.
- Never dispatch on an unidentified subject. Ask instead, through the host's blocking question tool already in the current tool list (match by capability, not by a host-specific name). Presence in the current tool list is proof the tool exists; never call a user-facing question tool to discover whether it exists. If a matching tool is listed but unloaded, use the host's tool-discovery primitive to load that capability — do not search for another host's tool name. Where no such tool is in the list, or a real question call errors, offer numbered options on the user-visible surface. Never skip a question silently. Keep "Surprise me" a real option, alongside a Cancel that exits cleanly. Do not ask about solution direction, constraints, audience, tone, or success criteria;
ce-brainstormasks those. If it takes more than 3 questions, ideation is the wrong workflow. - Never print the internal taxonomy label. The labels
repo-grounded,elsewhere-software, andelsewhere-non-softwareonly decide which agents to dispatch. Describe the mode to the user in the topic's own words. - Warn and proceed when grounding fails.
- Show the user the cost line before dispatching.
The focus hint is any optional context this run was invoked with, from the user or from a calling skill. The rest of this skill calls it {focus_hint}.
Artifact Root
Artifacts go under <root>/ideation/, and learnings are read from <root>/solutions/. Resolve <root> only when you are about to compose one of those paths, and never before the mode is classified — an elsewhere or no-repo run writes to a temp directory and never needs it. Pass a subagent the resolved path, not the config.
<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->Resolve the CE artifact root <root> before composing any artifact path.
- Read
docs_rootfrom<repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yamlonly (<repo-root>=git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Do not read it fromconfig.local.yaml. Unset -><root>isdocs, exactly as before. - Validate a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under
.git/. Otherwise stop with an error namingdocs_rootand the value -- never fall back todocs. - Use
<root>as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as<root>/<subdir>with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also readdocs.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->Phase 0: Resume and Scope
Both reads this phase names are required, even when the subject, mode, and format look clear. Those two references define the resume check, the format decision, and the scope classification. Nothing here is resolved before reading them.
Output mode is exclusive. A run produces HTML (.html) or markdown (.md), never both. Precedence runs from a request in this prompt, through a stated user preference and config (ideate_output:), down to the html default; a headless run resolves the format the same way, with no pipeline override.
Read references/output-mode.md whenever a format is resolved. The read is required. It defines each step of the decision, and the 30-day recent-work check that decides whether this run updates an existing doc instead of writing a new one.
<!-- ce-config-layers:start -->Resolve ordinary CE yaml keys from the two repo files.
- Read
<repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.local.yaml, thenconfig.yaml(<repo-root>=git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Missing files are skipped. Gitignore does not change resolution. - Win with the first active (non-commented) value. For scalars, empty is unset; an invalid value continues to the next layer, then the skill default. For lists and maps, a present key — including an empty list or map — replaces the whole key.
- Do not use this rule for
docs_root— that key isconfig.yamlonly.
<!-- ce-config-layers:end -->Non-software routing. A topic that is not about software runs elsewhere-mode grounding rather than the repo scan. It then follows references/universal-ideation.md in place of Phase 2's frames and the Phase 5 menu. The deliverable is still written automatically.
The Phase 0 checks. references/scope-gates.md defines every Phase 0 check, plus what changes in surprise-me and tactical runs. Ask when the subject is not identifiable. go deep beats a tactical signal.
Phase 1: Mode-Aware Grounding
Read references/grounding.md before dispatching any grounding agent. The read is required. That reference defines every dispatch in this phase, including the routing test that runs before either dispatch block. Grounding runs in parallel, in the foreground.
A generic subagent is one whose whole brief is the prompt you send it. When the host's subagent tool makes you name an agent, use only a name you have seen the host list, and list its agents before the first dispatch if you have not. Pick the plain one that adds no role of its own, which still counts as a generic subagent. Never pick a specialist, such as a reviewer or worker agent, whose own role prompt, output format, or tool limits would replace or narrow your prompt.
Scratch lives beneath the effective user's private CE root: /tmp/compound-engineering-<uid> when that is usable, else the validated $TMPDIR fallback, and never .context/. Generate one 8-hex <run-id> and reuse it for the cache and for every checkpoint.
Phase 1.5: Topic-Surface Decomposition
Before frames are dispatched, decompose the topic into 3-5 orthogonal axes — what aspects of the subject to think about. Read references/decomposition.md. Surprise-me mode is the only case that skips this phase. That file's own criteria decide whether a subject is too small to split, so make that judgment after the read. Append the axis list, or the skip reason, to the grounding summary under Topic axes.
Phase 2: Divergent Ideation
Read references/divergent-ideation.md before building any dispatch prompt. The fleet, the frames, and the generation rules live only there. When its merge, synthesis, and axis-coverage steps are complete, continue with references/post-ideation-workflow.md, which it names as the next required read.
Trending
Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository
Who's talking about EveryInc/every-marketplace
- AI LABS“How to 10X Your Claude Code Workflow”YouTube · Oct 12, 2025 · 28k views
- A Hacker News story“Compounding Engineering for Claude Code”Hacker News · Oct 11, 2025 · 2 points
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin“Request to merge PR #11 - Comprehensive standardization”GitHub · Nov 11, 2025 · 1 reactions
- aj-ebels/rapid-scribe“Add Every compound-engineering plugin marketplace to project settings”GitHub · Jul 7, 2026
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin“Installing via README vs guide”GitHub · Feb 25, 2026
The biggest 5 of 12 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
See all 12
Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Hacker News (12 times).
On GitHub · 10
- Nov 11, 2025Request to merge PR #11 - Comprehensive standardization — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin1 reaction · 1 comment
- Jul 7, 2026Add Every compound-engineering plugin marketplace to project settings — aj-ebels/rapid-scribe0 reactions
- Feb 25, 2026Installing via README vs guide — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 3 comments
- Nov 30, 2025Compound engineering Command not installed with Droid — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 8 comments
- Nov 25, 2025feat: Add plan mode support to /issue, /architect, and /product-manager commands — psd401/psd-claude-plugins0 reactions · 1 comment
5 more on GitHub
- Nov 18, 2025Install compounding-engineering plugin from Every marketplace — ThePharmer/stepmania0 reactions
- Nov 13, 2025Enhance issue with planner — minyk/lazy-bird0 reactions
- Nov 6, 2025feat: install Compounding Engineering plugin from Every marketplace — nerdymil30/gmail_classifier_speckit0 reactions
- Oct 15, 2025Add one-command installation option via Claude Plugins CLI — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 1 comment
- Oct 10, 2025Claude v 2.013 - Failed to closne repository.. — EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin0 reactions · 1 comment
On YouTube · 1
- Oct 12, 2025How to 10X Your Claude Code Workflow — AI LABS28k views · 197 comments
On Hacker News · 1
- Oct 11, 2025Compounding Engineering for Claude Code2 points
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 2
- EveryInc/compounding-engineering-plugin★ 26k100% same
- EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin★ 26k100% same
Edited · 2
- kieranklaassen/compound-engineering-plugin★ 26k97% same
- MortuisVMain/ai-agent-superpowers★ 083% same
Wrote their own version · 3
- vredin/vredin-CC-Harness★ 9same name
- shyamsridhar123/kevin-copilot★ 7same name
- Pdbjork/hermosskills-site★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository37 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ce-skill-workSkill
- ce-babysit-prSkill
- ce-bakeoffSkill
- ce-brainstormSkill
- ce-code-reviewSkill
- ce-commit-push-prSkill
- ce-commitSkill
- ce-compound-refreshSkill
- ce-compoundSkill
- ce-debugSkill
- ce-doc-reviewSkill
- ce-dogfoodSkill
- ce-explainSkill
- ce-handoffSkill
- ce-noslopSkill
- ce-optimizeSkill
- ce-planSkill
- ce-polishSkill
- ce-povSkill
- ce-product-pulseSkill
- ce-promoteSkill
- ce-proofSkill
- ce-prototypeSkill
- ce-resolve-pr-feedbackSkill
- ce-retuneSkill
- ce-riffrec-feedback-analysisSkill
- ce-setupSkill
- ce-simplify-codeSkill
- ce-strategySkill
- ce-sweepSkill
- ce-test-browserSkill
- ce-test-xcodeSkill
- ce-workSkill
- ce-worktreeSkill
- lfgSkill
- wtfSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

