agentleFS
EveryIncEveryInc/every-marketplace/skills/ce-dogfood/SKILL.md

ce-dogfood

Skill26k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Hands-off, diff-scoped browser QA of the active branch: maps user flows, drives a real browser, autonomously fixes small breakages with regression tests and commits, judges experience against product personas, and writes a durable dogfood report. Manual invocation only.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never dogfood the trunk on a branch-name or blank target — there is no diff.

    line 21
  2. Very specific:

    Never switch the primary checkout out from under the user.

    line 23

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Dogfood

Act as a QA engineer who dogfoods the active branch end-to-end, autonomously, until it is genuinely ready.

Outcome: every user-visible change this branch introduced has been driven in a real browser along its whole journey, judged for correctness and for how it feels to the product's personas, with small breakages fixed, regression-tested, and committed. Done: every matrix scenario is Pass, Fixed, Skipped, or in a terminal Blocked state; the project's automated suite has been run once and its result recorded; and the report at <root>/dogfood-reports/<YYYY-MM-DD>-<branch-slug>-dogfood.md is finalized against its template and committed. A green matrix over a red suite finalizes as a not-ready verdict rather than a ready one. Chasing that suite green is not this run's job.

This is diff-scoped, not whole-app exploration. You test what this branch introduced or modified versus the trunk.

Read references/phases.md before Phase 0 (Scope) and follow it. It defines every phase in detail; the run cannot be executed correctly from the phase list below.

Boundaries

  • Drive one browser for the whole run. Prefer a built-in browser over the agent-browser CLI when it can cover the matrix; Phase 3 in references/phases.md says how to find and choose one. Never add a third stack: no standalone Playwright or Puppeteer, no separately configured extension or MCP such as mcp__claude-in-chrome__*, no npx agent-browser.
  • Never dogfood the trunk on a branch-name or blank target — there is no diff. A PR target always has a base, so it is always diffable even when its head branch is named main.
  • A numeric target stays a PR identity through isolation and checkout — never collapse it to its head ref, whose name may itself be main.
  • Never switch the primary checkout out from under the user. Isolate a PR or another named ref through ce-worktree without asking; ce-worktree owns the mechanics and reports the verdict. A blank or current-branch target runs in place.
  • Screenshots and other transient artifacts go to OS temp (mktemp -d "${TMPDIR:-/tmp}/ce-dogfood-XXXXXX"), never the repo root; copy one in only to embed it in the report.
  • Auto-fix only what is small, well-understood, and low-risk. A change that needs an architectural or schema decision, alters product behavior or UX intent, spans many files, or has plausible competing solutions is escalated to the report's Decisions for a human section, never implemented to clear a matrix item.

Prerequisites

User-runnable invocation rendering. In prerequisite failures, default to /ce-setup and /ce-dogfood <original arguments>; use $ce-setup and $ce-dogfood <original arguments> only when the active host is Codex or explicitly documents dollar-prefixed skill invocation. On oh-my-pi (omp), use /skill:ce-setup and /skill:ce-dogfood <original arguments>. Render only each invocation as inline code and output one form only.

  • A local dev server you can start (bin/dev, rails server, npm run dev, etc.).
  • A browser per the Boundaries. When the run needs agent-browser and it is not installed, stop and tell the user to install it: print the rendered ce-setup invocation for the current install command, followed by the rendered ce-dogfood <original arguments> invocation to retry.

Artifact Root

Reports live under <root>/dogfood-reports/ and personas under <root>/personas/. Resolve <root> the first time you compose any <root>/ path, whether you are reading or writing, and never before. A run that composes none skips it.

<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->

Resolve the CE artifact root <root> before composing any artifact path.

  • Read docs_root from <repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yaml only (<repo-root> = git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Do not read it from config.local.yaml. Unset -> <root> is docs, exactly as before.
  • Validate a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under .git/. Otherwise stop with an error naming docs_root and the value -- never fall back to docs.
  • Use <root> as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as <root>/<subdir> with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also read docs.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->

Delegation

ce-dogfood is an orchestrator: prefer an existing CE skill over re-deriving its behavior. Isolate a PR or named-branch target with ce-worktree; take a non-obvious root cause to ce-debug; commit each fix with ce-commit; capture a reusable lesson with ce-compound.

Compound Packs

The repo's declared Compound Packs supply personas and criteria. A pack rule that describes a user is a persona the flows are walked as; one that prescribes how the product must look or behave is a criterion each scenario it reaches is judged against, and a contradiction is a failure that enters the fix loop with its (pack: <id>, <path within the pack>) citation. A contradiction the branch intends is a decision for a human about the rule, not a fix. Judgments that generalize go back to the packs through ce-compound; this skill never writes a pack. references/phases.md defines how packs are applied.

Phase order

Scope -> analyze the diff -> map the flows -> derive the matrix -> serve -> execute -> fix loop -> report. The order is the invariant: the flow model precedes the matrix, and the matrix precedes any browser work. Work one scenario at a time, judged for correctness and for how it feels to each persona. A fix is not done until a regression test fails before it and passes after, or the report says why no automated test was meaningful.

Checkpoint, not a final write. Create the report from references/dogfood-report-template.md as soon as the matrix exists, with every scenario at Pending, and update it after each scenario is judged and each fix is committed. The task list is session-scoped, but the report on disk is what a later run or a teammate resumes from, so an interrupted run must leave a template-shaped checkpoint rather than a bare matrix.

Involving a person. Stop and ask only in two cases. The first is when the run cannot continue without something only the user has, such as secrets the app needs to start. The second is when the next step would change the user's own work, such as switching their checkout. Everything else a person must do is recorded and handed back once, at the end. Blocked (needs human verify) (an outside-service leg that the branch changed and that no local stand-in covers) and Blocked (human decision) (a fix too big to make autonomously) are those records. Each ends that scenario, not the run: continue the rest of the matrix, and never silently re-queue a blocked scenario, on this run or on resume.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 1 mentionMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the EveryInc/every-marketplace repository that our weekly crawl found: only 12 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about EveryInc/every-marketplace

The biggest 5 of 12 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 12

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Hacker News (12 times).

On GitHub · 10

5 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 1

On Hacker News · 1

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.