agentleFS
EveryIncEveryInc/every-marketplace/skills/ce-setup/SKILL.md

ce-setup

Skill26k starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Check Compound Engineering health and repo-local config, scaffold a Compound Pack with `pack:<id>`, or draft or refresh coding standards and review docs with `standards`.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. 4 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If a version is found, pass it to the check script via --version.

    line 42
  2. Common:

    Before running the script, display:

    line 46
  3. Very specific:

    Run the bundled check script.

    line 52
  4. Very specific:

    Use the same command without --version VERSION if Step 1 could not determine a version.

    line 59
  5. Very specific:

    If the script is unavailable, run the inline equivalent listed in references/repo-fixes.md.

    line 61
  6. Common:

    After the health report, decide Phase 2 from writable-checkout availability:

    line 69
  7. Very specific:

    If this session has a writable git checkout, run Phase 2 locally, including when project_issues is 0.

    line 71
  8. Common:

    If this session has no writable checkout, but the user named a repository and the harness exposes a remote repo-work surface with a …

    line 72
  9. Common:

    If optional tools are missing, do not offer a bulk install.

    line 79
  10. Distinctive:

    Every change to a user-owned file is offered and applied only if the user approves.

    line 85

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Compound Engineering Setup

Interaction Method

Ask each question below using the host's blocking question tool already in the current tool list (match by capability, not by a host-specific name). Presence in the current tool list is proof the tool exists; never call a user-facing question tool to discover whether it exists. If a matching tool is listed but unloaded, use the host's tool-discovery primitive to load that capability — do not search for another host's tool name. Fall back to a numbered list on the host's user-visible chat surface only when no such tool is in the list or a real question call errors. Never silently skip or auto-configure.

ce-setup is a lightweight health check and repo-local config helper. It does not bulk-install every optional dependency. Missing tools are reported as optional capabilities so the user can install only the workflows they use.

Pack Scaffold

When the invocation names a Compound Pack to add, create, or scaffold (the pack:<id> argument, or the same request in words), read references/pack-scaffold.md from this skill's directory and follow it in place of Phases 1-2 (Diagnose and Fix Repo-Local Issues): it writes the pack and its config entry only after the user approves, runs the health check itself, and reports into Phase 3 (Summary).

Review Docs

When the invocation asks to draft, refresh, or update coding standards or review docs (the standards argument, or the same request in words), read references/project-docs.md and follow it in place of Phases 1-2, drafting the whole set of files even when the request names one. Report into Phase 3.

Artifact Root Resolution

Every Compound Engineering skill that writes or reads an artifact directory (solutions, plans, ideation, and the other CE-owned trees) resolves its root through the rule below. ce-setup carries the canonical statement and reports the resolved root so an operator can confirm where artifacts land before running other skills.

<!-- ce-docs-root:start -->

Resolve the CE artifact root <root> before composing any artifact path.

  • Read docs_root from <repo-root>/.compound-engineering/config.yaml only (<repo-root> = git rev-parse --show-toplevel). Do not read it from config.local.yaml. Unset -> <root> is docs, exactly as before.
  • Validate a set value: a repo-relative directory whose real, symlink-resolved path stays inside the repo and is neither the repo root nor under .git/. Otherwise stop with an error naming docs_root and the value -- never fall back to docs.
  • Use <root> as the sole artifact location: create it if absent, compose each path as <root>/<subdir> with this skill's own subdirectory, and never also read docs.
<!-- ce-docs-root:end -->

Phase 1: Diagnose

Step 1: Determine Plugin Version

Detect the installed compound-engineering plugin version by reading the plugin metadata or manifest when the platform exposes it. If the version cannot be determined, skip this step.

If a version is found, pass it to the check script via --version. Otherwise omit the flag.

Step 2: Run the Health Check

Before running the script, display:

Compound Engineering -- checking your environment...

Run the bundled check script. Set SKILL_DIR to the absolute directory you loaded this ce-setup SKILL.md from — the Bash tool's CWD is the user's project, not the skill dir, so a bare scripts/ path will not resolve:

SKILL_DIR="<absolute path of the directory containing this SKILL.md>";
if [ -f "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/check-health" ]; then bash "$SKILL_DIR/scripts/check-health" --version VERSION; else echo "Bundled health script not found at $SKILL_DIR/scripts/check-health; run the inline checks from ce-setup instead."; fi

Use the same command without --version VERSION if Step 1 could not determine a version.

If the script is unavailable, run the inline equivalent listed in references/repo-fixes.md.

Display the diagnostic output to the user. Missing optional tools are not setup failures. The health report includes the resolved artifact root and which config layer supplied it (per Artifact Root Resolution above); show that line so the operator can confirm where CE artifacts will be written. Missing config.yaml is a reported absence, not a project issue.

Step 3: Decide Whether Fixes Are Needed

Repo-local fixes the health report names apply only to the checkout that report diagnosed. If Phase 2 will write to a different writable checkout, diagnose that checkout first. Session-level findings such as plugin version and optional tools still come from this session's Phase 1.

After the health report, decide Phase 2 from writable-checkout availability:

  • If this session has a writable git checkout, run Phase 2 locally, including when project_issues is 0. Phase 2 always refreshes the example and always offers to create config.yaml when that file is missing.
  • If this session has no writable checkout, but the user named a repository and the harness exposes a remote repo-work surface with a writable checkout, run Phase 2 on that surface instead and report the remote repo-local fixes in Phase 3.
  • Otherwise skip Phase 2 and go to Phase 3, saying repo-local writes were skipped because no writable checkout is available.

Two offers concern this machine rather than the checkout, so they stand whether or not Phase 2 runs. If the report names a legacy Compound Codex tool map, offer to remove it following references/legacy-codex-tool-map.md from this skill's directory. If the bundled health script reported the node row available, offer to warm the npm cache for cross-model peers following references/acpx-cache-warm.md.

Phase 2 remediates every project issue the report names, each in its own step of references/repo-fixes.md. That includes a ce-work implementation engine the report marks unavailable or invalid, retired scalar routing keys, and malformed dormant work_engine_preferences or work_engine_effort.

If optional tools are missing, do not offer a bulk install. The diagnostic already printed the relevant install command or project URL. Say: "Install optional tools only for the workflows you use."

Phase 2: Fix Repo-Local Issues

Read references/repo-fixes.md from this skill's directory before making any repo-local change. It carries Steps 4-10: removing the obsolete compound-engineering.local.md, refreshing the example config, offering to create config.yaml, repairing invalid work_engine_preferences and docs_root, the two .gitignore offers, and the agent-instructions offers (a knowledge-store mention, the compounding directive, and the chat-register directive for ce-noslop), and the offer to draft the project's review docs.

Every change to a user-owned file is offered and applied only if the user approves.

Phase 3: Summary

User-runnable invocation rendering. In setup summaries, default to /ce-setup; use $ce-setup only when the active host is Codex or explicitly documents dollar-prefixed skill invocation. On oh-my-pi (omp), use /skill:ce-setup. Render only the invocation as inline code and output one form only.

Display a brief summary:

✅ Compound Engineering setup complete

Fixed:     <fixes applied, or none>
Skipped:   <fixes declined, or none>
Optional:  <missing optional tools, or all available>

Run `<rendered invocation>` anytime to re-check.

Download now (ZIP)

Trending

Quiet since July.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 1 mentionMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 1 mentionAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the EveryInc/every-marketplace repository that our weekly crawl found: only 12 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Who's talking about EveryInc/every-marketplace

The biggest 5 of 12 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 12

Talked about on GitHub, YouTube and Hacker News (12 times).

On GitHub · 10

5 more on GitHub

On YouTube · 1

On Hacker News · 1

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.