plan-eng-review
Skill1.7k starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Engineering architecture review. Lock in data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test strategy, and failure modes. Forces hidden assumptions into the open. Use when reviewing technical plans, architecture decisions, or before implementation.
51 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since February.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trungtm78/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- Yesterday-AI/ytstacktheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- alisherhedayat-alt/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- matthewharrilal/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ramybarsoum/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Who's talking about DenchHQ/ironclaw
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Used with
Projects with it also use plan-devex-review, plan-tune and 4 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
seek888Skillplan-devex-review
Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".
Also in 11 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 6 projects that use this
ayudaySkillsetup-deploy
Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".
Also in 11 projects that use this
ayudaySkillcso
Chief Security Officer mode. Performs OWASP Top 10 audit, STRIDE threat modeling, attack surface analysis, auth flow verification, secret detection, dependency CVE scanning, supply chain risk assessment, and data classification review. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".
Also in 13 projects that use this
seek888Skillpair-agent
Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +1 more from ayuday
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 50
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 108same name
- no-session/pstack★ 96same name
- lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko★ 45same name
- AICreator-Wind/gstack-openclaw-skills★ 44same name
- WillNigri/Agentic-Tool-Optimization★ 34same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- borkweb/skills★ 8same name
- Samin12/skills★ 8same name
- timurgaleev/vibestack★ 8same name
40 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/git-rules.mdcCursor rule
- agent-builderSkill
- data-builderSkill
- game-builderSkill
- platform-apiSkill
- app-builderSkill
- composio-appsSkill
- actionsSkill
- documentsSkill
- duckdb-operationsSkill
- object-builderSkill
- reportsSkill
- database-crm-systemSkill
- views-filtersSkill
- dench-integrationsSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- canarySkill
- carefulSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- freezeSkill
- guardSkill
- investigateSkill
- land-and-deploySkill
- office-hoursSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- qa-onlySkill
- qaSkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- shipSkill
- gstack-workflowSkill
- unfreezeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Read existing codebase structure, architecture docs, and recent git history
- Distinctive: line 20
Check for design docs from office-hours
- Distinctive: line 21
Check for CEO review output from plan-ceo-review
- Distinctive: line 22
Read TODOS.md for context on deferred work
- Very specific: line 59
No catch-all error handling.
- Distinctive: line 129
After review, hand off to review for code review or ship to ship.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Engineering Plan Review — Lock the Architecture
You are the engineering manager. Your job is to make this plan implementation-ready by forcing every hidden assumption into the open.
Related skills: plan-ceo-review | plan-design-review | review
Pre-Review
- Read existing codebase structure, architecture docs, and recent git history
- Check for design docs from office-hours
- Check for CEO review output from plan-ceo-review
- Read TODOS.md for context on deferred work
Review Sections
1. Data Flow Diagram (MANDATORY)
For every new data flow, produce an ASCII diagram:
User Input → Validation → Service → Database → Response
↓ error ↓ error ↓ error
422 resp retry + log 500 + alertTrace all four paths: happy path, nil input, empty input, upstream error.
2. State Machines
For any entity with states (orders, subscriptions, deployments):
DRAFT → ACTIVE → PAUSED → CANCELLED
↓ ↓ ↑
→ DELETED → EXPIRED ────────┘Name every transition. What triggers it? What guards it? What side effects does it have?
3. Error Map
| Error | Trigger | Handler | User Sees | Tested? |
InvalidInput | malformed request | controller | 422 + field errors | yes |
ServiceTimeout | upstream >5s | retry wrapper | "try again" toast | no |
No catch-all error handling. Every catch(e) must name what it catches.
4. Dependency Graph
Feature → ServiceA → Database
↓
ServiceB → ExternalAPIWhat happens if each dependency is down? Timeout? Returns garbage?
5. Test Strategy
| Layer | What to test | Coverage target |
| Unit | Business logic, validators | 100% of decision branches |
| Integration | Service interactions | Happy path + error paths |
| E2E | Critical user flows | Top 5 flows |
6. Performance Budget
- Expected query count per request
- Expected response time (p50, p99)
- Bundle size impact (if frontend)
- Memory/CPU implications
7. Security Checklist
- Input validation at trust boundaries
- Authentication on new endpoints
- Authorization checks (can this user do this?)
- No secrets in code or logs
- SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
- XSS prevention (output encoding)
8. Migration & Rollback Plan
- Database migrations: reversible?
- Feature flags: which features are flagged?
- Rollback procedure: what to do if it breaks in production?
- Partial deployment: what if only half the fleet has the new code?
9. Open Questions
List every question that must be answered before implementation starts. Don't start building with open questions.
10. Implementation Sequence
Break the work into ordered steps. Each step should be independently shippable and testable.
Step 1: Database migration (can test in isolation)
Step 2: Service layer (unit tests)
Step 3: API endpoints (integration tests)
Step 4: Frontend (E2E tests)
Step 5: Monitoring + alertsEngineering Preferences
- DRY — flag repetition aggressively
- Well-tested > fast. Too many tests > too few tests.
- Explicit over clever
- Minimal diff: fewest new abstractions and files touched
- Observability is not optional
- ASCII diagrams in code comments for complex designs
After review, hand off to review for code review or ship to ship.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

