agentleFS
DenchHQDenchHQ/ironclaw/skills/gstack/plan-eng-review/SKILL.md

plan-eng-review

Skill1.7k starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Engineering architecture review. Lock in data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test strategy, and failure modes. Forces hidden assumptions into the open. Use when reviewing technical plans, architecture decisions, or before implementation.

51 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

Quiet since February.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 1 mentionMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 0 mentionsSep 2026: 0 mentionsOct 2026: 0 mentionsNov 2026: 0 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the DenchHQ/ironclaw repository that our weekly crawl found: only 1 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about DenchHQ/ironclaw

The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

Used with

Projects with it also use plan-devex-review, plan-tune and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • seek888Skill

    plan-devex-review

    Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • ShreyRaviSkill

    plan-tune

    Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    setup-deploy

    Configure deployment settings for /land-and-deploy. Detects your deploy platform (Fly.io, Render, Vercel, Netlify, Heroku, GitHub Actions, custom), production URL, health check endpoints, and deploy status commands. Writes the configuration to CLAUDE.md so all future deploys are automatic. Use when: "setup deploy", "configure deployment", "set up land-and-deploy", "how do I deploy with gstack", "add deploy config".

    Also in 11 projects that use this

  • ayudaySkill

    cso

    Chief Security Officer mode. Performs OWASP Top 10 audit, STRIDE threat modeling, attack surface analysis, auth flow verification, secret detection, dependency CVE scanning, supply chain risk assessment, and data classification review. Use when: "security audit", "threat model", "pentest review", "OWASP", "CSO review".

    Also in 13 projects that use this

  • seek888Skill

    pair-agent

    Pair a remote AI agent with your browser. One command generates a setup key and prints instructions the other agent can follow to connect. Works with OpenClaw, Hermes, Codex, Cursor, or any agent that can make HTTP requests. The remote agent gets its own tab with scoped access (read+write by default, admin on request). Use when asked to "pair agent", "connect agent", "share browser", "remote browser", "let another agent use my browser", or "give browser access". (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "pair agent", "connect agent", "share my browser", "remote browser access".

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • +1 more from ayuday

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 41 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 5

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read existing codebase structure, architecture docs, and recent git history

    line 19
  2. Distinctive:

    Check for design docs from office-hours

    line 20
  3. Distinctive:

    Check for CEO review output from plan-ceo-review

    line 21
  4. Distinctive:

    Read TODOS.md for context on deferred work

    line 22
  5. Very specific:

    No catch-all error handling.

    line 59
  6. Distinctive:

    After review, hand off to review for code review or ship to ship.

    line 129

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 41 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Engineering Plan Review — Lock the Architecture

You are the engineering manager. Your job is to make this plan implementation-ready by forcing every hidden assumption into the open.

Related skills: plan-ceo-review | plan-design-review | review


Pre-Review

  1. Read existing codebase structure, architecture docs, and recent git history
  2. Check for design docs from office-hours
  3. Check for CEO review output from plan-ceo-review
  4. Read TODOS.md for context on deferred work

Review Sections

1. Data Flow Diagram (MANDATORY)

For every new data flow, produce an ASCII diagram:

User Input → Validation → Service → Database → Response
                ↓ error       ↓ error      ↓ error
              422 resp    retry + log    500 + alert

Trace all four paths: happy path, nil input, empty input, upstream error.

2. State Machines

For any entity with states (orders, subscriptions, deployments):

DRAFT → ACTIVE → PAUSED → CANCELLED
  ↓        ↓                    ↑
  → DELETED  → EXPIRED ────────┘

Name every transition. What triggers it? What guards it? What side effects does it have?

3. Error Map

ErrorTriggerHandlerUser SeesTested?
InvalidInputmalformed requestcontroller422 + field errorsyes
ServiceTimeoutupstream >5sretry wrapper"try again" toastno

No catch-all error handling. Every catch(e) must name what it catches.

4. Dependency Graph

Feature → ServiceA → Database
            ↓
          ServiceB → ExternalAPI

What happens if each dependency is down? Timeout? Returns garbage?

5. Test Strategy

LayerWhat to testCoverage target
UnitBusiness logic, validators100% of decision branches
IntegrationService interactionsHappy path + error paths
E2ECritical user flowsTop 5 flows

6. Performance Budget

  • Expected query count per request
  • Expected response time (p50, p99)
  • Bundle size impact (if frontend)
  • Memory/CPU implications

7. Security Checklist

  • Input validation at trust boundaries
  • Authentication on new endpoints
  • Authorization checks (can this user do this?)
  • No secrets in code or logs
  • SQL injection prevention (parameterized queries)
  • XSS prevention (output encoding)

8. Migration & Rollback Plan

  • Database migrations: reversible?
  • Feature flags: which features are flagged?
  • Rollback procedure: what to do if it breaks in production?
  • Partial deployment: what if only half the fleet has the new code?

9. Open Questions

List every question that must be answered before implementation starts. Don't start building with open questions.

10. Implementation Sequence

Break the work into ordered steps. Each step should be independently shippable and testable.

Step 1: Database migration (can test in isolation)
Step 2: Service layer (unit tests)
Step 3: API endpoints (integration tests)
Step 4: Frontend (E2E tests)
Step 5: Monitoring + alerts

Engineering Preferences

  • DRY — flag repetition aggressively
  • Well-tested > fast. Too many tests > too few tests.
  • Explicit over clever
  • Minimal diff: fewest new abstractions and files touched
  • Observability is not optional
  • ASCII diagrams in code comments for complex designs

After review, hand off to review for code review or ship to ship.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.