plan-eng-review
Skill2 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub
Reviews the execution approach of a pitch or a sliced milestone for feasibility, architecture, data flow, edge cases, test coverage, performance and security, through the installed gstack plan-eng-review skill. Use after plan-ceo-review on a pitch, or after slice-milestone and before plan-task on M###-S##-PLAN.md; also when the user says eng review, architecture review, lock the approach. Not for scope and ambition questions (plan-ceo-review).
51 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- timurgaleev/vibestacktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- trungtm78/ClaudeSkillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- alisherhedayat-alt/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- matthewharrilal/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ramybarsoum/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- ignavm1/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use qa-only, land-and-deploy and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ramybarsoumSkillqa-only
Report-only QA testing. Systematically tests a web application and produces a structured report with health score, screenshots, and repro steps, but never fixes anything. Use when asked to "just report bugs", "qa report only", or "test but don't fix". For the full test-fix-verify loop, use /qa instead. Proactively suggest when the user wants a bug report without any code changes.
Also in 17 projects that use this
ayudaySkillland-and-deploy
Land and deploy workflow. Merges the PR, waits for CI and deploy, verifies production health via canary checks. Takes over after /ship creates the PR. Use when: "merge", "land", "deploy", "merge and verify", "land it", "ship it to production".
Also in 14 projects that use this
seek888Skillplan-devex-review
Interactive developer experience plan review. Explores developer personas, benchmarks against competitors, designs magical moments, and traces friction points before scoring. Three modes: DX EXPANSION (competitive advantage), DX POLISH (bulletproof every touchpoint), DX TRIAGE (critical gaps only). Use when asked to "DX review", "developer experience audit", "devex review", or "API design review". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan for developer-facing products (APIs, CLIs, SDKs, libraries, platforms, docs). (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "dx review", "developer experience review", "devex review", "devex audit", "API design review", "onboarding review".
Also in 11 projects that use this
ramybarsoumSkilldesign-consultation
Design consultation: understands your product, researches the landscape, proposes a complete design system (aesthetic, typography, color, layout, spacing, motion), and generates font+color preview pages. Creates DESIGN.md as your project's design source of truth. For existing sites, use /plan-design-review to infer the system instead. Use when asked to "design system", "brand guidelines", or "create DESIGN.md". Proactively suggest when starting a new project's UI with no existing design system or DESIGN.md.
Also in 18 projects that use this
ayudaySkillunfreeze
Clear the freeze boundary set by /freeze, allowing edits to all directories again. Use when you want to widen edit scope without ending the session. Use when asked to "unfreeze", "unlock edits", "remove freeze", or "allow all edits".
Also in 14 projects that use this
ShreyRaviSkillplan-tune
Self-tuning question sensitivity + developer psychographic for gstack (v1: observational). Review which AskUserQuestion prompts fire across gstack skills, set per-question preferences (never-ask / always-ask / ask-only-for-one-way), inspect the dual-track profile (what you declared vs what your behavior suggests), and enable/disable question tuning. Conversational interface — no CLI syntax required.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +1 more from ramybarsoum
- +3 more from ayuday
Other versions51 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 7
- aryaniyaps/dot-ai★ 150% same
- nileshteji/skills★ 129% same
- Biznomad/claude-skills★ 050% same
- chriswestt/claude-skills★ 050% same
- greenharborlabs/claude-skills★ 025% same
- ignavm1/claude-skills★ 050% same
- Wyx1105170322/claude-skills★ 050% same
Wrote their own version · 44
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7ksame name
- DenchHQ/ironclaw★ 1.7ksame name
- mr-daedalium/ostack-saas★ 108same name
- no-session/pstack★ 96same name
- lucas-flatwhite/gstack-ko★ 45same name
- AICreator-Wind/gstack-openclaw-skills★ 44same name
- WillNigri/Agentic-Tool-Optimization★ 34same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- borkweb/skills★ 8same name
34 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- check-consistencySkill
- adopt-brownfieldSkill
- atomic-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deutschland-stack-apiSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- european-alternatives-apiSkill
- finish-branchSkill
- grillSkill
- handoff-sessionSkill
- init-projectSkill
- minimal-codeSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- oss-projectSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-milestoneSkill
- plan-taskSkill
- quick-taskSkill
- reassess-roadmapSkill
- reconcileSkill
- resume-sessionSkill
- retroSkill
- shipSkill
- slice-milestoneSkill
- software-craftsmanshipSkill
- spawn-milestone-teamSkill
- summarize-taskSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-ytstackSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 42 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 80
Mode = abort: If neither slice-plans nor a pitch artifact exist, abort with: "Run ytstack:office-hours first (concept-mode review) or …
- Very specific: line 82
After the installed gstack plan-eng-review skill completes:
- Very specific: line 91
If MODE is abort: stop with the abort message from the invocation notes (this gate comes first because it needs no gstack).
- Very specific: line 92
If GSTACK_AVAILABLE is no (or unknown): stop.
- Very specific: line 93
If GSTACK_PIN_OK is no: continue, but say once that the installed gstack (GSTACK_VERSION) is older than the version ytstack was tested with.
- Very specific: line 94
If BUN_OK is no: continue, but warn that gstack's helpers need bun >= 1.4.2 and may fail.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 42 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ytstack:plan-eng-review
Thin wrapper around the installed gstack plan-eng-review skill (~/.claude/skills/gstack/plan-eng-review, ytstack tested against v1.96.0.0). Detects the ytstack mode (milestone vs concept), checks the install, invokes the gstack skill through the Skill tool so its procedure runs natively, then applies the outcome to ytstack artifacts. gstack is the single source of truth for the procedure; upstream updates arrive with the install.
ytstack context (resolved at render time)
# ytstack resolver (M016): checkout = where this shell runs, via the shared lib.
_LIB="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/lib/git-ctx.sh"
if [ -f "$_LIB" ]; then
. "$_LIB"; yt_git_ctx "$PWD"; yt_resolve_yt_dir >/dev/null
_PROJECT_DIR="$YT_TOPLEVEL"; _YT_DIR="$YT_DIR"; _YT_SCOPE="$YT_SCOPE"; _IS_GIT="$YT_IS_GIT"; _PROJECT_KEY="$YT_REPO_KEY"
else
# Host did not substitute CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR (e.g. Codex adapter): project scope only.
_IS_GIT=$([ "$(git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null)" = true ] && echo yes || echo no)
_PROJECT_DIR=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd -P)
_YT_DIR=""; _YT_SCOPE=none; _PROJECT_KEY=""
[ -d "$_PROJECT_DIR/.ytstack" ] && { _YT_DIR="$_PROJECT_DIR/.ytstack"; _YT_SCOPE=project; }
fi
cd "$_PROJECT_DIR" 2>/dev/null || true
_PROJECT_SLUG=$(basename "$_PROJECT_DIR")
_CURRENT_MILESTONE=none
if [ -n "$_YT_DIR" ] && [ -f "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" ]; then
_CURRENT_MILESTONE=$(sed -n 's/^current_milestone: *//p' "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" | head -1)
fi
_SLICE_PLANS=""
if [ -n "$_CURRENT_MILESTONE" ] && [ "$_CURRENT_MILESTONE" != "none" ] && [ -d "$_YT_DIR" ]; then
_SLICE_PLANS=$(ls "$_YT_DIR"/$_CURRENT_MILESTONE-S[0-9][0-9]-PLAN.md 2>/dev/null | tr '\n' ' ')
fi
_PITCH=""
if [ -f "./OFFICE-HOURS.md" ]; then
_PITCH="./OFFICE-HOURS.md"
elif [ -n "$_YT_DIR" ]; then
_PITCH=$(ls "$_YT_DIR"/OFFICE-HOURS-*.md 2>/dev/null | head -1)
fi
if [ -n "$_SLICE_PLANS" ]; then
_MODE=milestone
elif [ -n "$_PITCH" ] && [ -f "$_PITCH" ]; then
_MODE=concept
else
_MODE=abort
fi
# gstack precheck (M017): installed dependency, not vendored
if command -v yt_gstack_ctx >/dev/null 2>&1; then
yt_gstack_ctx >/dev/null
echo "GSTACK_AVAILABLE: $YT_GSTACK_AVAILABLE"; echo "GSTACK_DIR: $YT_GSTACK_DIR"; echo "GSTACK_VERSION: ${YT_GSTACK_VERSION:-none}"
echo "GSTACK_PIN_OK: $YT_GSTACK_PIN_OK (pin v$YT_GSTACK_PIN)"; echo "GSTACK_SKILL_OK: $(yt_gstack_skill_ok plan-eng-review)"
echo "BUN_OK: $YT_BUN_OK (${YT_BUN_VERSION:-none})"; echo "GSTACK_INSTALL_CMD: $YT_GSTACK_INSTALL_CMD"
else
echo "GSTACK_AVAILABLE: unknown (shared lib not loaded)"
fi
echo "HAS_YTSTACK: $([ -n "$_YT_DIR" ] && echo yes || echo no)"
echo "MODE: $_MODE"
echo "CURRENT_MILESTONE: $_CURRENT_MILESTONE"
echo "SLICE_PLANS: ${_SLICE_PLANS:-none}"
echo "PITCH: ${_PITCH:-none}"ytstack invocation notes
Two modes, auto-detected above:
Mode = milestone (slice-plans exist). The "plan" being engineering-reviewed is the current milestone's slice-plans. Read those files when the gstack skill asks what to review. Architecture, data flow, edge cases, test coverage, performance.
Mode = concept (no slice-plans yet; pitch artifact produced by ytstack:office-hours exists). The "plan" being engineering-reviewed is the pitch at _PITCH. Focus the review on feasibility + architectural risk of the pitched approach BEFORE any infra is scaffolded: is the target tech stack viable, are there hidden integration complexities, are the perf/scale expectations realistic, are there obvious security / data-handling gaps. Output the feasibility verdict + top 3 risk items. Concept-mode eng review is OPTIONAL per the locked greenfield flow (DECISIONS 2026-04-24); office-hours + plan-ceo-review can proceed to init-project without it.
Mode = abort. If neither slice-plans nor a pitch artifact exist, abort with: "Run ytstack:office-hours first (concept-mode review) or ytstack:slice-milestone first (milestone-mode review). plan-eng-review reviews existing plan content; it does not produce it." Do NOT invoke the gstack skill.
After the installed gstack plan-eng-review skill completes:
- Milestone mode: apply review outcomes by editing the affected slice-plans (add edge cases, adjust tests, tighten scope). Append any locked architectural decision to
DECISIONS.mdin append-only format. - Concept mode: append the feasibility verdict + risk-item list as an annotation block at the top of
_PITCH. If "go", recommendytstack:init-project. If "stop / rescope", recommend revisiting office-hours on the affected question.
HARD-GATE: gstack installed?
This wrapper runs the gstack plan-eng-review skill that is installed on this machine (GSTACK_DIR above; ytstack is tested against gstack v1.96.0.0, bun >= 1.4.2). gstack is not vendored any more (DECISIONS 2026-11-07 "Vendor strategy").
- If
MODEisabort: stop with the abort message from the invocation notes (this gate comes first because it needs no gstack). - If
GSTACK_AVAILABLEisno(orunknown): stop. Tell the user thatytstack:plan-eng-reviewneeds gstack and print the one-line install command fromGSTACK_INSTALL_CMD. Do not improvise the engineering review from memory. - If
GSTACK_PIN_OKisno: continue, but say once that the installed gstack (GSTACK_VERSION) is older than the version ytstack was tested with. - If
BUN_OKisno: continue, but warn that gstack's helpers need bun >= 1.4.2 and may fail.
Procedure
- Invoke the Skill tool with
plan-eng-review(the installed gstack skill, notytstack:plan-eng-review). When it asks what to review, answer fromMODE: milestone -> the files inSLICE_PLANS; concept ->PITCH. Follow it to completion. - Apply the ytstack post-processing for the detected mode from "ytstack invocation notes" above.
- Report the outcome and the recommended next skill. Do NOT auto-invoke any downstream skill.
Checklist
You MUST create a TodoWrite task for each of these items:
- Run preamble -- resolver, mode detection, gstack precheck flags
- HARD-GATE -- abort without plan content; stop with the install command when gstack is missing
- Invoke installed
plan-eng-reviewvia the Skill tool, pointing it at the mode's plan files - Post-process -- slice-plan edits + DECISIONS (milestone) or pitch annotation (concept)
- Report + return -- outcome + next step, no auto-chaining
Terminal State
Return control after reporting the feasibility verdict and the recommended next skill: milestone mode -> ytstack:plan-task (or ytstack:spawn-milestone-team); concept mode -> ytstack:init-project on "go", ytstack:office-hours on "stop / rescope". Abort paths (no plan content, no gstack) return with the message only. Do NOT auto-invoke any downstream skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

