verification-before-completion
Skill2 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
Evidence before any done claim, through the vendored superpowers verification-before-completion procedure with the current task's verification command injected. Use before a commit, before a PR, before summarize-task, before telling the user that something works. Not a substitute for test-first work during implementation (test-driven-development).
189 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- DemonDamon/AgenticXtheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- roundpilot/superpowers-antigravitytheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- REPOZY/superpowers-optimizedtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- lingyired/status-triotheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DJtx001/ai-coding-playbooktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Ai-assistant-KIRA/antigravity-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-code-review
中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈
Also in 8 projects that use this
Leodorareluctant259Skillchinese-commit-conventions
中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化
Also in 8 projects that use this
obraSkilldiagnosing-superpowers
Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.
Also in 20 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-ci
문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-interfaces
API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +3 more from Leodorareluctant259
- +4 more from jh941213
Other versions189 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 189
- obra/superpowers★ 314ksame name
- jnMetaCode/superpowers-zh★ 8.4ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- farm-fe/farm★ 5.6ksame name
- lingyired/status-trio★ 1.8ksame name
- GanyuanRan/Aegis★ 1.4ksame name
- pcvelz/superpowers★ 1.3ksame name
- DemonDamon/AgenticX★ 1ksame name
- coco-research/coco★ 797same name
- pedronauck/skills★ 649same name
179 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- check-consistencySkill
- adopt-brownfieldSkill
- atomic-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- deutschland-stack-apiSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- european-alternatives-apiSkill
- finish-branchSkill
- grillSkill
- handoff-sessionSkill
- init-projectSkill
- minimal-codeSkill
- office-hoursSkill
- oss-projectSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- plan-milestoneSkill
- plan-taskSkill
- quick-taskSkill
- reassess-roadmapSkill
- reconcileSkill
- resume-sessionSkill
- retroSkill
- shipSkill
- slice-milestoneSkill
- software-craftsmanshipSkill
- spawn-milestone-teamSkill
- summarize-taskSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-ytstackSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 177 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 65
After the vendored procedure completes:
- Very specific: line 66
If verification passed: the user may now run ytstack:summarize-task.
- Distinctive: line 67
If verification failed: do NOT auto-retry.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 177 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
ytstack:verification-before-completion
Thin wrapper around the vendored superpowers verification-before-completion skill (vendor/superpowers/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md). Injects the current task's verification command extracted from the task-plan, then inlines the vendored procedure verbatim. Vendor is single source of truth.
ytstack context (resolved at render time)
# ytstack resolver (M016): checkout = where this shell runs, via the shared lib.
_LIB="${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../hooks/lib/git-ctx.sh"
if [ -f "$_LIB" ]; then
. "$_LIB"; yt_git_ctx "$PWD"; yt_resolve_yt_dir >/dev/null
_PROJECT_DIR="$YT_TOPLEVEL"; _YT_DIR="$YT_DIR"; _YT_SCOPE="$YT_SCOPE"; _IS_GIT="$YT_IS_GIT"; _PROJECT_KEY="$YT_REPO_KEY"
else
# Host did not substitute CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR (e.g. Codex adapter): project scope only.
_IS_GIT=$([ "$(git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree 2>/dev/null)" = true ] && echo yes || echo no)
_PROJECT_DIR=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || pwd -P)
_YT_DIR=""; _YT_SCOPE=none; _PROJECT_KEY=""
[ -d "$_PROJECT_DIR/.ytstack" ] && { _YT_DIR="$_PROJECT_DIR/.ytstack"; _YT_SCOPE=project; }
fi
cd "$_PROJECT_DIR" 2>/dev/null || true
_PROJECT_SLUG=$(basename "$_PROJECT_DIR")
_M=none; _S=none; _T=none
if [ -n "$_YT_DIR" ] && [ -f "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" ]; then
_M=$(sed -n 's/^current_milestone: *//p' "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" | head -1)
_S=$(sed -n 's/^active_slice: *//p' "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" | head -1)
_T=$(sed -n 's/^active_task: *//p' "$_YT_DIR/STATE.md" | head -1)
fi
_TASK_PLAN="$_YT_DIR/$_M-$_S-$_T-PLAN.md"
_FENCE=$(printf '\140\140\140')
_VERIFICATION=""
if [ -f "$_TASK_PLAN" ]; then
_VERIFICATION=$(awk -v f="$_FENCE" '
/^## Verification/{in_section=1; next}
/^## /{in_section=0}
in_section && index($0,f)==1 { in_fence=!in_fence; next }
in_section && in_fence { print }
' "$_TASK_PLAN" | head -5)
fi
echo "HAS_YTSTACK: $([ -n "$_YT_DIR" ] && echo yes || echo no)"
echo "ACTIVE_TASK: $_M-$_S-$_T"
echo "TASK_PLAN: $_TASK_PLAN"
echo "TASK_PLAN_EXISTS: $([ -f "$_TASK_PLAN" ] && echo yes || echo no)"
echo "VERIFICATION_CMD_FOUND: $([ -n "$_VERIFICATION" ] && echo yes || echo no)"
if [ -n "$_VERIFICATION" ]; then echo "VERIFICATION_CMD:"; echo "$_VERIFICATION"; fiytstack invocation notes
The command(s) printed above are the current task's verification commands, extracted from the ## Verification section of the task-plan. These are what the vendored procedure must actually execute and confirm output of; do not substitute a different "looks like it should work" command.
HARD-GATE: if TASK_PLAN_EXISTS=no or VERIFICATION_CMD_FOUND=no, abort with: "No verification command in the active task-plan. Either run ytstack:plan-task to add one, or invoke this skill outside a ytstack task context where the user will provide the command." Do not invoke the vendored procedure without a command to verify.
After the vendored procedure completes:
- If verification passed: the user may now run
ytstack:summarize-task. - If verification failed: do NOT auto-retry. Report raw output and hand control back. The user decides next step (fix-and-retry vs re-scope the task).
Vendored procedure (inlined verbatim)
cat "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../vendor/superpowers/skills/verification-before-completion/SKILL.md"Namespace note (ytstack)
The text above is upstream superpowers content (v7.0.2) rendered inside ytstack. Read superpowers:<skill> as ytstack:<skill> and invoke the ytstack-namespaced skill via the Skill tool. Relative links resolve under vendor/superpowers/skills/verification-before-completion/ in the ytstack plugin directory (${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/../../vendor/superpowers/skills/verification-before-completion/); read them from there when you need them.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

