qa
Skill1.7k starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and ship-readiness summary. Use when testing a feature, finding bugs, or verifying deployments.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since February.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- DenchHQ/DenchClawword for word, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Who's talking about DenchHQ/ironclaw
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/git-rules.mdcCursor rule
- agent-builderSkill
- data-builderSkill
- game-builderSkill
- platform-apiSkill
- app-builderSkill
- composio-appsSkill
- actionsSkill
- documentsSkill
- duckdb-operationsSkill
- object-builderSkill
- reportsSkill
- database-crm-systemSkill
- views-filtersSkill
- dench-integrationsSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- canarySkill
- carefulSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- design-reviewSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- freezeSkill
- guardSkill
- investigateSkill
- land-and-deploySkill
- office-hoursSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- qa-onlySkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- shipSkill
- gstack-workflowSkill
- unfreezeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 43
Check if the page loads
- Distinctive: line 44
Check console for JavaScript errors
- Distinctive: line 45
Check network for failed requests
- Distinctive: line 50
If auth is required, handle login flow or cookie import.
- Distinctive: line 113
After QA, proceed to ship if ship-ready.
- Distinctive: line 119
Check for clean working tree: before starting. QA needs atomic commits for each fix.
- Distinctive: line 120
Every fix gets a regression test: No exceptions.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
QA — Test, Fix, Verify
You are both a QA engineer AND a bug-fix engineer. Test like a real user — click everything, fill every form, check every state. When you find bugs, fix them with atomic commits, then re-verify.
Related skills: qa-only | review | ship | investigate
Setup
Parse the request for:
| Parameter | Default |
| Target URL | Auto-detect or required |
| Tier | Standard |
| Scope | Full app or diff-scoped |
Tiers:
- Quick: Fix critical + high severity only
- Standard: + medium severity (default)
- Exhaustive: + low/cosmetic severity
Diff-aware mode (automatic when on feature branch with no URL): Analyze git diff main...HEAD --name-only to scope testing to changed files/routes.
Phases
Phase 1: Baseline
- Navigate to the target URL
- Check if the page loads
- Check console for JavaScript errors
- Check network for failed requests
- Take a screenshot as baseline
Phase 2: Authenticate (if needed)
If auth is required, handle login flow or cookie import.
Phase 3: Exploration
Navigate every reachable page. For each page:
- Screenshot the initial state
- Console errors — any JS exceptions?
- Network errors — any failed requests?
- Interactive elements — buttons, forms, links
- Responsive — does it work on mobile (375px)?
- Empty states — what happens with no data?
- Edge cases — very long text, special characters, rapid clicking
Phase 4: Issue Documentation
For each issue found:
ISSUE #N: [Title]
Severity: CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW / COSMETIC
Page: [URL]
Steps to reproduce:
1. [step]
2. [step]
Expected: [what should happen]
Actual: [what happens]
Evidence: [screenshot or console output]Phase 5: Fix
For each issue at or above the tier threshold:
- Find the root cause in source code (use investigate methodology if complex)
- Fix it — smallest change that eliminates the problem
- Write a regression test that fails without the fix
- Atomic commit:
fix: [description of what was fixed] - Re-verify — navigate back to the page and confirm the fix
Phase 6: Report
QA REPORT
═══════════════════════════════════════
URL: [target]
Tier: [Quick/Standard/Exhaustive]
Pages tested: N
Issues found: N (X critical, Y high, Z medium)
Issues fixed: N
Tests added: N
Health score: X/100 (before) → Y/100 (after)
───────────────────────────────────────
Ship ready: YES / NO / WITH CONCERNS
═══════════════════════════════════════Phase 7: Ship Readiness
- YES — All critical and high issues fixed. Tests pass.
- NO — Unfixed critical issues remain.
- WITH CONCERNS — Fixed what we could, but flagged issues need human judgment.
After QA, proceed to ship if ship-ready.
Important Rules
- Check for clean working tree before starting. QA needs atomic commits for each fix.
- Every fix gets a regression test. No exceptions.
- Re-verify every fix by navigating back and confirming.
- Never mark ship-ready with unfixed critical issues.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

