design-review
Skill1.7k starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Design audit of existing code. Same methodology as plan-design-review, but applies fixes directly with atomic commits and before/after evidence. Use when asked to audit the visual design of implemented code.
155 other projects use a version of this.
Trending
Quiet since February.thin dataabout the whole repository
Most recently taken up by
- KarstenKreh/Standby.Designtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ldaume/agentic-engineering-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- marnickvda/pop-quiztheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DrBradStanfield/roadmaptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ainurdev/mystical-assistanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- openclaw/openclaw-enterprisetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Who's talking about DenchHQ/ironclaw
The biggest 1 of 1 mention linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.
Used with
Projects with it also use project-stage-detect, team-audio and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillproject-stage-detect
Automatically analyze project state, detect stage, identify gaps, and recommend next steps based on existing artifacts.
Also in 16 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-audio
Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.
Also in 13 projects that use this
julianoczkowskiSkillbrief-to-tasks
Break a design brief into an ordered checklist of independently buildable tasks using vertical slices. Saves as a markdown checklist. Use when user wants to break down work, create tasks from a brief, plan implementation order, or mentions "tasks" or "breakdown".
Also in 7 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillasset-spec
Generate per-asset visual specifications and AI generation prompts from GDDs, level docs, or character profiles. Produces structured spec files and updates the master asset manifest. Run after art bible and GDD/level design are approved, before production begins.
Also in 10 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillcreate-control-manifest
After architecture is complete, produces a flat actionable rules sheet for programmers — what you must do, what you must never do, per system and per layer. Extracted from all Accepted ADRs, technical preferences, and engine reference docs. More immediately actionable than ADRs (which explain why).
Also in 10 projects that use this
- +4 more from CoralGame
- +3 more from lilangMax
Other versions155 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- DenchHQ/DenchClaw★ 1.7k100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 154
- garrytan/gstack★ 141ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- plugin87/ux-ui-agent-skills★ 3.1ksame name
- me2resh/apexyard★ 542same name
- julianoczkowski/designer-skills★ 536same name
- openclaw/openclaw-enterprise★ 454same name
- AndrewDryga/emisar★ 392same name
- TheDecipherist/claude-code-mastery-project-starter-kit★ 337same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- tsubotax/melta-ui★ 201same name
144 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/git-rules.mdcCursor rule
- agent-builderSkill
- data-builderSkill
- game-builderSkill
- platform-apiSkill
- app-builderSkill
- composio-appsSkill
- actionsSkill
- documentsSkill
- duckdb-operationsSkill
- object-builderSkill
- reportsSkill
- database-crm-systemSkill
- views-filtersSkill
- dench-integrationsSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- canarySkill
- carefulSkill
- design-consultationSkill
- document-releaseSkill
- freezeSkill
- guardSkill
- investigateSkill
- land-and-deploySkill
- office-hoursSkill
- plan-ceo-reviewSkill
- plan-design-reviewSkill
- plan-eng-reviewSkill
- qa-onlySkill
- qaSkill
- retroSkill
- reviewSkill
- shipSkill
- gstack-workflowSkill
- unfreezeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 128 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
Check for DESIGN.md — patterns blessed here are not flagged
- Distinctive: line 20
Read changed frontend files (full files, not just diff hunks)
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 128 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design Review — Audit and Fix
Same design audit methodology as plan-design-review, but applied to existing code. You find issues AND fix them.
Related skills: plan-design-review | design-consultation | review
Step 1: Context
- Check for DESIGN.md — patterns blessed here are not flagged
- Read changed frontend files (full files, not just diff hunks)
- Identify the design system in use (Tailwind, CSS modules, styled-components, etc.)
Step 2: Audit
Apply the same 8 dimensions from plan-design-review:
- Information Architecture
- Interaction Design
- Visual Hierarchy
- Consistency
- Accessibility
- Responsiveness
- Performance
- Delight
Plus AI Slop Detection — check for gratuitous gradients, card soup, icon overload.
Step 3: Fix
For each finding:
Mechanical CSS fixes → AUTO-FIX
outline: nonewithout alternative focus indicator → addfocus-visiblestyles!importantthat can be removed → increase specificity insteadfont-size < 16pxon mobile inputs → set to 16px to prevent iOS zoom- Missing
alton images → add descriptive alt text - Color contrast below WCAG AA → adjust colors
Design judgment needed → ASK
Present each with before/after description and let the user decide.
Step 4: Commit
Each fix gets its own atomic commit:
fix(design): add focus-visible indicators to interactive elements
fix(design): increase contrast ratio on secondary text
fix(a11y): add alt text to profile imagesStep 5: Scorecard
Output the same scorecard as plan-design-review showing before and after scores.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

