agentleFS
AdhamxonAdhamxon/claude-code-skills/.claude/skills/scope-creep-detector/SKILL.md

scope-creep-detector

Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyzes git diffs against a stated intent to detect scope creep, unrelated files, broad pull requests, changes that grew beyond a fix, dependency additions, public API renames, config or CI edits, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files. Use when the user asks whether a change grew beyond the fix, a PR is too broad, or what unrelated stuff they touched, and wants keep, split, or justify guidance. Operates locally and offline.

2 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

17 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈14

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before opening a pull request whose diff may have grown beyond its intent

    line 28
  2. Distinctive:

    When a bug fix touches unexpected files or subsystems

    line 29
  3. Distinctive:

    When the user asks whether staged changes are too broad

    line 30
  4. Distinctive:

    When a diff includes dependency, public API, config, CI, or build changes

    line 31
  5. Distinctive:

    When the user wants a concrete split plan for a mixed change

    line 32
  6. Very specific:

    Use the user's one-line intent when available.

    line 43
  7. Distinctive:

    If no intent was given, the script falls back to the current branch name.

    line 46
  8. Very specific:

    Run from this skill directory and point --repo at the target repository.

    line 52
  9. Very specific:

    Use --hunk-threshold only when the repository has a documented reason to change the default churn threshold.

    line 83
  10. Distinctive:

    Read references/scope-signals.md before making a recommendation.

    line 89
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep: when the path is necessary for the stated intent and the connection is direct.

    line 107
  12. Distinctive:

    Split: when it can land independently, belongs to another subsystem, or introduces a dependency, API rename, config edit, or large hunk …

    line 109
  13. Distinctive:

    Justify: when a cross-cutting edit cannot be separated safely.

    line 112
  14. Distinctive:

    Prefer split when evidence is ambiguous.

    line 115
  15. Distinctive:

    Use this compact structure:

    line 120
  16. Distinctive:

    Keep, split, or justify table

    line 126
  17. Distinctive:

    Ask before applying any split, revert, staging, or commit operation.

    line 131

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Scope Creep Detector

A one-line fix should not require a reviewer to reverse-engineer fourteen files across three subsystems. This skill compares a git diff with its stated intent, surfaces scope signals, and turns them into keep, split, or justify decisions.

Everything runs locally. The script makes no network calls and does not change the working tree, index, commits, or branches.

When to use

  • Before opening a pull request whose diff may have grown beyond its intent
  • When a bug fix touches unexpected files or subsystems
  • When the user asks whether staged changes are too broad
  • When a diff includes dependency, public API, config, CI, or build changes
  • When the user wants a concrete split plan for a mixed change

When not to use

  • Formatting code, running a linter, or writing a commit message
  • Reviewing correctness, security, or test quality inside an agreed scope
  • Measuring historical project growth across many commits
  • Editing or reverting files without the user's approval

Establish the intent

Use the user's one-line intent when available. Keep it concrete, such as fix null dereference in parser or add retry limit to webhook delivery.

If no intent was given, the script falls back to the current branch name. If that name is generic, detached, or unrelated to the work, ask for one line of intent before treating relatedness as meaningful.

Run the classifier

Run from this skill directory and point --repo at the target repository.

Working tree diff:

python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Staged diff:

python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --staged \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Branch diff against a merge base:

python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --repo /path/to/repo --base main \
  --intent "fix null dereference in parser" --json

Saved diff or stdin:

python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff change.diff --intent "parser fix" --json
git diff --staged | python3 scripts/scope_creep.py --diff - \
  --intent "parser fix" --json

Use --hunk-threshold only when the repository has a documented reason to change the default churn threshold. Do not tune the threshold merely to make a warning disappear.

Interpret the JSON

Read references/scope-signals.md before making a recommendation. Treat the classifier as triage evidence, not proof of authorial intent.

  • in_scope: file paths with at least one intent/path keyword overlap
  • likely_creep: paths without overlap, with the reason and detected signals
  • new_deps: dependencies introduced in supported manifest formats
  • api_renames: nearby removed and added public function or class declarations
  • config_edits: CI, container, build, YAML, and TOML changes
  • stats: churn, subsystem counts, oversized hunks, and formatting-only files

Empty arrays are evidence too. Say that no signal was detected, not that the diff is guaranteed to be in scope.

Recommend keep, split, or justify

Give every item in likely_creep one disposition:

  1. Keep when the path is necessary for the stated intent and the connection is direct. Explain the connection in one sentence.
  2. Split when it can land independently, belongs to another subsystem, or introduces a dependency, API rename, config edit, or large hunk that is not required for the intent. Name the files or hunks for the follow-up change.
  3. Justify when a cross-cutting edit cannot be separated safely. State the invariant or build constraint that requires it and call out reviewer risk.

Prefer split when evidence is ambiguous. Never claim that a zero overlap score proves a file is unrelated. Path vocabulary is a cheap, deterministic proxy.

Write the scope report

Use this compact structure:

  1. Intent and diff source
  2. Files and subsystems touched, with total additions and deletions
  3. In-scope changes
  4. Likely creep with signal evidence
  5. Keep, split, or justify table
  6. Proposed follow-up grouping, if any

Name file paths and hunk headers. For an oversized mixed hunk, explain that the script cannot split it automatically and describe the smallest coherent edit. Ask before applying any split, revert, staging, or commit operation.

Files

  • scripts/scope_creep.py: deterministic unified-diff parser and classifier
  • references/scope-signals.md: signal definitions, thresholds, and limits

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.