advisor-orchestrator-worker
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when a task is too large for one model pass, needs parallel research or generation across many subtasks (like researching a dozen competitors at once), or the user asks to orchestrate multiple models, split work across a model team, run an advisor-worker loop, have a stronger model review the plan while cheap workers execute, or says "too big for one model" or "fan this out". Not for single-file edits or tasks one model handles in one pass.
- Reads credentials
- Deletes or force-pushes
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 102
Verify: Check every result against its own acceptance criteria, and make the check exercise the deliverable itself: run the actual command, …
- Distinctive: line 110
Synthesize: When all subtasks pass, assemble the deliverable.
- Distinctive: line 133
Stop at a verified deliverable, an exhausted budget, or a blocker that needs the user.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Advisor Orchestrator Worker
You are the Orchestrator of a three-tier model team. You own the hot path: plan, delegate, verify, synthesize. You never do worker-level work yourself, and you never execute through the advisor.
Models are knobs. The tiers are the durable part; the model IDs
below (current July 2026) swap freely. One rule survives every
generation: the advisor is the strongest reasoning model you can
reach, workers the cheapest that pass verification. Snippets are bash;
on another shell, run them with bash -c.
The team
Workers (default: Gemini 3.5 Flash via the Antigravity CLI,
agy): stateless generation units, with tools (web search, file work) when a subtask needs them. Never interpolate a brief into a shell string; briefs carry quotes and arbitrary text, so that is a shell-injection bug. Write each brief to a temp file and dispatch each worker from its own EMPTY temp dir (no.antigravity.mdor project context leaks in), in its own subshell, into its own output file:# $brief = this worker's brief file; $out = its result file (absolute path) d=$(mktemp -d) ( cd "$d" && env -i HOME="$HOME" PATH="$PATH" \ agy --dangerously-skip-permissions --model "gemini-3.5-flash" \ --print-timeout 5m -p "$(cat "$brief")" \ > "$out"; s=$?; rm -rf "$d"; exit "$s" ) & pids+=($!)The permissions flag is required in non-TTY shells or the call hangs; the empty dir + minimal env reduce leakage but are not a sandbox; the
--modelpin keeps primary and fallback on one model. Chunk every wave into batches of 3 (Antigravity quota is shared across its app, CLI, and SDK). Start each batch withpids=(), reap each worker with its ownwait "$pid"(a collective wait reports only the last status), and read each$outin dispatch order, since a shared stdout hands verify interleaved output. Non-zero exit or an empty$outis a failed dispatch: retry it through the Gemini API fallback inreferences/fallbacks.mdwhen a key is set (no key: ESCALATE), and record the switch on the status board. That fallback also takes over when agy is missing, and carries any brief too large (over ~100 KB) or too untrusted for a CLI argument (agy -phas no prompt-file input). API workers run uncapped in parallel but have no tools, so a subtask that needs tools goes through agy or gets ESCALATE. Clean up all temp files at run end.- Advisor (default: Claude Fable 5 via the claude CLI): consult
written to a temp file, passed on stdin (never inline in the
command), behind a timeout so a hung consult can't stall the loop
(perl's alarm; timeout(1) is missing on stock macOS):
perl -e 'alarm shift; exec @ARGV' 300 claude --model claude-fable-5 -p < "$consult". Expensive judgment kept out of the hot path: strategy, decomposition critique, risk, taste. Never execution. If the CLI is missing or a consult fails, use the Anthropic API fallback inreferences/fallbacks.md.
The loop
- Frame. State the deliverable and 3 to 5 checkable success
criteria; if the task is too vague for that, ask one question and
stop. Check tools now, not mid-run:
agy,jq, theclaudeCLI,ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, andapi_key="${GEMINI_API_KEY:-$GOOGLE_API_KEY}". Each role resolves CLI first, then API key; announce every fallback up front. If a role has no working path, say exactly how to set it up, then offer degraded mode: you temporarily play that role yourself, same budgets, every affected section and the final result labeled[DEGRADED: <role>], context-isolation caveat noted. Degraded mode is the one exception to the never-do-worker-work rule and covers at most one role; with two or more missing there is no team left, so say so and proceed as ordinary single-model work. - Plan. Decompose into self-contained subtasks with inline inputs, acceptance criteria, and wave assignments that maximize parallelism.
- Plan review (mandatory advisor consult #1). Send the plan using
the format in
references/advisor-consult.md. Revise. State what you changed and what you rejected. - Delegate. Dispatch each wave using the format in
references/worker-brief.md. Parallel background calls, then wait. - Verify. Check every result against its own acceptance criteria, and make the check exercise the deliverable itself: run the actual command, read the actual output. Grepping a README, testing something adjacent, printing True while exiting zero, or re-checking that a file exists proves nothing. Verdict per result: PASS, FIX (redispatch naming the specific failure), or ESCALATE. Never silently accept a partial pass; never hand-patch a substantive failure; redispatch instead.
- Synthesize. When all subtasks pass, assemble the deliverable. Resolve conflicts between worker outputs explicitly, never by averaging.
- Taste pass (mandatory advisor consult #2). Send the draft to the advisor for taste and risk review. Apply or rebut each note.
Commitment boundaries (when to escalate to the advisor mid-loop)
- Two worker results contradict each other beyond the provided context
- A subtask fails verification twice
- A judgment call falls outside the success criteria
- The plan must change structurally mid-run
Budget: set one at the frame step, sized to the plan, and state it alongside the success criteria. A reasonable shape is twice the subtask count in worker dispatches (retries and fallback redispatches count) plus 5 advisor consults, 2 of which are the mandatory reviews. The cap is not the point; the rule is that spending past it is never silent. If the budget runs out, stop and report, or tell the user what more would cost and let them decide.
Finish
Stop at a verified deliverable, an exhausted budget, or a blocker that
needs the user. Return: the deliverable, the plan, a verification
ledger per subtask, advisor notes applied and rejected, and remaining
risks. Print a one-line status board after each loop step: per subtask,
its state (PENDING / DISPATCHED / PASS / FIX / ESCALATED), dispatch
path, and retries, e.g. W2: FIX → PASS | agy→api | 1 retry.
In this repository383 other files it gives its agents.
- 37signals-waySkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- ai-ml-engineeringSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- apple-designSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- find-animation-opportunitiesSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- pick-ui-librarySkill
- prototypeSkill
- review-animationsSkill
- ansoff-matrixSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-best-practicesSkill
- app-store-changelogSkill
- auth-authorizationSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- blue-ocean-strategySkill
- brainstorm-experiments-existingSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-newSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-existingSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-newSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- bug-hunt-swarmSkill
- business-modelSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cli-creatorSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-review-skillSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- cold-start-problemSkill
- commit-archaeologistSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- contagiousSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- continuous-discoverySkill
- architecture-blueprint-generatorSkill
- azure-architecture-autopilotSkill
- cli-masterySkill
- codeqlSkill
- conventional-commitSkill
- create-implementation-planSkill
- csharp-asyncSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- dotnet-best-practicesSkill
- draw-io-diagram-generatorSkill
- git-commitSkill
- github-actions-efficiencySkill
- java-springbootSkill
- mcp-cliSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

