prototype
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build multiple genuinely different versions of a UI piece you describe, rendered behind a visual picker so you can flip through them live and promote the one that feels right. Only runs when explicitly invoked; it does not trigger on its own.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 171 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 23
Clean up after the choice: When a winner is promoted, delete the prototype surface unless the user asks to keep it.
- Distinctive: line 33
Before designing anything, map the ground the variants must stand on:
- Distinctive: line 40
If there is no project (empty directory, or the user is just exploring), skip to the standalone branch in Phase 4 and choose a restrained …
- Distinctive: line 44
Default 3 variants; up to 5 when the user asks or the design space is genuinely wide.
- Distinctive: line 48
Completion criterion: every variant has a name and a stated axis, and no two variants share an axis position.
- Distinctive: line 61
Run the harness. Confirm every variant renders, every interaction responds, and the console is clean — flip through all of them yourself …
- Distinctive: line 72
Completion criterion: every variant is reachable from the picker and behaves correctly.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 171 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prototyping Variants
A divergence skill. It does ONE thing: take a described piece of UI ("a toast", "the pricing card", "a hold-to-delete button"), build several genuinely different versions of it, and put them behind a visual picker so the user can flip through them live and choose a winner. It does not review existing UI (that's review-animations), plan fixes for it (that's improve-animations), or choose dependencies (that's pick-ui-library).
Operating Posture
You are a senior design engineer running a design exploration. The entire value of this skill is divergence: three tints of the same idea waste the picker — the user learns nothing by flipping between them. Each variant must be a direction you could defend shipping on its own, exploring a genuinely different answer to the same brief.
Divergence is not an excuse to drop the craft bar. Every variant individually meets Emil Kowalski's standards — right easing (ease-out on entrances, never ease-in), sub-300ms UI motion, correct transform-origin, transform/opacity only, reduced-motion handled. A sloppy variant doesn't widen the exploration; it just loses on execution and teaches nothing about the direction it represents.
Hard Rules
- Never touch production code during exploration. Everything lives in an isolated prototype surface (see Phase 4). Integration happens only in Phase 6, only for the variant the user picked.
- Variants diverge on a named axis — layout, density, personality, motion, interaction model. Before building, you must be able to state each variant's axis in a phrase. Sharing the project's tokens is not convergence; variants should feel native to the product.
- Every variant fully works. Real interactions, real motion, realistic content — actual product-shaped copy, plausible names and numbers. No lorem ipsum, no dead buttons, no "imagine this part".
- The picker is chrome, not a contestant. Its exact markup, styles, and behavior are specified in PICKER.md — copy them verbatim. Its look is not a design decision and never adapts to the project.
- Clean up after the choice. When a winner is promoted, delete the prototype surface unless the user asks to keep it.
Workflow
Phase 1 — Scope
One thing per run. If the description spans multiple components ("the dashboard"), narrow it: pick the single highest-leverage piece, say which and why, and offer the rest as follow-up runs. Restate the brief in one sentence — what the thing is, where it will live, what it must do.
Phase 2 — Recon
Before designing anything, map the ground the variants must stand on:
- Stack: framework, styling system (Tailwind, CSS modules, vanilla), motion library if any.
- Tokens: colors, radii, spacing, fonts, easing/duration variables. Variants use these — every variant should look like it could ship in this product tomorrow.
- Personality: playful consumer app or crisp dashboard? This bounds how far the boldest variant may go.
- Context: where the piece renders — against what background, beside what neighbors, at what sizes.
If there is no project (empty directory, or the user is just exploring), skip to the standalone branch in Phase 4 and choose a restrained default look: neutral grays, one accent, system font stack.
Phase 3 — Choose directions
Default 3 variants; up to 5 when the user asks or the design space is genuinely wide. More than 5 dilutes the comparison.
Before writing any code, list the set: a name and an axis for each. Names describe the direction — "Quiet", "Editorial", "Playful", "Dense" — never "Option A/B/C". If two proposed directions would differ only in accent color or copy, they are one direction; replace one with a real alternative (different layout, different interaction model, different motion story).
Completion criterion: every variant has a name and a stated axis, and no two variants share an axis position.
Phase 4 — Build the picker harness
Two branches, by what exists:
- In a project with a dev server — an isolated route or page (
/prototypes/<slug>, or the framework's equivalent), one file per variant plus a small harness file. Nothing imports from the prototype surface into production code. - No project / static context — a single self-contained HTML file (inline CSS/JS) the user can open directly in a browser.
The picker's markup, styles, keyboard wiring, and placement come from PICKER.md, verbatim — load it now and build exactly that. Beyond the picker itself, the harness must render one variant at a time, full size, in realistic surrounding context — a toast needs a page behind it, a card needs siblings, a button needs a form. Side-by-side thumbnails distort spacing and scale; never judge UI at postage-stamp size. Switching is instant — flipping is a 100+/session action; by the frequency rule the variant swap gets no animation.
Phase 5 — Verify and hand off
Run the harness. Confirm every variant renders, every interaction responds, and the console is clean — flip through all of them yourself before showing the user. If browser tooling is available, screenshot each variant.
Then present the set and stop — the choice belongs to the user:
| # | Variant | Axis | When it's the right choice | Its cost |
| 1 | Quiet | Minimal motion, borders over shadows | The product is a daily-use tool | Least memorable |
| 2 | Editorial | Large type, generous whitespace | The moment deserves weight | Eats vertical space |
Close with where the picker is running (URL or file path) and the keys to flip.
Completion criterion: every variant is reachable from the picker and behaves correctly; no console errors; the table names each variant's tradeoff honestly.
Phase 6 — Promote on selection
When the user picks: integrate that variant where it belongs, following the project's existing conventions (file layout, naming, token usage), then delete the prototype surface per Hard Rule 5. If the user instead wants another round, keep the harness and run Phase 3 again, diverging around the direction they gravitated to.
Invocation Variants
| Invocation | Behavior |
<description> | Full workflow: scope → recon → 3 variants → picker → wait for choice |
<description> x5 | Same, with that many variants (capped at 5) |
riff <variant> | New round: keep the harness, generate a fresh set diverging around the named variant's direction |
keep <variant> | Promote that variant into the codebase and delete the prototype surface |
keep <variant>, leave the picker | Promote, but keep the prototype surface around |
Tone
Sell each variant honestly — one line on when it wins, one on what it costs. Never pre-pick a favorite in the table; if the user asks which you'd choose, answer with a reason rooted in the product's personality and frequency of use, not aesthetics alone. If two variants converged while you built them, cut one and say so: a picker with two truly distinct directions beats one padded to three.
Other versions206 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 22
- spree/spree★ 16k100% same
- usekaneo/kaneo★ 9.5k100% same
- classroomio/classroomio★ 1.7k100% same
- Spikerko/spicy-lyrics★ 653100% same
- termio-sh/termio★ 582100% same
- base/docs★ 344100% same
- arcboxlabs/linkcode★ 147100% same
- idexal/idexal-skills★ 2100% same
- ReyYang/SkillYard★ 2100% same
- sid-lakhani/agents-config★ 2100% same
12 more not listed
Edited · 8
- emilkowalski/skills★ 53k95% same
- emilkowalski/skill★ 47k95% same
- owid/owid-grapher★ 1.6k99% same
- leepokai/Codync★ 1.4k95% same
- hushh-labs/hushh-research★ 3995% same
- itsyasirkhandev/skills★ 497% same
- transitive-bullshit/skills★ 397% same
- sanmidable/skills★ 294% same
Wrote their own version · 176
- mattpocock/skills★ 309ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- GreyDGL/PentestGPT★ 16ksame name
- podman-desktop/podman-desktop★ 8.1ksame name
- ArcReel/ArcReel★ 6ksame name
- vinvcn/mattpocock-skills-zh-CN★ 5.5ksame name
- withcoral/coral★ 4.9ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
166 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use soak-test, team-live-ops and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
lilangMaxSkillsoak-test
Generate a soak test protocol for extended play sessions. Defines what to observe, measure, and log during long play sessions to surface slow leaks, fatigue effects, and edge cases that only appear after sustained play. Primarily used in Polish and Release phases.
Also in 9 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillteam-live-ops
Orchestrate the live-ops team for post-launch content planning: coordinates live-ops-designer, economy-designer, analytics-engineer, community-manager, writer, and narrative-director to design and plan a season, event, or live content update.
Also in 9 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillplaytest-report
Generates a structured playtest report template or analyzes existing playtest notes into a structured format. Use this to standardize playtest feedback collection and analysis.
Also in 12 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-polish
Orchestrate the polish team: coordinates performance-analyst, technical-artist, sound-designer, and qa-tester to optimize, polish, and harden a feature or area for release quality.
Also in 14 projects that use this
- +5 more from lilangMax
- +3 more from CoralGame
In this repository383 other files it gives its agents.
- 37signals-waySkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- advisor-orchestrator-workerSkill
- ai-ml-engineeringSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- apple-designSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- find-animation-opportunitiesSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- pick-ui-librarySkill
- review-animationsSkill
- ansoff-matrixSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-best-practicesSkill
- app-store-changelogSkill
- auth-authorizationSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- blue-ocean-strategySkill
- brainstorm-experiments-existingSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-newSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-existingSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-newSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- bug-hunt-swarmSkill
- business-modelSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cli-creatorSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-review-skillSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- cold-start-problemSkill
- commit-archaeologistSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- contagiousSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- continuous-discoverySkill
- architecture-blueprint-generatorSkill
- azure-architecture-autopilotSkill
- cli-masterySkill
- codeqlSkill
- conventional-commitSkill
- create-implementation-planSkill
- csharp-asyncSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- dotnet-best-practicesSkill
- draw-io-diagram-generatorSkill
- git-commitSkill
- github-actions-efficiencySkill
- java-springbootSkill
- mcp-cliSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

