opportunity-solution-tree
Skill2 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Build an Opportunity Solution Tree (OST) to structure product discovery — map a desired outcome to opportunities, solutions, and experiments. Based on Teresa Torres' Continuous Discovery Habits. Use when structuring discovery work, mapping opportunities to solutions, or deciding what to build next.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 15 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 26
One outcome at a time: Don't try to solve everything.
- Distinctive: line 28
Compare and contrast: Always generate at least 3 solutions per opportunity before choosing.
- Distinctive: line 30
Continuous, not periodic: Update the tree weekly as you learn from interviews, analytics, and experiments.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 15 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Opportunity Solution Tree (OST)
A visual framework for structuring continuous product discovery. Connects a desired outcome to customer opportunities, possible solutions, and experiments to validate them.
Domain Context
The Opportunity Solution Tree (Teresa Torres, Continuous Discovery Habits) is the backbone of modern product discovery. It prevents teams from jumping to solutions by forcing them to first map the opportunity space.
Structure (4 levels):
- Desired Outcome (top) — The measurable business or product outcome the team is pursuing. Should be a single, clear metric (e.g., "increase 7-day retention to 40%"). This comes from your OKRs or product strategy.
- Opportunities (second level) — Customer needs, pain points, or desires discovered through research. These are problems worth solving — not features. Frame them from the customer's perspective: "I struggle to..." or "I wish I could..." Prioritize using Opportunity Score: Importance × (1 − Satisfaction) (Dan Olsen, The Lean Product Playbook). Normalize Importance and Satisfaction to 0–1.
- Solutions (third level) — Possible ways to address each opportunity. Generate multiple solutions per opportunity — don't commit to the first idea. The Product Trio (PM + Designer + Engineer) should ideate together. "Best ideas often come from engineers."
- Experiments (bottom) — Fast, cheap tests to validate whether a solution actually addresses the opportunity. Use assumption testing (Value, Usability, Viability, Feasibility risks). Prefer experiments with "skin-in-the-game" (Alberto Savoia) over opinion-based validation.
Key principles:
- One outcome at a time. Don't try to solve everything. Focus the tree on a single desired outcome.
- Opportunities, not features. "Never allow customers to design solutions. Prioritize opportunities (problems), not features."
- Compare and contrast. Always generate at least 3 solutions per opportunity before choosing. Avoid the "first idea" trap.
- Discovery is not linear. Loop back if experiments fail. Kill solutions that don't validate. Explore new branches.
- Continuous, not periodic. Update the tree weekly as you learn from interviews, analytics, and experiments.
Instructions
You are helping a product team build an Opportunity Solution Tree for $ARGUMENTS.
Input Requirements
- A desired outcome or business metric to improve
- Customer research data (interviews, surveys, analytics, feedback)
- Optionally: existing opportunities or solution ideas to organize
Process
- Define the desired outcome — Confirm or help articulate a single, measurable outcome at the top of the tree.
- Map opportunities — From provided research, identify 3-7 customer opportunities (needs/pains). Group related opportunities. Frame each from the customer's perspective.
- Prioritize opportunities — Use Opportunity Score or qualitative assessment to rank. Focus on the top 2-3.
- Generate solutions — For each prioritized opportunity, brainstorm 3+ solutions from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives.
- Design experiments — For the most promising solutions, suggest 1-2 fast experiments. Specify: hypothesis, method, metric, success threshold.
- Visualize the tree — Present the full OST in a clear hierarchical format.
Think step by step. Save as markdown if substantial.
Further Reading
Other versions22 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2100% same
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1100% same
- miovrag/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- xeroc/skills★ 1100% same
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- stefanomartiradonna/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 1
- aleksander-dytko/ai-pm-workspace★ 3489% same
Wrote their own version · 15
- deanpeters/Product-Manager-Skills★ 7.7ksame name
- itseffi/agentic-os★ 114same name
- avelikiy/great_cto★ 113same name
- drvoss/everything-copilot-cli★ 49same name
- DIAL-Studio/pm-agent-harness-kit★ 12same name
- The-Utopia-Studio/skills★ 6same name
- agrivisionai/claude-skills★ 1same name
- luisabwk/kraken★ 1same name
- nandanosql/all_in_one_pm_skills★ 1same name
- varunk130/claude-code-skills★ 1same name
5 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use prioritization-advisor and business-health-diagnostic.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
nandanosqlSkillprioritization-advisor
Guide PMs in choosing the right prioritization framework — RICE, ICE, Kano, MoSCoW, Value vs Effort, Cost of Delay — by asking adaptive questions about product stage, team context, and data availability.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nandanosqlSkillbusiness-health-diagnostic
Run a comprehensive business health check across revenue, unit economics, product metrics, and market position — identifying strengths, weaknesses, and the single most important metric to fix.
Also in 4 projects that use this
In this repository383 other files it gives its agents.
- 37signals-waySkill
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- advisor-orchestrator-workerSkill
- ai-ml-engineeringSkill
- algorithmic-artSkill
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- animation-vocabularySkill
- apple-designSkill
- emil-design-engSkill
- find-animation-opportunitiesSkill
- improve-animationsSkill
- pick-ui-librarySkill
- prototypeSkill
- review-animationsSkill
- ansoff-matrixSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- api-design-best-practicesSkill
- app-store-changelogSkill
- auth-authorizationSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- blue-ocean-strategySkill
- brainstorm-experiments-existingSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-newSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-existingSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-newSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- bug-hunt-swarmSkill
- business-modelSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- claude-apiSkill
- clean-architectureSkill
- clean-codeSkill
- cli-creatorSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-review-skillSkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- cold-start-problemSkill
- commit-archaeologistSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- competitor-analysisSkill
- contagiousSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- continuous-discoverySkill
- architecture-blueprint-generatorSkill
- azure-architecture-autopilotSkill
- cli-masterySkill
- codeqlSkill
- conventional-commitSkill
- create-implementation-planSkill
- csharp-asyncSkill
- diagnoseSkill
- dotnet-best-practicesSkill
- draw-io-diagram-generatorSkill
- git-commitSkill
- github-actions-efficiencySkill
- java-springbootSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

