using-agent-skills
Skill2 starsChanged 21 days agoMITView on GitHub
Helps choose among the installed agent Skills without replacing their native description-based discovery. Use when the user explicitly asks which Skill to use, requests an overview of the catalog, or several Skill descriptions remain equally applicable. Do not invoke merely because a session started.
49 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- celestialdust/achilles-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- steven123397/nexuskit-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- lza6/claw-code-tingfengtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jaskirat1616/grok-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- elvladislavo/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use constraint-driven-development and doubt-driven-development.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
MrCipherSmithSkillconstraint-driven-development
Use when a project needs a persistent, measurable quality bar — starting a project without documented standards, 'set up constraints', or when coverage/perf/a11y thresholds get re-debated per-PR. Produces CONSTRAINTS.md with enforceable numbers, ratchets, and a guard against silent weakening. NOT for throwaway prototypes or a one-off CI setup.
Also in 15 projects that use this
seikaikyoSkilldoubt-driven-development
對非平凡決策啟動新鮮 context 對抗審查(找碴不背書),在修正還便宜的時候抓出錯誤方向。適用:高風險改動(production、資安敏感邏輯、不可逆操作)、不熟的程式碼、要宣稱「這樣是安全的 / 可行的」之前。機械性操作與一行修改不適用。
Also in 38 projects that use this
Other versions49 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 49
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114ksame name
- kdlbs/kandev★ 1.1ksame name
- shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp★ 174same name
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 46same name
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 33same name
- sampleXbro/agentsmesh★ 27same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 6same name
- lza6/claw-code-tingfeng★ 5same name
- dzevs/zynk★ 4same name
39 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository100 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- ansoff-matrixSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-existingSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-newSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-existingSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-newSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- business-modelSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- customer-journey-mapSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- define-hypothesisSkill
- define-jtbd-canvasSkill
- define-opportunity-treeSkill
- define-problem-statementSkill
- deliver-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- deliver-edge-casesSkill
- deliver-prdSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- develop-solution-briefSkill
- discover-competitive-analysisSkill
- discover-interview-synthesisSkill
- discover-market-sizingSkill
- document-architectureSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- draft-ndaSkill
- dummy-datasetSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- growth-loopsSkill
- gtm-motionsSkill
- gtm-strategySkill
- ideal-customer-profileSkill
- identify-assumptions-existingSkill
- identify-assumptions-newSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- intended-vs-implementedSkill
- interview-meSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- job-storiesSkill
- lean-canvasSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- market-segmentsSkill
- measure-experiment-designSkill
- metrics-dashboardSkill
- modern-web-guidanceSkill
- monetization-strategySkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 44 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Read the available Skill names and descriptions supplied by the agent.
- Distinctive: line 18
Prefer the Skill that produces the exact requested artifact.
- Distinctive: line 19
Use multiple Skills only when their outputs are sequential dependencies.
- Distinctive: line 20
Never invent or invoke a Skill name that is not installed.
- Distinctive: line 37
When a more specific installed Skill matches the requested named artifact or framework, prefer it over a broad workflow Skill.
- Distinctive: line 53
When the user asks which Skill applies, return:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 44 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Using Agent Skills
Choose the smallest set of installed Skills that owns the requested outcome.
Use native discovery first
Codex and Claude Code discover each Skill from the name and description in
that Skill's SKILL.md. This Skill is optional guidance, not a required root
manifest and not a dispatcher that must run before other Skills.
- Read the available Skill names and descriptions supplied by the agent.
- Match the user's requested outcome and current lifecycle stage.
- Prefer the Skill that produces the exact requested artifact.
- Use multiple Skills only when their outputs are sequential dependencies.
- Never invent or invoke a Skill name that is not installed.
Resolve common overlaps
| Need | Primary Skill | Boundary |
| Clarify an ambiguous request | interview-me | Use brainstorming after the problem is understood and options are needed. |
| Explore solution options | brainstorming | Use spec-driven-development once the implementation behavior is ready to define. |
| Define implementation behavior | spec-driven-development | Use planning-and-task-breakdown only after the specification is stable. |
| Break implementation into steps | planning-and-task-breakdown | It does not own product requirements or formal system documents. |
| Create a product requirements document | deliver-prd | Use document-architecture for formal requirements, specifications, designs, and proposals. |
| Create a formal system document | document-architecture | It routes to one document type and keeps Markdown canonical unless Word is requested. |
| Record an architecture decision | documentation-and-adrs | An ADR records why a decision was made; a technical specification records the selected design. |
| Implement a change | incremental-implementation | Combine with test-driven-development when behavior changes. |
| Review before merge | code-review-and-quality | Add security or performance review only when those risks are present. |
| Prepare a release | shipping-and-launch | Use release-notes only for the user-facing change summary. |
When a more specific installed Skill matches the requested named artifact or framework, prefer it over a broad workflow Skill.
Sequence dependent Skills
A typical implementation can use:
spec-driven-development → planning-and-task-breakdown →
incremental-implementation + test-driven-development →
code-review-and-quality → shipping-and-launch
This is an example, not a mandatory pipeline. Skip any stage whose owned artifact or verification is already complete.
Report the choice
When the user asks which Skill applies, return:
- the selected Skill or ordered set;
- the outcome each one owns;
- why nearby Skills were not selected;
- any required input that is still missing.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

