agentleFS
yuusakuriyuusakuri/agent-skills/skills/deliver-edge-cases/SKILL.md

deliver-edge-cases

Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Documents edge cases, error states, boundary conditions, race conditions, and recovery paths for a feature - the systematic catalog of what can go wrong and the failure modes to design for. Use during specification to map the failure surface and ensure comprehensive coverage, or during QA planning to identify boundary and limit scenarios to test. Distinct from deliver-acceptance-criteria, which writes story-level Given/When/Then checks; this skill produces the whole-feature edge-case catalog.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

9 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When you need to enumerate failure modes, race conditions, timeouts, and boundary or limit scenarios - everything that can go wrong - and …

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    When preparing QA test plans

    line 22
  3. Distinctive:

    After discovering production bugs to prevent similar issues

    line 23
  4. Distinctive:

    When reviewing PRDs or user stories for completeness

    line 24
  5. Distinctive:

    Before launch to ensure error states have been designed

    line 25
  6. Distinctive:

    When asked to document edge cases, follow these steps:

    line 36
  7. Distinctive:

    Consider every user input: What if it's empty?

    line 42
  8. Distinctive:

    Not all edge cases need the same attention.

    line 57
  9. Very specific:

    Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Edge Cases

An edge cases document systematically catalogs the unusual, boundary, and error scenarios for a feature. While happy-path flows are typically well-specified, edge cases often get discovered in production - causing bugs, poor user experience, and support burden. Documenting edge cases upfront ensures engineering handles them intentionally and QA knows what to test.

When to Use

  • When you need to enumerate failure modes, race conditions, timeouts, and boundary or limit scenarios - everything that can go wrong - and define a recovery path for each
  • During feature specification before engineering begins
  • When preparing QA test plans
  • After discovering production bugs to prevent similar issues
  • When reviewing PRDs or user stories for completeness
  • Before launch to ensure error states have been designed

When NOT to Use

  • You need story-scoped Given/When/Then checks for handoff -> use deliver-acceptance-criteria; this skill catalogs the whole feature's failure surface
  • The feature is not specified enough to enumerate inputs, states, and limits -> use deliver-prd first
  • A production incident already happened and you want the learning banked -> use retro, then update this catalog with the new case
  • You need readiness coordination for a launch, not failure analysis -> use shipping-and-launch

Instructions

When asked to document edge cases, follow these steps:

  1. Define the Feature Scope Clearly describe what feature or flow you're analyzing. Edge cases are specific to context - the same input might be valid in one feature and invalid in another.
  2. Walk Through Input Validation Consider every user input: What if it's empty? Too long? Wrong format? Contains special characters? What are the minimum and maximum valid values?
  3. Explore Boundary Conditions Find the edges of acceptable ranges. If a field accepts 1-100, test 0, 1, 100, and 101. Consider pagination boundaries, timeout thresholds, and rate limits.
  4. Map Error States Identify what can go wrong: network failures, permission denied, resource not found, concurrent modifications, expired sessions. Document both the scenario and expected behavior.
  5. Consider Concurrency Issues What if two users act simultaneously? What if the user double-clicks? What if data changes between load and save? Race conditions often cause subtle bugs.
  6. Define Recovery Paths For each error, specify how users recover. What message do they see? Can they retry? Is data preserved? Good error handling turns frustration into confidence.
  7. Prioritize by Likelihood and Impact Not all edge cases need the same attention. High-likelihood + high-impact cases need robust handling; rare + low-impact cases might just need graceful failure.

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete edge-case catalog fills every template section: Feature Overview; Edge Case Categories; Error Messages; Recovery Paths; and Test Scenarios.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • All user inputs have validation edge cases documented
  • Boundary conditions are explicitly listed
  • Network/system failure scenarios are covered
  • Each error state has a defined user-facing message
  • Recovery paths are specified (not just error detection)
  • Edge cases are prioritized by likelihood and impact

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.