outcome-roadmap
Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Transform an output-focused roadmap into an outcome-focused one that communicates strategic intent. Rewrites initiatives as outcome statements reflecting user and business impacts. Use when shifting to outcome roadmaps, making a roadmap more strategic, or rewriting feature lists as outcomes.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Gather Information: If the user provides a current roadmap, read it carefully.
- Distinctive: line 30
Rewrite as Outcome Statement: Use this format:
- Very specific: line 53
Save the Output: If substantial, save as a markdown document: Outcome-Roadmap-[year].md
- Distinctive: line 60
If unsure what outcome a feature drives, ask: "So what?" until you reach real customer/business value
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Transform Roadmap to Outcome-Focused Format
Purpose
You are an experienced product manager helping $ARGUMENTS shift from output-focused roadmaps (which emphasize features) to outcome-focused roadmaps (which emphasize customer and business impact). This skill rewrites initiatives as outcome statements that inspire and measure what matters.
Context
Output-focused roadmaps create false precision and misalign teams around features rather than results. Outcome-focused roadmaps clarify the customer problems being solved and the business value expected, enabling flexible execution and strategic thinking.
Instructions
- Gather Information: If the user provides a current roadmap, read it carefully. If they mention strategy documents or company objectives, use web search to understand how the roadmap should align with broader goals.
- Think Step by Step:
- For each initiative, ask: "What outcome are we trying to achieve?"
- What customer problem are we solving?
- What business metric will improve?
- How will this impact the customer experience or business?
- Is there a better, different way to achieve the same outcome?
- Transformation Process: For each initiative on the roadmap:
- Identify the Output: What feature or project is planned?
- Uncover the Outcome: Why are we building it? What changes for customers or business?
- Rewrite as Outcome Statement: Use this format:
Enable [customer segment] to [desired customer outcome] so that [business impact]
- Example Transformation:
- Output (Old): Q2: Build advanced search filters, implement AI recommendations, redesign dashboard
- Outcome (New):
- Q2: Enable customers to find products 50% faster through intuitive discovery
- Q2: Increase average order value by 20% through personalized AI recommendations
- Q2: Help operators monitor all systems with 80% reduction in dashboard load time
- Structure Output: Present the transformed roadmap with:
- Original initiatives listed by quarter/phase
- Outcome statements for each initiative
- Key metrics that will indicate success
- Dependencies or sequencing notes
- Include Strategic Context: For the overall roadmap, add:
- How outcomes align with company strategy
- Key assumptions about customer needs
- Flexible release windows (quarters, not specific dates)
- Save the Output: If substantial, save as a markdown document:
Outcome-Roadmap-[year].md
Notes
- An outcome should be testable and measurable
- Multiple outputs may achieve one outcome; focus on the outcome, not the feature list
- Outcome roadmaps are more resilient to change—embrace flexibility
- If unsure what outcome a feature drives, ask: "So what?" until you reach real customer/business value
Further Reading
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 6
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2100% same
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2100% same
- daviszhen/agent-skills★ 1100% same
- miovrag/claude-skills★ 1100% same
- maeng777/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- stefanomartiradonna/claude-skills★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- avelikiy/great_cto★ 113same name
- Usermuse/em-plugin★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository100 other files it gives its agents.
- ab-test-analysisSkill
- analyze-feature-requestsSkill
- ansoff-matrixSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- beachhead-segmentSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-existingSkill
- brainstorm-experiments-newSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-existingSkill
- brainstorm-ideas-newSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brainstorm-okrsSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- business-modelSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- cohort-analysisSkill
- competitive-battlecardSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- customer-journey-mapSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- define-hypothesisSkill
- define-jtbd-canvasSkill
- define-opportunity-treeSkill
- define-problem-statementSkill
- deliver-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- deliver-edge-casesSkill
- deliver-prdSkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- develop-solution-briefSkill
- discover-competitive-analysisSkill
- discover-interview-synthesisSkill
- discover-market-sizingSkill
- document-architectureSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- draft-ndaSkill
- dummy-datasetSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- grammar-checkSkill
- growth-loopsSkill
- gtm-motionsSkill
- gtm-strategySkill
- ideal-customer-profileSkill
- identify-assumptions-existingSkill
- identify-assumptions-newSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- intended-vs-implementedSkill
- interview-meSkill
- interview-scriptSkill
- job-storiesSkill
- lean-canvasSkill
- marketing-ideasSkill
- market-segmentsSkill
- measure-experiment-designSkill
- metrics-dashboardSkill
- modern-web-guidanceSkill
- monetization-strategySkill
- north-star-metricSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

