agentleFS
yuusakuriyuusakuri/agent-skills/skills/define-hypothesis/SKILL.md

define-hypothesis

Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Defines a testable hypothesis with clear success metrics and a validation approach. Use when forming assumptions to test or aligning a team on what success looks like, before any experiment is designed. To design the A/B test or experiment that will validate the hypothesis, use measure-experiment-design.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈6

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    After problem framing, before committing to a solution

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    When designing experiments or A/B tests

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    When team members have differing assumptions about user behavior

    line 22
  4. Distinctive:

    Before investing significant engineering resources in a feature

    line 23
  5. Distinctive:

    When pivoting direction and need to validate the new approach

    line 24
  6. Distinctive:

    When asked to create a hypothesis, follow these steps:

    line 35
  7. Very specific:

    Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.

    line 57

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->

Hypothesis

A hypothesis is a testable prediction about how a change will affect user behavior or business outcomes. It transforms assumptions into explicit statements that can be validated or invalidated through experimentation. Well-formed hypotheses prevent teams from building features based on untested beliefs and create shared understanding of what success looks like.

When to Use

  • After problem framing, before committing to a solution
  • When designing experiments or A/B tests
  • When team members have differing assumptions about user behavior
  • Before investing significant engineering resources in a feature
  • When pivoting direction and need to validate the new approach

When NOT to Use

  • You are ready to design the actual A/B test (variants, sample size, duration) -> use measure-experiment-design; this skill frames what to test, not how
  • The problem itself is still unframed -> use define-problem-statement first
  • You want to organize many assumptions and ideas into a discovery structure -> use define-opportunity-tree
  • The team needs the full business-model picture, not one testable claim -> use lean-canvas

Instructions

When asked to create a hypothesis, follow these steps:

  1. State the Belief Articulate what you believe will happen. Use the structured format: "We believe that [action/change] for [target user] will [expected outcome]." Be specific about the intervention - vague hypotheses can't be tested.
  2. Identify the Target User Define who this hypothesis applies to. A hypothesis about "users" is too broad. Specify the segment: new users in their first week, power users with 10+ sessions, churned users returning, etc.
  3. Define the Expected Outcome What behavior change or result do you expect? Frame it in terms of user actions (complete onboarding, make a purchase, return within 7 days) rather than internal metrics when possible.
  4. Set Success Metrics Choose a primary metric that directly measures the expected outcome. Include secondary metrics that provide context and guardrail metrics that ensure you're not causing harm elsewhere.
  5. Describe Validation Approach How will you test this hypothesis? A/B test, user interviews, prototype testing, cohort analysis? Be specific about sample size, duration, and statistical requirements.
  6. Document Risks and Assumptions What could invalidate this hypothesis beyond the test results? What are you assuming to be true that you haven't validated?

Output Format

Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete hypothesis document fills every template section: Hypothesis Statement; Background & Rationale; Target User Segment; Success Metrics; Validation Approach; Risks & Assumptions; and Timeline.

Quality Checklist

Before finalizing, verify:

  • Hypothesis is falsifiable (possible to prove wrong)
  • Success metric has a specific numeric target
  • Target user segment is clearly defined
  • Validation approach is practical and time-bound
  • Pass/fail criteria are unambiguous
  • Hypothesis doesn't assume the solution works

Examples

See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.