paper-analyzer
Skill302 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
学术论文结构化阅读、拆解与分析工具。基于12个阅读要素(研究背景、研究问题、研究结论、文献综合、文献批评、研究方法、理论视角与理论框架、一致性发现、不一致性发现、研究贡献、研究不足、未来研究展望)对论文进行深度拆解,结果保存为Excel文件。当用户提到需要针对论文/文献/paper进行拆解、解析、分析、阅读、梳理,并上传或告知一篇或多篇论文的本地文件路径(PDF、Word等)时触发此skill。
8 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenLAIR/dr-clawtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Boom5426/Nature-Paper-Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- JavaLyHn/paper-analyzertheir own version, first seen May 23, 2026
- zsyggg/paper-craft-skillstheir own version, first seen May 21, 2026
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writingtheir own version, first seen May 10, 2026
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 25, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 8
- zsyggg/paper-craft-skills★ 1.2ksame name
- OpenLAIR/dr-claw★ 1.2ksame name
- Boom5426/Nature-Paper-Skills★ 661same name
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skills★ 43same name
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 42same name
- JavaLyHn/paper-analyzer★ 4same name
- lyx2022518/sherlock-ai-plugin★ 3same name
- for302/ClaudeSkills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository35 other files it gives its agents.
- analytic-memoSkill
- argument-auditorSkill
- cjournal-analyzerSkill
- cnki-advanced-searchSkill
- concept-clarifierSkill
- conceptual-framework-builderSkill
- counterfactual-reasoningSkill
- design-coherence-checkSkill
- feishu-paper-reviewerSkill
- foreign-literature-searchSkill
- grounded-codingSkill
- introduction-writerSkill
- literature-review-writerSkill
- literature-verifierSkill
- memo-coachSkill
- negative-case-finderSkill
- paper-formatterSkill
- paper-reviewerSkill
- paper-title-abstract-keywordsSkill
- pdf-bib-importSkill
- phd-literature-reviewSkill
- problematizationSkill
- skill-installerSkill
- strategy-makerSkill
- ta-discussion-writerSkill
- ta-findings-writerSkill
- ta-framework-builderSkill
- ta-framework-writerSkill
- ta-methods-writerSkill
- ta-research-AFP-autoSkill
- ta-research-AFPSkill
- text-to-excelSkill
- thematic-analysisSkill
- theory-fit-assessmentSkill
- top-journals-methods-scoutSkill
The file
Files
论文结构化拆解分析
基于12个阅读要素对学术论文进行结构化拆解,结果保存为Excel文件存储于论文所在文件夹中。
工作流程
1. 读取论文
- 使用 Read 工具读取用户提供的论文文件(支持 PDF、Word 等格式)
- 对于 PDF 文件,如果 Read 工具无法直接读取,使用
pdftotext命令提取文本 - 对于 PDF 文件,如果页数较多,先读取前几页了解结构,再分批读取全文
- 确保完整阅读论文的各个部分:摘要、引言、文献综述、方法、结果、讨论、结论
- 记录论文所在的文件夹路径,用于后续保存Excel文件
2. 按12要素提取信息
阅读论文后,逐一提取12个阅读要素。要素定义详见 references/reading_elements.md。
提取要点:
- 研究背景: 从引言开头提取宏观背景,区分实践背景、理论背景、政策背景
- 研究问题: 识别核心研究问题,判断其类型(what/why/how/should)
- 研究结论: 从结论和讨论部分提取对研究问题的直接回答
- 文献综合: 从文献综述部分梳理作者如何分类整理已有研究
- 文献批评: 提取作者对已有研究的评价,重点关注研究gap的表述
- 研究方法: 从方法论部分提取具体研究方法和研究设计
- 理论视角与理论框架: 识别论文采用的理论基础和分析框架
- 一致性发现: 从讨论部分提取与已有研究一致的发现
- 不一致性发现: 从讨论部分提取与已有研究不一致的发现
- 研究贡献: 提取作者自述的研究贡献(新方法/新材料/新理论/新观点/新概念)
- 研究不足: 从结论或讨论的局限性部分提取
- 未来研究展望: 提取作者对后续研究的建议
如论文中某要素未明确提及,标注"论文未明确提及"并尝试基于论文内容进行合理推断,推断内容用括号标注。
3. 保存为Excel文件
分析完成后,将结果保存为Excel文件,存放于被分析论文所在的文件夹中。
使用 scripts/export_excel.py 脚本生成Excel。先用 Python 将分析数据写入临时JSON文件,再调用脚本。
单篇论文
生成文件名:论文拆解_<论文简称>.xlsx,包含一个工作表。
构造JSON数据并调用脚本:
python3 <skill_path>/scripts/export_excel.py --mode single --output "<论文所在文件夹>/论文拆解_<论文简称>.xlsx" --json '<json_string>'JSON结构:
{
"title": "论文标题",
"author": "作者",
"source": "期刊/来源",
"year": "年份",
"elements": {
"研究背景": "内容...",
"研究问题": "内容...",
"研究结论": "内容...",
"文献综合": "内容...",
"文献批评": "内容...",
"研究方法": "内容...",
"理论视角与理论框架": "内容...",
"一致性发现": "内容...",
"不一致性发现": "内容...",
"研究贡献": "内容...",
"研究不足": "内容...",
"未来研究展望": "内容..."
}
}多篇论文
生成文件名:论文拆解汇总_<N>篇.xlsx,包含每篇论文的独立工作表 + 最后一个"横向对比汇总"工作表。
python3 <skill_path>/scripts/export_excel.py --mode multi --output "<论文所在文件夹>/论文拆解汇总_<N>篇.xlsx" --json '<json_string>'JSON结构:
{
"papers": [
{ "title": "...", "author": "...", "source": "...", "year": "...", "elements": { ... } },
...
],
"summary": {
"paper_labels": ["论文A简称", "论文B简称", ...],
"elements": {
"研究背景": ["论文A精简版", "论文B精简版", ...],
...12个要素各一个数组...
}
}
}重要:由于JSON字符串可能很长,使用Python将JSON写入临时文件,再用 --json "$(cat /tmp/paper_data.json)" 传入,或直接在Python中调用脚本。推荐方式:
import json, subprocess
data = { ... } # 构造好的数据
with open("/tmp/_paper_analysis.json", "w") as f:
json.dump(data, f, ensure_ascii=False)
subprocess.run(["python3", "<skill_path>/scripts/export_excel.py",
"--mode", "multi",
"--output", "<输出路径>",
"--json", json.dumps(data, ensure_ascii=False)])4. 输出到对话
在保存Excel后,同时在对话中以markdown表格简要呈现分析结果,并告知用户Excel文件的保存路径。
5. 内容要求
- 使用中文输出(除非论文为英文且用户要求英文输出)
- 每个要素的内容应简明扼要但信息充分,单篇表格中每个要素2-5句话
- 汇总对比表中每个单元格压缩为1-2句核心要点
- 忠于论文原文,避免过度解读;推断内容明确标注
- 在研究问题要素中标注问题类型(what/why/how/should)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

