paper-analyzer
Skill661 starsChanged 36 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when deeply analyzing a single paper and producing structured notes on claims, methods, figures, evaluation, strengths, limitations, and related work.
8 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- OpenLAIR/dr-clawedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- JavaLyHn/paper-analyzertheir own version, first seen May 23, 2026
- zsyggg/paper-craft-skillstheir own version, first seen May 21, 2026
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writingword for word, first seen May 10, 2026
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 25, 2026
- yipng05-max/-skillstheir own version, first seen Apr 2, 2026
Other versions8 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Chanw-research/claude-code-paper-writing★ 42100% same
Edited · 1
- OpenLAIR/dr-claw★ 1.2k79% same
Wrote their own version · 6
- zsyggg/paper-craft-skills★ 1.2ksame name
- yipng05-max/-skills★ 302same name
- jiahao-shao1/sjh-skills★ 43same name
- JavaLyHn/paper-analyzer★ 4same name
- lyx2022518/sherlock-ai-plugin★ 3same name
- for302/ClaudeSkills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository26 other files it gives its agents.
- anti-defensive-writingSkill
- citation-verifierSkill
- claim-source-verificationSkill
- data-availabilitySkill
- draft-marker-disciplineSkill
- figure-plannerSkill
- manuscript-optimizerSkill
- paper-bootstrapSkill
- paper-workflowSkill
- rebuttal-responseSkill
- results-section-revisionSkill
- review-article-architectureSkill
- scientific-prose-styleSkill
- scientific-writingSkill
- stats-reporting-auditSkill
- submission-auditSkill
- write-scientific-manuscriptSkill
- figure-styleSkill
- nature-figureSkill
- academic-presentationsSkill
- conference-paper-writingSkill
- reference-audit-guideSkill
- academic-researcherSkill
- results-analysisSkill
- paper-reviewerSkill
- nature-portfolio-playbookSkill
The file
Files
Paper Analyzer
Overview
Perform deep analysis of a specific paper, generating structured notes that cover claims, methodology, experiment evaluation, strengths and limitations, and links to adjacent work.
Workflow
Step 1: Identify Paper
Accept input: arXiv ID (e.g., "2402.12345"), full ID ("arXiv:2402.12345"), paper title, or file path.
Step 2: Fetch Paper Content
curl -L "https://arxiv.org/pdf/[PAPER_ID]" -o /tmp/paper_analysis/[PAPER_ID].pdf
curl -L "https://arxiv.org/e-print/[PAPER_ID]" -o /tmp/paper_analysis/[PAPER_ID].tar.gz
curl -s "https://arxiv.org/abs/[PAPER_ID]" > /tmp/paper_analysis/arxiv_page.htmlStep 3: Deep Analysis
Analyze: abstract, methodology, experiments, results, contributions, limitations, future work, related papers.
Step 4: Generate Note
python scripts/generate_note.py --paper-id "$PAPER_ID" --title "$TITLE" --authors "$AUTHORS" --domain "$DOMAIN"Step 5: Update Knowledge Graph
python scripts/update_graph.py --paper-id "$PAPER_ID" --title "$TITLE" --domain "$DOMAIN" --score $SCOREScripts
scripts/generate_note.py— Generate structured note templatescripts/update_graph.py— Update paper relationship graph
Note Structure
The generated note includes: core info, abstract (EN/CN), research background, method overview with architecture figures, experiment results with tables, deep analysis, related paper comparison, tech roadmap positioning, future work, and comprehensive evaluation (0-10 scoring).
Dependencies
- Python 3.8+, PyYAML, requests
- Network access (arXiv)
Based on evil-read-arxiv — an automated paper reading workflow. MIT License.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

