sova-develop-full
Skill3 starsChanged 4 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Full development workflow: TDD, lint, test, self-review, commit organization. Provide a ticket ID or task description.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-patternsSkill
- design-systemSkill
- design-tasteSkill
- issue-templateSkill
- sova-address-prSkill
- sova-after-mergeSkill
- sova-agent-readinessSkill
- sova-audit-instructionsSkill
- sova-debugSkill
- sova-develop-explainSkill
- sova-developSkill
- sova-extract-knowledgeSkill
- sova-find-taskSkill
- sova-health-auditSkill
- sova-ingest-reviewSkill
- sova-integrate-prSkill
- sova-issueSkill
- sova-new-featureSkill
- sova-optimize-knowledgeSkill
- sova-prSkill
- sova-rearrange-commitsSkill
- sova-researchSkill
- sova-review-fullSkill
- sova-review-prSkill
- sova-reviewSkill
- sova-simplifySkill
- sova-specSkill
- sova-standupSkill
- sova-statusSkill
- sova-testSkill
- sova-update-docsSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- visual-auditSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-patternsSkill
- design-tasteSkill
- issue-templateSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- visual-auditSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
If found with Status: approved: read it.
- Distinctive: line 18
If not found: continue silently.
- Very specific: line 19
If it's an issue number, fetch details.
- Distinctive: line 31
If the project uses a GitHub Projects board, move the issue to "In Progress".
- Distinctive: line 32
Read the project's CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md for conventions and patterns.
- Distinctive: line 33
Read agent memory files if they exist:
- Very specific: line 37
Check current branch: if on main/master, create a feature branch before developing, the same way the sova-new-feature skill does (in a …
- Very specific: line 47
Follow the sova-develop skill workflow:
- Distinctive: line 50
Implement the solution: follow existing codebase conventions.
- Distinctive: line 54
If any check fails, fix and re-run (up to 3 attempts).
- Very specific: line 72
Follow the sova-rearrange-commits skill approach:
- Distinctive: line 80
Commit messages should explain the 'why', not just the 'what'.
- Very specific: line 84
Write a file at .agent-summary.md in the working directory with:
- Very specific: line 100
After this command completes, run the sova-pr skill to create the pull request.
- Distinctive: line 104
Follow patterns from the project's existing code and CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md
- Distinctive: line 105
NEVER use emojis in any output
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Full Development Workflow
Develop a feature or fix end-to-end with TDD, testing, self-review, and clean commit history.
Instructions
Phase 0: Understand the Task
- Get the task from
the arguments provided when this skill is invoked: either a GitHub Issue number or a task description. - Check for spec (issue numbers only): look for
.claude/specs/{issue-number}-*.md.- If found with
Status: approved: read it. Report: "Using approved spec: {filename}". Thesova-developskill step will follow this spec as its primary guide. - If found with
Status: draft: warn the user: "Draft spec exists at {filename} but is not approved. Run thesova-specskill {issue} to review and approve it, or proceed without spec guidance." Wait for user confirmation before continuing (when running headless, with no user to confirm, proceed without spec guidance and say so in the summary). - If not found: continue silently. Specs are optional; not every task needs one.
- If found with
- If it's an issue number, fetch details. When an approved spec was found in step 2, it already encodes the task intent in distilled form, so omit
bodyand fetch only the fields this phase still needs (claiming, branch naming, labels):# No approved spec: gh issue view <ISSUE_NUMBER> --json number,title,body,labels,milestone # Approved spec found in step 2: gh issue view <ISSUE_NUMBER> --json number,title,labels,milestone - Claim the issue (GitHub Issues only):
If the project uses a GitHub Projects board, move the issue to "In Progress".# Assign to self gh issue edit <ISSUE_NUMBER> --add-assignee @me - Read the project's CLAUDE.md and AGENTS.md for conventions and patterns.
- Read agent memory files if they exist:
.claude/agent-memory/MEMORY.mdand.claude/agent-memory/common-mistakes.md- The cookbook: when
.claude/agent-memory/cookbook/exists, read itsREADME.mdindex and then only the domain files for the modules this work touches (the whole cookbook is too large to load); otherwise read.claude/agent-memory/cookbook.md
- Identify which module(s) this work touches and read relevant source code.
- Check current branch: if on main/master, create a feature branch before developing, the same way the
sova-new-featureskill does (in a dedicated worktree when the project keeps branches under.claude/worktrees/, so the primary checkout stays on the base branch):BRANCH=$(git branch --show-current) if [ "$BRANCH" = "main" ] || [ "$BRANCH" = "master" ]; then echo "On main branch. Create a feature branch before developing." fi
Phase 1: Develop (TDD)
Follow the sova-develop skill workflow:
- Write tests first: define expected behavior before implementation.
- Implement the solution: follow existing codebase conventions.
- Scout check: for every file touched, fix pre-existing issues you notice (failing tests, lint warnings, dead code, obvious bugs). Keep fixes small and low-risk.
- Run the project-specific build steps from the
sova-developskill's Step 5 (CSS rebuilds, static cache version bumps, translation catalogs) when your change calls for them. - Run the full CI-equivalent checks:
make check. It is only as complete as the project configured it: ifmake checkis not the same target CI runs, also run the CI steps it omits (read the CI workflow file to list them). - If any check fails, fix and re-run (up to 3 attempts).
Phase 2: Self-Review
Follow the sova-review skill workflow:
- Review your own diff:
git diff - Check for:
- Bugs, edge cases, off-by-one errors
- Missing test coverage
- Security concerns
- Code style consistency with the rest of the module
- Unnecessary changes or leftover debug code
- Address all findings (fix or acknowledge with justification).
- Re-run tests after fixes.
Phase 3: Organize Commits
Follow the sova-rearrange-commits skill approach:
- Separate concerns: schema/model changes, core logic, tests, config in distinct commits.
- Each commit should be self-contained and reviewable on its own.
- Commit message format:
type(scope): description- Types and scopes: only those the project's commit format invariant or AGENTS.md lists (commonly feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, ci); never invent one such as
perf, since pre-push hooks reject it - Example:
feat(auth): add token refresh endpoint
- Types and scopes: only those the project's commit format invariant or AGENTS.md lists (commonly feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore, ci); never invent one such as
- NEVER create a single monolithic commit with all changes.
- Commit messages should explain the 'why', not just the 'what'.
Phase 4: Summary
Write a file at .agent-summary.md in the working directory with:
- Big picture: 3-5 sentence narrative explaining the problem, why it matters, and why this approach. Written for someone unfamiliar with the ticket.
- What changed: Brief description of all changes.
- How it worked before / How it works now: Behavior delta.
- Manual test instructions: Exact commands, expected outputs, edge cases, what success/failure looks like.
- Files changed: List with one-line descriptions.
Workflow Chain
This command orchestrates:
- the
sova-developskill: implement with TDD - the
sova-testskill: verify linter + tests pass - the
sova-reviewskill: self-review and auto-fix - the
sova-rearrange-commitsskill: organize into logical commits
After this command completes, run the sova-pr skill to create the pull request.
Rules
- Follow patterns from the project's existing code and CLAUDE.md/AGENTS.md
- NEVER use emojis in any output
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

