design-taste
Skill3 starsChanged 7 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Generic UI design review checklist and best practices, adaptable to any project's design system. Auto-activates when reviewing or validating UI changes for visual quality.
19 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jmusick/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- itsryanarmani/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Littlpinguin/marketing-cockpit-templatetheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- Tcuzzo/backs-aios-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- pooriaarab/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- arez-xd/ux-ui-design-tastetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use slides and design-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JetBrainsSkillslides
Create and edit presentation slide decks (`.pptx`) with PptxGenJS and render/validation utilities. Use when tasks involve building a new PowerPoint deck, recreating slides from screenshots/PDFs/reference decks, modifying slide content while preserving editable output, adding charts/diagrams/visuals, or diagnosing layout issues such as overflow, overlaps, and font substitution.
Also in 3 projects that use this
dillonluiSkilldesign-review
Review a view or flow for UX and UI issues. Provides severity-ranked, actionable findings grounded in established design heuristics. Use when the user asks for design feedback, UX review, or UI critique.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions19 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 19
- sendaifun/solana-new★ 178same name
- duncan-buildroom/freeskills★ 65same name
- h3nryprod01/design-taste★ 59same name
- Littlpinguin/marketing-cockpit-template★ 9same name
- TbusOS/sky-skills★ 3same name
- customware-ai/skills★ 2same name
- sandipmandalgit/design_taste★ 2same name
- Tcuzzo/backs-aios-skills★ 2same name
- arez-xd/ux-ui-design-taste★ 1same name
- itsryanarmani/skills★ 1same name
9 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository44 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- templates/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- templates/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-patternsSkill
- design-systemSkill
- issue-templateSkill
- sova-address-prSkill
- sova-after-mergeSkill
- sova-agent-readinessSkill
- sova-audit-instructionsSkill
- sova-debugSkill
- sova-develop-explainSkill
- sova-develop-fullSkill
- sova-developSkill
- sova-extract-knowledgeSkill
- sova-find-taskSkill
- sova-health-auditSkill
- sova-ingest-reviewSkill
- sova-integrate-prSkill
- sova-issueSkill
- sova-new-featureSkill
- sova-optimize-knowledgeSkill
- sova-prSkill
- sova-rearrange-commitsSkill
- sova-researchSkill
- sova-review-fullSkill
- sova-review-prSkill
- sova-reviewSkill
- sova-simplifySkill
- sova-specSkill
- sova-standupSkill
- sova-statusSkill
- sova-testSkill
- sova-update-docsSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- visual-auditSkill
- dashboard-designSkill
- database-patternsSkill
- design-tasteSkill
- issue-templateSkill
- testing-patternsSkill
- visual-auditSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Use this checklist when creating, modifying, or reviewing UI elements on a project whose own design system isn't already covered by a more …
- Distinctive: line 19
Read the project's design system documentation.
- Distinctive: line 22
Check existing components before building anything new.
- Distinctive: line 83
Check the design system: how is this element already defined?
- Distinctive: line 84
Check existing code: is this already implemented somewhere?
- Distinctive: line 87
Test in context: light/dark mode, responsive layout, interactive states.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Design Taste
Use this checklist when creating, modifying, or reviewing UI elements on a
project whose own design system isn't already covered by a more specific
skill. It is generic by design: before applying it, read the project's own
design system documentation (for example docs/design-system.md or a style
guide), identify its component library (Bootstrap, Material, DaisyUI, custom,
etc.) and how colors are defined, named, and applied, then map each category
below onto that project's actual tokens, components, and conventions rather
than applying the generic names literally.
Before You Start
- Read the project's design system documentation.
- Identify the component library in use.
- Understand how the color system is defined, named, and applied.
- Check existing components before building anything new.
Areas to Review
Colors
- Use only colors from the project's defined palette
- Use CSS variables / tokens, not hardcoded values
- Test in both light and dark modes, if applicable
- Avoid arbitrary color choices; ask "why this shade?"
- No semantic color abuse (red/green for non-semantic data)
Buttons
- Follow the project's button variants (primary, secondary, tertiary, etc.)
- Clear, action-oriented labels
- Don't create new button variants without a design review
- Hover/active/disabled states are visible
- One primary CTA per form or section, when applicable
Icons
- Check the existing icon library before creating new icons
- Consistent sizing for similar use cases
- Use the component system if available; don't inline raw SVGs
- Decorative icons are hidden from screen readers
- Action icons are clearly labeled
Typography
- Follow the project's type scale (headings, body, small, etc.)
- Consistent font weights for hierarchy
- Adequate line height for readability
- Responsive sizing on mobile
- Monetary/data values use appropriate styling
Forms
- All inputs have associated labels
- Focus states are clearly visible and accessible
- Error states are clearly indicated
- Consistent spacing and padding
- Validation messages are clear and helpful
Spacing and Layout
- Consistent margins and padding
- Follows the project's spacing scale, if one is defined
- White space is used intentionally
- Mobile responsive (reflow, not hidden elements)
Components
- Reuse existing components instead of rebuilding them
- Component props are used correctly
- No broken references to removed components
- Composition supports the intended layout
Accessibility
- Sufficient color contrast (WCAG AA minimum)
- Semantic HTML (proper heading hierarchy, etc.)
- Keyboard navigation works
- ARIA labels where needed
- Alt text for images
Workflow
- Identify the element: button, card, form, icon, etc.
- Check the design system: how is this element already defined?
- Check existing code: is this already implemented somewhere?
- Build or modify the element, following project conventions.
- Validate against the checklist above.
- Test in context: light/dark mode, responsive layout, interactive states.
- Get a design review if unsure about visual direction.
Common Pitfalls
- Color drift: adding colors outside the palette
- Variant sprawl: creating new button/badge variants without design guidance
- Hardcoded values: colors, sizes, or spacing hardcoded instead of using design tokens
- Theme blindness: testing only light mode, or only dark mode
- Component duplication: building new components that already exist
- Missing accessibility: insufficient contrast, no labels, no keyboard support
- Inconsistent spacing: arbitrary padding/margins instead of a defined scale
How to Adapt This Checklist
Replace the generic category names with the project's real equivalents before
using this checklist. For example, a project on Material Design with custom
colors maps "palette" onto its Material color variable names, "button
variants" onto Material's filled/outlined/text variants, and "spacing scale"
onto Material's 4px/8px/12px/16px increments; a project on Tailwind maps
"palette" onto tailwind.config.js's color definitions and "spacing scale"
onto Tailwind's own spacing scale. The categories above stay the same;
only the vocabulary and the concrete values change.
Fold this checklist into the project's own review and development workflow rather than running it as a one-off: a UI change is most likely to regress design consistency during development, not after it ships.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

