review-writing
Skill5 starsChanged 23 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
用于撰写对标 Nature/Cell/Lancet 水平的学术文献综述，适用于需系统检索、文献整合与引用管理的综述类稿件。支持四种综述类型：叙述性综述；系统综述与 Meta 分析（叠加 PRISMA 2020 流程、PICO/PECO 纳排登记、逐研究偏倚风险评估与 GRADE 证据分级）；scoping review（采用 PCC 框架，流程从简）；WHY-HOW-WHAT 三层轻量对比模式。技能提供 Zotero 实时集成、大纲持久化与多模式文献管理，全程执行引用真实性核验与反 AI 腔约束。触发词：写综述、文献综述、综述写作、literature review、review article、改综述、完善综述、继续写综述、improve review。本技能不适用于原始研究论文、单篇论文的修改与润色、三千词以下的短篇评论，以及科普、博客等非学术写作。
3 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Xuzhen-Li/literature-review-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- wu-yc/LabClawtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- xiaojinlucky/skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 29, 2026
Other versions3 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 3
- wu-yc/LabClaw★ 1.1ksame name
- Xuzhen-Li/literature-review-skills★ 2same name
- xiaojinlucky/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-gateSkill
- general-sci-writingSkill
- idea-bombSkill
- nsfc-proposalSkill
- polish-sciSkill
- reviewer-response-sciSkill
- reviewer-simulatorSkill
- revise-sciSkill
- sci2docSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 7 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
7
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.