nsfc-proposal
Skill5 starsChanged 23 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
用于国家自然科学基金申请书（2026 版模板）的撰写、结构重组与润色。提供两种工作模式：写作模式从零分阶段构建，润色模式导入既有稿件后先行诊断再逐节修订。技能执行逐节签字门禁，强制维持科学假说、研究目标、研究内容与关键科学问题四者的一致性，通过 paper-search MCP 核验文献真实性，并施加反 AI 腔的中文学术写作约束。字数与页数上限以脚本核算结果为准。触发词：国自然、国家自然科学基金、基金申请书、科研申请、NSFC、标书、本子、面上项目、青年基金。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skillstheir own version, first seen Mar 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- LeonChaoX/qinyan-academic-skills★ 910same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-gateSkill
- general-sci-writingSkill
- idea-bombSkill
- polish-sciSkill
- reviewer-response-sciSkill
- reviewer-simulatorSkill
- review-writingSkill
- revise-sciSkill
- sci2docSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.