general-sci-writing
Skill5 starsChanged 23 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
用于从零撰写或润色符合 Nature/Science/Cell 标准的 SCI 研究论文(Article 类型),适用于多学科。用户提供研究数据、实验结果或已有初稿,本技能以分阶段管道推进:故事脉络构建、主图集规划、文献检索、逐节撰写、摘要凝练、质量控制与投稿包准备,最终产出可直接投稿的完整稿件。全程执行反 AI 腔约束与文献真实性核验,不杜撰数据与参考文献。触发词:写论文、SCI论文、学术写作、科研写作、论文润色、研究论文、学术投稿、投稿、润色论文、polish paper、write SCI paper、academic writing、draft paper、manuscript writing。路由说明:退稿或返修需修改主稿的,使用 revise-sci;仅撰写审稿意见回复的,使用 reviewer-response-sci;对他人已完成的整稿执行纯语言润色、不进入本管道的,使用 polish-sci,本技能所称润色仅指管道内 Phase 10 对自写稿的润色;撰写综述或文献综述的,使用 review-writing。本技能侧重新稿撰写与自写稿润色。Phase 13B 提供退稿后的逐条 gap 分析与改稿,并生成内部 response letter(reviews/response_letter.md),但不产出正式投稿用的完整回复包,亦不单独输出修订稿 docx;需要正式回复包应使用 reviewer-response-sci。
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- academic-gateSkill
- idea-bombSkill
- nsfc-proposalSkill
- polish-sciSkill
- reviewer-response-sciSkill
- reviewer-simulatorSkill
- review-writingSkill
- revise-sciSkill
- sci2docSkill
The file
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

