agentleFS
Sign inStart free
wpsnotewpsnote/wpsnote-skills/skills/prerequisite-gap-finder/SKILL.md

prerequisite-gap-finder

Skill184 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

当用户觉得一个主题看不懂、学得卡住，或者想知道自己到底缺了哪些前置基础时使用此 Skill。适合课程复习、自学卡点分析、考前查漏补缺、回看旧笔记时发现“明明记了但还是不会”的场景。

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow the shared workflow in ../wps-learning-workflow.md.

    line 9

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

WPS Prerequisite Gap Finder 2.0

Follow the shared workflow in ../wps-learning-workflow.md.

Inputs

  • 当前感觉吃力的一篇 WPS 学习笔记或主题
  • 可能覆盖基础知识的旧 WPS 笔记
  • 可选的课程阶段、考试背景或难度说明

Output

A structured WPS-ready 前置知识缺口报告，包含缺失基础、修复路径和补完后的自测项。

What this skill should produce

目标不只是告诉用户“这里有缺口”，而是进一步说明：缺什么、为什么卡、先补什么、补完后怎么验。

建议包含这些部分：

  1. required prerequisites
  2. covered in existing notes
  3. missing or weak
  4. why this blocks understanding
  5. repair plan
  6. self-check after repair

WPS-first rules

  • 如果旧笔记里已经有能补基础的内容，要明确点出对应笔记标题。
  • 如果没有可回看的旧笔记，也要直说，不要硬编。
  • 修复计划尽量拆成小动作，并给出大致投入量。

Quality rules

  • 把缺口分成 blocker、important but recoverable、optional depth 三档。
  • 更关注“阻断理解”的基础，而不是所有相关背景都一股脑列出来。
  • 缺口说明要和当前主题直接挂钩，让用户知道为什么这里会卡。

This skill should identify prerequisite gaps, not diagnose all misunderstandings in the current note.

Do not use when

  • 用户想找的是当前笔记内部的错误或误解
  • 主题本身已经理解得差不多，只需要抽复习重点
  • 当前主题范围太散，无法形成有意义的前置链条

Recommended next skill

Usually recommend:

  • misconception-finder
  • study-note-linker

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free