agentleFS
wpgauravwpgaurav/WordPress-skills/skills/wordpress/wordpress-router/SKILL.md

wordpress-router

Skill19 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when the user asks about WordPress codebases (plugins, themes, block themes, Gutenberg blocks, WP core checkouts) and you need to quickly classify the repo and route to the correct workflow/skill (blocks, theme.json, REST API, WP-CLI, performance, security, testing, release packaging).

5 other projects use a version of this, 4 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

8 rules. 6 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 6

    Common

    Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Use this skill at the start of most WordPress tasks to:

    line 14
  2. Common:

    Run the project triage script:

    line 27
  3. Common:

    Read the triage output and classify:

    line 29
  4. Common:

    Prefer the repo’s existing tooling and conventions for builds/tests.

    line 38
  5. Very specific:

    Run the repo’s lint/test/build commands that the triage output recommends (if available).

    line 43
  6. Very specific:

    If triage reports kind: unknown, inspect:

    line 47
  7. Common:

    If the repo is huge, consider narrowing scanning scope or adding ignore rules to the triage script.

    line 49
  8. Common:

    If routing is ambiguous, ask one question:

    line 53

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

From Agent Skills for WordPress. Copyright (C) 2026 WordPress Contributors, licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later. Changed from upstream: the compatibility: frontmatter line was dropped when this copy was made in March 2026, and license frontmatter plus this notice were added on 2026-10-24. See NOTICE.md.

WordPress Router

When to use

Use this skill at the start of most WordPress tasks to:

  • identify what kind of WordPress codebase this is (plugin vs theme vs block theme vs WP core checkout vs full site),
  • pick the right workflow and guardrails,
  • delegate to the most relevant domain skill(s).

Inputs required

  • Repo root (current working directory).
  • The user’s intent (what they want changed) and any constraints (WP version targets, WP.com specifics, release requirements).

Procedure

  1. Run the project triage script:
    • node skills/wp-project-triage/scripts/detect_wp_project.mjs
  2. Read the triage output and classify:
    • primary project kind(s),
    • tooling available (PHP/Composer, Node, @wordpress/scripts),
    • tests present (PHPUnit, Playwright, wp-env),
    • any version hints.
  3. Route to domain workflows based on user intent + repo kind:
    • For the decision tree, read: skills/wordpress-router/references/decision-tree.md.
  4. Apply guardrails before making changes:
    • Confirm any version constraints if unclear.
    • Prefer the repo’s existing tooling and conventions for builds/tests.

Verification

  • Re-run the triage script if you create or restructure significant files.
  • Run the repo’s lint/test/build commands that the triage output recommends (if available).

Failure modes / debugging

  • If triage reports kind: unknown, inspect:
    • root composer.json, package.json, style.css, block.json, theme.json, wp-content/.
  • If the repo is huge, consider narrowing scanning scope or adding ignore rules to the triage script.

Escalation

  • If routing is ambiguous, ask one question:
    • “Is this intended to be a WordPress plugin, a theme (classic/block), or a full site repo?”

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.