agentleFS
wpgauravwpgaurav/WordPress-skills/skills/design/normalize/SKILL.md

normalize

Skill19 starsChanged 20 days agoMITView on GitHub

Normalize design to match your design system and ensure consistency

25 other projects use a version of this, 21 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use arrange, overdrive and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • HK-hubSkill

    arrange

    Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • HK-hubSkill

    overdrive

    Pushes interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations — shaders, spring physics, scroll-driven reveals, 60fps animations. Use when the user wants to wow, impress, go all-out, or make something that feels extraordinary.

    Also in 14 projects that use this

  • +1 more from HK-hub

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 12 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 12

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Before making changes, deeply understand the context:

    line 19
  2. Common:

    Discover the design system: Search for design system documentation, UI guidelines, component libraries, or style guides (grep for "design …

    line 21
  3. Common:

    CRITICAL: If something isn't clear, ask.

    line 27
  4. Common:

    Typography: Use design system fonts, sizes, weights, and line heights.

    line 45
  5. Common:

    Spacing & Layout: Use spacing tokens (margins, padding, gaps).

    line 47
  6. Common:

    Responsive Behavior: Ensure breakpoints and responsive patterns align with design system standards.

    line 50
  7. Common:

    Accessibility: Verify contrast ratios, focus states, ARIA labels match design system requirements.

    line 51
  8. Common:

    Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist

    line 55
  9. Common:

    After normalization, ensure code quality:

    line 64
  10. Common:

    Consolidate reusable components: If you created new components that should be shared, move them to the design system or shared UI component …

    line 66
  11. Common:

    Remove orphaned code: Delete unused implementations, styles, or files made obsolete by normalization.

    line 67
  12. Common:

    Ensure DRYness: Look for duplication introduced during refactoring and consolidate.

    line 69

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Adapted from impeccable by Paul Bakaus, used under the Apache License 2.0. Modified for this collection; see NOTICE.md for what changed.

Analyze and redesign the feature to perfectly match our design system standards, aesthetics, and established patterns.

Plan

Before making changes, deeply understand the context:

  1. Discover the design system: Search for design system documentation, UI guidelines, component libraries, or style guides (grep for "design system", "ui guide", "style guide", etc.). Study it thoroughly until you understand:

    • Core design principles and aesthetic direction
    • Target audience and personas
    • Component patterns and conventions
    • Design tokens (colors, typography, spacing)

    CRITICAL: If something isn't clear, ask. Don't guess at design system principles.

  2. Analyze the current feature: Assess what works and what doesn't:
    • Where does it deviate from design system patterns?
    • Which inconsistencies are cosmetic vs. functional?
    • What's the root cause—missing tokens, one-off implementations, or conceptual misalignment?
  3. Create a normalization plan: Define specific changes that will align the feature with the design system:

    • Which components can be replaced with design system equivalents?
    • Which styles need to use design tokens instead of hard-coded values?
    • How can UX patterns match established user flows?

    IMPORTANT: Great design is effective design. Prioritize UX consistency and usability over visual polish alone. Think through the best possible experience for your use case and personas first.

Execute

Systematically address all inconsistencies across these dimensions:

  • Typography: Use design system fonts, sizes, weights, and line heights. Replace hard-coded values with typographic tokens or classes.
  • Color & Theme: Apply design system color tokens. Remove one-off color choices that break the palette.
  • Spacing & Layout: Use spacing tokens (margins, padding, gaps). Align with grid systems and layout patterns used elsewhere.
  • Components: Replace custom implementations with design system components. Ensure props and variants match established patterns.
  • Motion & Interaction: Match animation timing, easing, and interaction patterns to other features.
  • Responsive Behavior: Ensure breakpoints and responsive patterns align with design system standards.
  • Accessibility: Verify contrast ratios, focus states, ARIA labels match design system requirements.
  • Progressive Disclosure: Match information hierarchy and complexity management to established patterns.

NEVER:

  • Create new one-off components when design system equivalents exist
  • Hard-code values that should use design tokens
  • Introduce new patterns that diverge from the design system
  • Compromise accessibility for visual consistency

This is not an exhaustive list—apply judgment to identify all areas needing normalization.

Clean Up

After normalization, ensure code quality:

  • Consolidate reusable components: If you created new components that should be shared, move them to the design system or shared UI component path.
  • Remove orphaned code: Delete unused implementations, styles, or files made obsolete by normalization.
  • Verify quality: Lint, type-check, and test according to repository guidelines. Ensure normalization didn't introduce regressions.
  • Ensure DRYness: Look for duplication introduced during refactoring and consolidate.

Remember: You are a brilliant frontend designer with impeccable taste, equally strong in UX and UI. Your attention to detail and eye for end-to-end user experience is world class. Execute with precision and thoroughness.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.