agentleFS
wonderslifewonderslife/pdd-skills/pdd-implement-feature/SKILL.md

pdd-implement-feature

Skill41 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

Implement feature point code based on development specifications. Call this Skill when users want to start coding implementation. 支持中文触发:实现功能点、编码实现、开始编码、功能开发、代码实现、PDD实现。

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. About 0 are common, 10 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈10

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test Cases (test-cases.md, optional)

    line 17
  2. Distinctive:

    When encountering technical issues during implementation, call expert-xxx as needed:

    line 52
  3. Very specific:

    Read acceptance items from dev-specs/FP-{sequence}/checklist.md.

    line 86
  4. Distinctive:

    If test cases exist, run test validation:

    line 216
  5. Very specific:

    Update acceptance status in checklist.md:

    line 223
  6. Distinctive:

    Follow the core rules of software-engineer skill:

    line 341
  7. Distinctive:

    Read existing code style before writing new code

    line 342
  8. Distinctive:

    Must implement all interfaces defined in specifications

    line 352
  9. Distinctive:

    Must handle all exceptions defined in specifications

    line 353
  10. Distinctive:

    Must pass all acceptance items before marking as complete

    line 354
  11. Distinctive:

    Must synchronize specification documents after code changes

    line 355
  12. Distinctive:

    After feature point implementation and validation passes, prompt user that PR management skills can be used:

    line 379

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Feature Point Implementation - Implement feature point code based on development specifications

Input:

  • Development Specification (spec.md)
  • Acceptance Criteria (checklist.md)
  • Test Cases (test-cases.md, optional)

Output:

  • Code files
  • Acceptance report

Version History

VersionDateChanges
3.22026-03-22Added error handling and fallback specifications, PDD implementation specification references
3.12026-03-22Removed automatic calling of pdd-pr-* skills, changed to only prompt user for manual calling
3.02026-03-21Added PR management layer integration (pdd-pr-*)
2.02026-03-21Added software-engineer and expert-xxx calling integration
1.0EarlyInitial version

1. Skill Integration

1.1 Software Engineer Invocation

During code implementation, call the software-engineer skill:

Invocation TimingService Content
Code ImplementationExecute code implementation based on specifications
Unit TestingWrite unit tests and integration tests
Code RefactoringCode optimization following coding standards
Defect FixingError handling and issue resolution

1.2 Expert Skill Invocation

When encountering technical issues during implementation, call expert-xxx as needed:

Expert SkillTrigger ConditionExpected Output
expert-ruoyiRuoYi framework issuesSolution + Best practices
expert-activitiWorkflow issuesBPMN design recommendations
expert-mysqlDatabase issuesSQL optimization solution
expert-code-qualityCode quality issuesRefactoring solution

1.3 Invocation Conditions

Must call software-engineer:

  • Entering code implementation phase
  • Need to write test code

Call expert-xxx as needed:

  • Encountering RuoYi framework issues
  • Encountering database design issues
  • Encountering code quality issues

2. Process Steps

Step 1: Read Development Specification

Read from dev-specs/FP-{sequence}/spec.md:

  • Interface definitions
  • Data models
  • Business logic
  • Test cases

Step 2: Read Acceptance Criteria

Read acceptance items from dev-specs/FP-{sequence}/checklist.md.

Step 3: Determine Implementation Order

Determine implementation order based on feature point dependencies:

  • Data models → Database scripts
  • Backend interfaces → Controller/Service/Mapper
  • Frontend pages → Vue components

Step 4: Generate Database Scripts

Generate SQL scripts based on data models:

CREATE TABLE `{table_name}` (
  `id` bigint(20) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT 'Primary Key',
  -- Business fields
  `create_time` datetime DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'Creation Time',
  `update_time` datetime DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'Update Time',
  `create_by` varchar(64) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'Creator',
  `update_by` varchar(64) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT 'Updater',
  `status` char(1) DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'Status',
  `del_flag` char(1) DEFAULT '0' COMMENT 'Delete Flag',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COMMENT='{Table Comment}';

Step 5: Generate Backend Code

Call software-engineer to generate code that complies with standards:

a. Domain Entity Class

@Data
@TableName("{table_name}")
public class {EntityName} {
    @TableId(type = IdType.AUTO)
    private Long id;
    // Business fields
    @TableField(fill = FieldFill.INSERT)
    private Date createTime;
    @TableField(fill = FieldFill.INSERT_UPDATE)
    private Date updateTime;
    // ...
}

b. Mapper Interface

@Mapper
public interface {EntityName}Mapper extends BaseMapper<{EntityName}> {
    // Custom query methods
}

c. Service Interface and Implementation

public interface I{EntityName}Service extends IService<{EntityName}> {
    // Business methods
}

@Service
public class {EntityName}ServiceImpl extends ServiceImpl<{EntityName}Mapper, {EntityName}> implements I{EntityName}Service {
    // Business implementation
}

d. Controller

@RestController
@RequestMapping("/{module}")
public class {EntityName}Controller {
    @Autowired
    private I{EntityName}Service service;

    // Interface methods
}

Step 6: Generate Frontend Code

Call software-engineer to generate frontend code:

a. API Interface

import request from '@/utils/request'

export function list{EntityName}(query) {
  return request({
    url: '/{module}/list',
    method: 'get',
    params: query
  })
}

b. Vue Component

<template>
  <!-- Page template -->
</template>

<script>
export default {
  name: '{EntityName}',
  data() {
    return {
      // Data
    }
  },
  methods: {
    // Methods
  }
}
</script>

Step 7: Implement Business Logic

Implement based on business logic in specifications:

  • Processing flow
  • Validation rules
  • State transitions
  • Exception handling

Expert Consultation (as needed):

  • RuoYi issues → expert-ruoyi
  • Database issues → expert-mysql

Step 8: Run Test Validation

If test cases exist, run test validation:

  • Unit tests
  • Interface tests
  • Integration tests

Step 9: Update Acceptance Status

Update acceptance status in checklist.md:

  • Business acceptance items
  • Technical acceptance items
  • Integration acceptance items

Step 10: Generate Acceptance Report

Output acceptance results:

## Acceptance Report

**Feature Point**: FP-XXX-NNN
**Feature Name**: xxx
**Acceptance Date**: {Date}

### Business Acceptance
| No. | Acceptance Scenario | Expected Result | Actual Result | Status |
|------|---------|---------|---------|------|
| 1 | xxx | xxx | xxx | ✓/✗ |

### Technical Acceptance
| No. | Acceptance Item | Standard | Actual | Status |

### Issue Log
- [Issue1]: Description
- [Issue2]: Description

### Conclusion
- [ ] Pass
- [ ] Fail, needs modification

3. Expert Consultation Process

pdd-implement-feature starts
    │
    ├─► Identify RuoYi framework issues
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   expert-ruoyi consultation
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   Return solution
    │
    ├─► Identify database issues
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   expert-mysql consultation
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   Return optimization solution
    │
    ├─► Identify code quality issues
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   expert-code-quality consultation
    │       │
    │       ▼
    │   Return refactoring recommendations
    │
    └─► Continue implementation

3.1 expert-ruoyi Invocation Example

Trigger Condition: Encountering permission validation issues
Call: expert-ruoyi
Input:
  - Issue: @PreAuthorize annotation not working
  - Code snippet: [Related code]
  - Error message: Permission validation failed

Return:
  - Solution
  - Best practices
  - sys_menu configuration recommendations

3.2 expert-mysql Invocation Example

Trigger Condition: Encountering query performance issues
Call: expert-mysql
Input:
  - SQL: SELECT * FROM large_table WHERE ...
  - Table size: 10 million records
  - Execution plan: [EXPLAIN result]

Return:
  - Optimization solution
  - Index recommendations
  - SQL rewrite

4. Code Standards

4.1 Backend Standards

  • Class names use PascalCase
  • Method names use camelCase
  • Constants use UPPER_SNAKE_CASE
  • Comments use Javadoc format

4.2 Frontend Standards

  • Component names use PascalCase
  • Method names use camelCase
  • CSS class names use kebab-case
  • Use ES6+ syntax

4.3 software-engineer Standards

Follow the core rules of software-engineer skill:

  • Read existing code style before writing new code
  • Error handling first
  • Keep it minimal
  • PR-ready code

5. Guardrails

  • Code must comply with project standards
  • Must implement all interfaces defined in specifications
  • Must handle all exceptions defined in specifications
  • Must pass all acceptance items before marking as complete
  • Must synchronize specification documents after code changes
  • Must consult expert skills when encountering technical issues
  • Code implementation must follow software-engineer standards

6. Collaboration with Other Skills

Collaborative SkillCollaboration MethodInput DataExpected Output
software-engineerDelegationSpecification documentsStandards-compliant code
expert-ruoyiConsultationTechnical issuesSolutions
expert-mysqlConsultationSQL issuesOptimization solutions
expert-code-qualityConsultationCode issuesRefactoring recommendations
pdd-code-reviewerSequentialCode + SpecificationsReview report
pdd-pr-createSequentialChange IDPR + Review report
pdd-pr-mergeSequentialChange IDMerge + Archive

7. PR Management Layer Prompts

7.1 Prompt After Feature Point Completion

After feature point implementation and validation passes, prompt user that PR management skills can be used:

## Feature Point Implementation Complete

**Feature Point**: FP-XXX-NNN
**Status**: Acceptance passed

### Available PR Management Operations

If you need to create a PR, you can manually call the following skills:
- `/pdd-pr-create {change-id}` - Create PR and execute automated review
- `/pdd-pr-review {change-id}` - View PR review results
- `/pdd-pr-merge {change-id}` - Merge PR and archive

### Manual Operation Steps

1. Create OpenSpec Change (optional):

/openspec-new-change {change-name}


2. Create PR:

/pdd-pr-create {change-id}


3. Confirm merge:

/pdd-pr-merge {change-id}

7.2 Do Not Automatically Call PR Skills

Important Principles:

  • PDD framework will not automatically call pdd-pr-* skills
  • Users need to manually decide whether to use PR management features
  • PR management skills are optional, not required

7.3 PR Management Skill Description

SkillFunctionInvocation Method
pdd-pr-createCreate PR and execute automated reviewUser manual call
pdd-pr-reviewView PR review resultsUser manual call
pdd-pr-mergeMerge PR and archiveUser manual call
pdd-pr-batchBatch process multiple PRsUser manual call

8. Guardrails (Updated)

  • Code must comply with project standards
  • Must implement all interfaces defined in specifications
  • Must handle all exceptions defined in specifications
  • Must pass all acceptance items before marking as complete
  • Must synchronize specification documents after code changes
  • Must consult expert skills when encountering technical issues
  • Code implementation must follow software-engineer standards
  • Prompt user about available PR management skills after feature point completion, but do not automatically call

9. Error Handling and Fallback Specifications

9.1 Error Classification

LevelDefinitionBlocking
CriticalMust fix, blocks process✅ Blocking
WarningRecommended to fix, non-blocking❌ Non-blocking
SuggestionOptional optimization❌ Non-blocking

9.2 Retry Strategy

Limit: Maximum 3 times per feature point
Count: Each re-review/validation after fix counts as 1 time
Exceed limit: Pause process, wait for manual decision

9.3 Fallback Rules

Failure ScenarioFallback PositionRe-execution
pdd-code-reviewer review failedpdd-implement-featureRe-review after fix
pdd-verify-feature validation failedpdd-implement-featureRe-validate after fix

9.4 Failure Recording

  • Location: dev-specs/FP-{module}-{sequence}/review-report.md
  • Record Content:
    • Failure time
    • Failure stage
    • Failure reason
    • Number of attempts
    • Related error logs

9.5 Manual Intervention Process

Retry count exceeds 3 times
    │
    ▼
Pause process
    │
    ▼
Generate pause report
    ├── Current status
    ├── Failure history
    ├── Attempted fixes
    └── Issues requiring manual decision
    │
    ▼
Wait for manual decision
    ├── Continue fixing
    ├── Skip current feature point
    ├── Terminate process
    └── Other solutions

10. PDD Implementation Specification Reference

This Skill follows the PDD framework implementation specifications. For details, see pdd-framework-design.md Chapter 9.

Core Specification Summary

SpecificationCore Content
Skill Boundariespdd-code-reviewer (compliance) → expert-code-quality (quality depth)
Context PassingFile system passing, directory structure standards, supports checkpoint resumption
Manual ReviewBatch review + detailed review of critical feature points
Error HandlingCritical blocking, pause after 3 retries waiting for manual intervention
PR ManagementManual trigger, Change-granularity PR, manual archiving
Documentation System9 core document types, naming conventions, in-document change history

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.