agentleFS
wonderslifewonderslife/pdd-skills/pdd-entropy-reduction/SKILL.md

pdd-entropy-reduction

Skill41 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub

PDD Entropy Reduction Agent, continuously monitors and repays technical debt to prevent system decay. Automatically triggered when users need code cleanup, documentation updates, technical debt management, architecture alignment, entropy reduction, or garbage collection.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

10 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈8

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Action: When documentation is found to be out of sync with implementation, automatically initiate a Pull Request for fixes.

    line 79
  2. Distinctive:

    Documentation Detection: Only scan documentation-related issues

    line 156
  3. Distinctive:

    Architecture Detection: Only scan architecture constraint violations

    line 157
  4. Distinctive:

    Code Detection: Only scan code quality issues

    line 158
  5. Very specific:

    Use references/entropy-report-template.md to generate entropy report, including:

    line 162
  6. Distinctive:

    All API entry points must have Schema validation

    line 215
  7. Distinctive:

    Don't rely on implicit type inference

    line 216
  8. Distinctive:

    Every commit is an improvement opportunity

    line 227
  9. Distinctive:

    Don't let technical debt accumulate

    line 228
  10. Very specific:

    After each entropy reduction execution, generate an entropy report saved to the docs/entropy-reports/ directory:

    line 283

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

PDD Entropy Reduction Agent

Core Philosophy

"Technical debt is like a high-interest loan: it's better to continuously repay the debt in small amounts than to let it accumulate and then painfully resolve it all at once." —— OpenAI Harness Engineering

In the PDD (PRD-Driven Development) methodology, the core objective of the entropy reduction mechanism is to combat system "entropy increase" and "decay" by periodically running agents to discover documentation inconsistencies or architecture constraint violations.

Natural Trend of Entropy Increase

Entropy Increase (Natural Trend):
- Code decay: Duplicate code, overly long functions, inconsistent naming
- Documentation obsolescence: Code and documentation out of sync, outdated comments
- Technical debt accumulation: Unhandled TODOs, unoptimized temporary solutions
- Architecture drift: Violating dependency directions, blurred boundaries
- Test deficiency: Decreasing coverage, outdated tests

Entropy Reduction (Requires Energy Input):
- Refactoring: Eliminate duplication, simplify complexity
- Documentation updates: Synchronize documentation with code
- Technical debt repayment: Handle TODOs, optimize temporary solutions
- Architecture alignment: Fix violations, strengthen boundaries
- Test supplementation: Increase coverage, update tests

Four Professional Sub-Skills

The entropy reduction agent coordinates four professional sub-skills to form a complete entropy reduction closed loop:

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                  pdd-entropy-reduction                       │
│                      (Main Coordinator)                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                             │
│  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐  ┌─────────────┐│
│  │ pdd-doc-    │  │ expert-arch │  │ expert-     │  │ expert-auto ││
│  │ gardener    │  │ -enforcer   │  │ entropy-    │  │ -refactor   ││
│  │             │  │             │  │ auditor     │  │             ││
│  │ Document    │  │ Architecture│  │ Entropy     │  │ Auto        ││
│  │ Gardener    │  │ Enforcer    │  │ Auditor     │  │ Refactor    ││
│  └─────────────┘  └─────────────┘  └─────────────┘  └─────────────┘│
│                                                             │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

1. pdd-doc-gardener (Document Gardener)

Responsibility: Periodically scans the docs/ directory in the code repository to identify outdated or deprecated documentation that no longer reflects actual code behavior.

Detection Items:

  • Code and documentation inconsistency
  • Outdated comments (TODOs existing for more than N days)
  • Code referenced in documentation has been deleted
  • API documentation doesn't match implementation

Action: When documentation is found to be out of sync with implementation, automatically initiate a Pull Request for fixes.

2. expert-arch-enforcer (Architecture Constraint Enforcer)

Responsibility: Monitors whether code violates preset invariants and architecture boundaries.

Detection Items:

  • Module dependency direction violations (e.g., Types → Config → Repo → Service → Runtime → UI)
  • Missing boundary data validation
  • File size exceeding limits
  • Naming convention violations

Tool Integration: Utilizes custom Linters or structural tests (like ArchUnit), running periodically in the background to scan for deviations.

3. expert-entropy-auditor (Entropy Increase Auditor)

Responsibility: Discovers gaps between "design intent" and "code implementation".

Detection Items:

  • PRD and code implementation inconsistency
  • Spec documentation and code inconsistency
  • Duplicate code (AI residue)
  • Guessed data structures
  • Scattered utility tools

Function: Like a garbage collector, identifies "AI residue" scattered in the codebase and recommends consolidating them into shared utility packages.

4. expert-auto-refactor (Automated Refactoring)

Responsibility: Transforms collected quality improvement tasks into concrete code operations.

Strategy: Periodically initiates targeted refactoring PRs using a "small loan repayment" approach to prevent technical debt accumulation.

Refactoring Types:

  • Extract common methods
  • Eliminate duplicate code
  • Simplify complex logic
  • Optimize naming

Workflow

Entropy Reduction Execution Process

┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐     ┌─────────────┐
│   Trigger   │ ──→ │   Scan      │ ──→ │   Analyze   │ ──→ │   Execute   │
│             │     │             │     │             │     │             │
│ • Manual    │     │ • Doc scan  │     │ • Entropy   │     │ • Auto fix  │
│ • Scheduled │     │ • Code scan │     │   score     │     │ • Create PR │
│ • Event     │     │ • Arch scan │     │ • Classify  │     │ • Update    │
│             │     │             │     │ • Prioritize│     │   docs      │
└─────────────┘     └─────────────┘     └─────────────┘     └─────────────┘

Entropy Score System

Entropy score range: 0-100 (100 = most orderly)

Score RangeStatusRecommended Action
90-100ExcellentMaintain current state
70-89GoodSmall improvements
50-69FairPlanned cleanup
30-49WarningPriority handling
0-29CriticalEmergency refactoring

Execution Guide

Step 1: Entropy Detection

Based on user request or trigger condition, select appropriate detection scope:

  1. Full Detection: Scan all entropy increase points
  2. Documentation Detection: Only scan documentation-related issues
  3. Architecture Detection: Only scan architecture constraint violations
  4. Code Detection: Only scan code quality issues

Step 2: Generate Entropy Report

Use references/entropy-report-template.md to generate entropy report, including:

  • Entropy score
  • Issue list (sorted by priority)
  • Fix recommendations
  • Estimated workload

Step 3: Entropy Reduction Execution

Select execution strategy based on issue type:

Issue TypeExecution MethodManual Confirmation
Simple fixes (naming, formatting)Auto fix and commitNo
Medium fixes (documentation updates)Create PRYes
Complex fixes (refactoring)Create Issue + PRYes

Integration with PDD Framework

PDD Forward Process                      PDD Entropy Reduction Process
    │                                     │
    ▼                                     ▼
┌─────────────┐                    ┌─────────────┐
│ PRD Document │                    │ Entropy     │
├─────────────┤                    │ Detection   │
│ Feature     │                    ├─────────────┤
│ Extraction  │                    │ Entropy     │
├─────────────┤                    │ Report      │
│ Spec Design │                    ├─────────────┤
├─────────────┤                    │ Entropy     │
│ Code        │  ←───────────────  │ Reduction   │
│ Implementation│                   │ Execution   │
├─────────────┤                    ├─────────────┤
│ Acceptance  │                    │ Auto Fix    │
│ Testing     │                    ├─────────────┤
└─────────────┘                    │ PR Creation │
                                   └─────────────┘

Golden Principles

Based on Harness Engineering best practices, define the following golden principles:

  1. Use Shared Toolkits, Avoid Handwritten Helper Functions
    • Centralize invariant management
    • Reduce duplicate code
  2. Validate Boundary Data, Don't Guess Data Structures
    • All API entry points must have Schema validation
    • Don't rely on implicit type inference
  3. Keep Code Concise, Prioritize Readability
    • Single file no more than 300 lines
    • Single function no more than 50 lines
  4. Documentation as Code, Keep Synchronized
    • Code changes must synchronize documentation
    • Outdated documentation is considered technical debt
  5. Small Loan Repayment, Continuous Improvement
    • Every commit is an improvement opportunity
    • Don't let technical debt accumulate

Configuration File

Entropy reduction behavior can be configured via entropy-config.yaml:

# entropy-config.yaml
entropy_reduction:
  # Trigger configuration
  triggers:
    schedule: "0 2 * * *"  # Daily at 2 AM
    on_commit: false       # Trigger on commit
    on_pr_merge: true      # Trigger on PR merge
  
  # Detection configuration
  detection:
    docs:
      enabled: true
      paths: ["docs/", "*.md"]
      max_age_days: 30     # Maximum documentation age in days
    architecture:
      enabled: true
      layers: ["types", "config", "repo", "service", "runtime", "ui"]
    code:
      enabled: true
      max_file_lines: 300
      max_function_lines: 50
    tests:
      enabled: true
      min_coverage: 80
  
  # Execution configuration
  execution:
    auto_fix: true         # Auto fix simple issues
    create_pr: true        # Create PR
    max_pr_per_run: 5      # Maximum PRs per run
  
  # Scoring configuration
  scoring:
    weights:
      docs: 0.25
      architecture: 0.25
      code: 0.25
      tests: 0.25

Output Format

Entropy Report Format

After each entropy reduction execution, generate an entropy report saved to the docs/entropy-reports/ directory:

# Entropy Reduction Report - YYYY-MM-DD

## Entropy Score: XX/100

## Issue List

### Critical (Must Fix)
- [ ] Issue description

### Warning (Recommended Fix)
- [ ] Issue description

### Info (Optional Fix)
- [ ] Issue description

## Fix Recommendations

### Critical Fixes
1. Fix recommendation details

## Execution Results
- Auto fixed: X items
- Created PR: X items
- Skipped: X items

Usage Examples

Example 1: Full Entropy Reduction

User: Execute full entropy reduction

AI:
1. Trigger all detectors
2. Generate entropy report
3. Execute fixes by priority
4. Report results

Example 2: Documentation Entropy Reduction

User: Check documentation consistency

AI:
1. Trigger pdd-doc-gardener
2. Scan docs/ directory
3. Compare code with documentation
4. Generate fix PR

Example 3: Architecture Entropy Reduction

User: Check architecture constraints

AI:
1. Trigger expert-arch-enforcer
2. Run custom Linter
3. Detect dependency violations
4. Generate fix recommendations

References

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.